Can We Clear Up The No Trade Clause Myth?

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,455
Reaction score
65,398
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,455
Reaction score
65,398
Also, none of this matters because he’s just going to get extended.

We’ll be going through this again when we have a 36 year old Dak that’s owed 80+ million in his final year because cap boyz like to kick money down the road. So I expect extensions for Dak until he retires.

Oh, and he’ll still have that no trade clause.
 

Proof

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,128
Reaction score
13,876
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
yeah, I get tired of hearing about it as an impossibility. we've seen it happen before, and even recently w/ Carr. Makes things more difficult obviously, but not impossible.
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,021
Reaction score
16,141
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
Thanks, agreed it's not impossible!
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,021
Reaction score
16,141
yeah, I get tired of hearing about it as an impossibility. we've seen it happen before, and even recently w/ Carr. Makes things more difficult obviously, but not impossible.
Facts!!
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,145
Reaction score
47,548
Also, none of this matters because he’s just going to get extended.

We’ll be going through this again when we have a 36 year old Dak that’s owed 80+ million in his final year because cap boyz like to kick money down the road. So I expect extensions for Dak until he retires.

Oh, and he’ll still have that no trade clause.
So why did you create this thread if you knew all of this???

:facepalm:
 

acr731

Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
Messages
8,833
Reaction score
24,539
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
Nah, Jerry did that to avoid hurting AC's feelers.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,342
Reaction score
92,367
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
Not to defend Jerry but its not uncommon for QBs to get no trade clauses. Wilson had one but waived it for Denver.
 

DeaconMoss

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,189
Reaction score
6,873
A no-trade clause is a stipulation in a contract that allows a player to reject any proposed trade in which they are involved. No-trade clauses may also feature variations, such as provisions stating a list of pre-determined teams a player is willing to waive the no-trade clause for or one that allows a team to only trade a player during a certain period of time

Carr, Dak, Allen, Wilson, Watson are the guys with a NT clause.

Carr was traded. Wilson about to be. Hopefully Dak is also.

Dak's list would prob be SF, Ravens or the All-Madden team on xbox.
 

PAPPYDOG

There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!
Messages
19,270
Reaction score
33,139
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
Dak will accept any trade as Jerry can threaten to make him a post-June 1st cut.
 

PAPPYDOG

There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!
Messages
19,270
Reaction score
33,139
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Lol if he would accept a trade he would PREFER to be cut and be a free agent.

Clueless
You are Clueless as after June the 1st most teams have their starting QB1 in place already.
You know the draft has ended and not many teams interested in paying 60 million to a choking QB.
 

Mac_MaloneV1

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,975
Reaction score
4,361
You are Clueless as after June the 1st most teams have their starting QB1 in place already.
You know the draft has ended and not many teams interested in paying 60 million to a choking QB.
Nope. The June 1 cut would take place in March anyway. They'd have to give him an extension anyway if they traded for him, makes no difference.

You have no idea what you're talking about.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,082
Reaction score
64,570
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Having a no trade clause does not mean you cannot be traded.

It simply gives the player leverage to choose his destination.

So, if Jerry decides he wants to trade Dak he could do it, but only if Dak is okay with the destination.

This is just another example of how Dak’s agent schooled Jerry in negotiations.
Dak will only be replaced when they find a better option.

You should be the world's biggest Trey Lance fan. Jerry personally traded for Lance. Jerry has incentive for Lance to replace Dak.

Players that get benched never refuse a trade...
 
Top