tyke1doe;2896489 said:I think when it's a simultaneous event, where the knee and the ball touch. It goes where the ball is. But it was pretty clear that Crayton's knee touched before the ball did.
I could be wrong, though. But I always thought it was where the knee touches.
adamknite;2896488 said:No.. it's where the ball is when his knee touches. Why do you think players always extend when they're about to be tackled?
RedRaiderCowboysFan;2896490 said:Well ya I would say he is better now because he is what 6 years younger then Gonzalez, but Gonzalez plays the same as he did when he was Witten's age. Hopefully when Witten is 33 he is still playing to the level he is today. But like most "experts" say on tv, Gonzalez is the best ever.
adamknite;2896503 said:No. It's the ball, that's why the player's knee doesn't have to be in the endzone to score a TD.
tyke1doe;2896510 said:I disagree. If a player's knee touches and then the player extends the ball into the endzone, that won't be a touchdown.
tyke1doe;2896505 said:Unless the knee clearly touches before the ball is extended. I can see in situations where the knee and the ball touch simultaneously. But it was pretty clear, at least to me, that Crayton's knee touched way before he extended the ball.
At any rate, it's no big deal. We converted anyway.