Rush did what was asked.Lamb was 31 for 380 yards in the 5 games Rush threw to him.
Lamb was 31 for 448 with Dak in his last 5 games.
Yep, that's a huge difference.
I was under the impression he was being facetious.
Well the Packers did get two touchdowns after two interceptions. That was a team loss. The end zone interception was a 10 point swing.The offense scored 28 that game….defense got 31 put on it.
So the offense is perfect now and we can expect at least 3 super bowls in a row? That's great !!!
I’m not in the business of taking away points to prove a point. They scored 28 and were up by 14. Those are facts. The offense didn’t allow Watson to have the game of his career.Factoring in the brain dead interceptions the offense scored like 14 actual points.
And they stalled out in overtime with the ball against a terrible defense.
Turnovers are costly. You can’t say “wow we got 28 defense totally let us down “When you throw two interceptions with a lead.The defense didn't score any, so what do you mean by that?
That’s one bad matchup. Tall wide receivers against Anthony brown. That alone shouldn’t lose you a gameI’m not in the business of taking away points to prove a point. They scored 28 and were up by 14. Those are facts. The offense didn’t allow Watson to have the game of his career.
I agree. And it didn’t solely cause the loss. I thought Bland was also having issues.That’s one bad matchup. Tall wide receivers against Anthony brown. That alone shouldn’t lose you a game
So if you throw a interception that gives the defense a pass to allow scores?Well the Packers did get two touchdowns after two interceptions. That was a team loss. The end zone interception was a 10 point swing.
Stick to hating. Your sarcasm is weak.So the offense is perfect now and we can expect at least 3 super bowls in a row? That's great !!!
So when the Cowboys were up 14 how many interceptions did Dak throw? They aren’t blameless but people are changing the narrative. The Cowboys were up two scores.To be fair, that's partly because the offense turned it over twice, once being in the end zone...which isn't to say I think the offense lost the game, just that they're not blameless.
If you are up 10-0. The Packers play the game differently. Also it was a sudden change situation where the defense had to run back out on the field.So if you throw a interception that gives the defense a pass to allow scores?
14.5 ypc and 12.3 ypc. In this case it's the difference between a top 20 receiver and a top 5 receiver. The difference between a borderline No. 1 receiver and a bona fide No. 1 receiver.Lamb was 31 for 380 yards in the 5 games Rush threw to him.
Lamb was 31 for 448 with Dak in his last 5 games.
Yep, that's a huge difference.
See Dak Haters mindset....So the offense is perfect now and we can expect at least 3 super bowls in a row? That's great !!!
Turnovers are costly. However. Dak also made amends and put up 14 points. Thats what GB got off those 2 INTs. So lets call those a wash. Cowboys were up by 14. In the 4th. And lost. You guys will say anything to not have to admit Dak has been playing well lol its incredible.Turnovers are costly. You can’t say “wow we got 28 defense totally let us down “When you throw two interceptions with a lead.
with a lead against that old quarterback this defense was gonna feast. Playing the way dak did totally let the defense down. Stat chasing or Idk what.
couldn’t even generate some first downs in overtime without costly mistakes.
I’m not in the business of taking away points to prove a point. They scored 28 and were up by 14. Those are facts. The offense didn’t allow Watson to have the game of his career.
Here y’all go lol. Y’all can’t even acknowledge y’all were wrong lol.