Twitter: CeeDee Lamb since Dak returned

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
Yeah Pro Bowls and All Pro are completely different. Because if you get rid of an All Pro you will feel the effects of it. You get rid of a pro bowler who gets in based on reputation? All of a sudden your team gets better.

I think he’s proving it wasn’t “reputation only” as he’s putting the numbers up with one of the absolute worst QBs in the league on a bad team. There aren’t hardly any people in the world who don’t think Amari is among the top 15 or so WRs in the league except for this board. Saying we are better now without him is pure fantasy. Amari plus Ceedee plus Gallup was a great trio and we wouldn’t need Odell now. In fact, I’d suspect we’d have one less loss had we kept amari.
 

Oz-of-Cowboy-Country

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,259
Reaction score
17,077
These numbers are so deceiving...

Lamb with Dak : 29+106+45+150+77+70 = 477 ÷ 6 = 79.5 per game

Lamb with Rush: 75+87+97+53+68 = 380 ÷ 5 = 76.0 yards per game.

I see 3.5 more yards with Dak but continue with your narrative.
Dak to Lamb has really come alive the last two games. Let's hope that trend continues and their numbers start to separate themselves from the pack.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,565
Reaction score
77,815
I think he’s proving it wasn’t “reputation only” as he’s putting the numbers up with one of the absolute worst QBs in the league on a bad team. There aren’t hardly any people in the world who don’t think Amari is among the top 15 or so WRs in the league except for this board. Saying we are better now without him is pure fantasy. Amari plus Ceedee plus Gallup was a great trio and we wouldn’t need Odell now. In fact, I’d suspect we’d have one less loss had we kept amari.
Why do you guys think having a bad quarterback means you won’t produce? You see what Brandon Cooks has done with bad quarterbacks? Bad quarterbacks produce they just don’t win.

We don’t need Odell. Our playoff chances don’t increase or get worse because of him. The trio never showed up at the same time. What’s the point of having them?
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
Cowboys offense has risen to another level since Dak return.

 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,433
Reaction score
21,463
The OL has jelled.
Pollard is a threat, defenses have to scheme to him.
They have changed the route tree and we got our#1 receiver back.
That's the difference.

Run game generally has jelled.
Run blocking gets better and better.
Last game Zeke was showing some burst too.
Dak adds a run threat.
Using Turpin, Lamb, and even Hendershot.
Multi threat run game. What I've wanted for years.

We're getting very balanced - meaning we're getting consistent run production every game.
Dak had 46 attempts in the GB loss.
30 or less in all the wins.

Play defense. Run the damn ball. Make their defense defend the run.
*Then* take your shots in the passing game.
Speaking of which, we *finally* sent Pollard deep.
 

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
Why do you guys think having a bad quarterback means you won’t produce? You see what Brandon Cooks has done with bad quarterbacks? Bad quarterbacks produce they just don’t win.

We don’t need Odell. Our playoff chances don’t increase or get worse because of him. The trio never showed up at the same time. What’s the point of having them?

injury…..more threats for the defenses to have to account for…general offensive options..
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,565
Reaction score
77,815
injury…..more threats for the defenses to have to account for…general offensive options..
Yet guys all over the league produce with bad qb play. That’s what Amari is. Or what he showed anyway….he will produce until you rely on him in big games then his head coach is benching him for strange reasons.
 
Top