Chase Claypool

dallas72 said:
U listed like 5 guys...stop the drama
Click to expand...
Only one of them is actually in the league.

Just admit that there aren't several TEs in the 4.4s. Don't say I'm being dramatic b/c you made something up.
 
Future said:
Only one of them is actually in the league.

Just admit that there aren't several TEs in the 4.4s. Don't say I'm being dramatic b/c you made something up.
Click to expand...
Several = more than 1. ..your like a 15 year old girl DRAMA...
 
dallas72 said:
Albert O, Fant, Evan's that's 3 right there ./mic drop piss off now
Click to expand...
Fant didn't run in the 4.4s and Albert isn't in the league yet. That is 1.

Maybe we just have a different definition of several, but it certainly doesn't mean 2. AND, more to the point, you're acting as if they're commonplace. They're not. Your point was wrong, no matter how many times you tell yourself to piss off.
 
Future said:
Fant didn't run in the 4.4s and Albert isn't in the league yet. That is 1.

Maybe we just have a different definition of several, but it certainly doesn't mean 2. AND, more to the point, you're acting as if they're commonplace. They're not. Your point was wrong, no matter how many times you tell yourself to piss off.
Click to expand...
Definition of several = more than 1...I stated 3...I'm blocking u now .your 100% wrong...u just like to argue..im sorry your life isnt that fun...you just look to argue even when your wrong ...
 
dallas72 said:
Definition of several = more than 1...I stated 3...I'm blocking u now .your 100% wrong...u just like to argue..im sorry your life isnt that fun...you just look to argue even when your wrong ...
Click to expand...
OK BOOMER

You stated 3. One didn't run in the 4.4s and the other is not currently in the NFL. So you named 1.
 
Even though he ran super fast for his hiefht Id still make him a TE
 
KingintheNorth said:
Hate that I love a Notre Dame prospect so much.

Two actually, Claypool and Kmet.
Click to expand...

Really depends on where you get these guys too.

I think Troy Pride has some upside at CB. If he was there in the 3rd, I'd be fine with taking him. No way before that.

Khalid Kareem is another NDer to keep an eye on. Good size, decent edge player and might be worth a flier in the 4th or 5th, especially if we are in the market for more DE depth.
 
CATCH17 said:
What do you do with this guy?

He is closer to a TE then he is a WR as far as body shape and size.

I don’t think he see him as an X or a Z WR at the next level.

Is he just a better Blake Jarwin in the receiving game?

He’s a difficult player to figure out.




Click to expand...

DK Metcalf says Hi.
 
Sydla said:
Really depends on where you get these guys too.

I think Troy Pride has some upside at CB. If he was there in the 3rd, I'd be fine with taking him. No way before that.

Khalid Kareem is another NDer to keep an eye on. Good size, decent edge player and might be worth a flier in the 4th or 5th, especially if we are in the market for more DE depth.
Click to expand...

I don’t think you’d bat an eye if we drafted and signed every Notre Dame player available, lol.
 
One interesting tidbit about Claypool I find intriguing is that he played on coverage units for the Irish, registering 25 career tackles (that’s pretty good).

Given what looks to be a revamping of our special teams, Claypool could provide added utility while also serving in the offense.

Michael Pittman also played on coverage units at USC.
 
CalPolyTechnique said:
One interesting tidbit about Claypool I find intriguing is that he played on coverage units for the Irish, registering 25 career tackles (that’s pretty good).

Given what looks to be a revamping of our special teams, Claypool could provide added utility while also serving in the offense.

Michael Pittman also played on coverage units at USC.
Click to expand...

The guy is just a great athlete and really good football player... The key is just figuring out what to do with him and how big of a role can he really have on the team.

If he can’t get on the field much then we can’t draft him.

I got a feeling the Cowboys will look at him and say to themselves that they already have a player like this in Blake Jarwin..

Maaaaybe they could see him as a guy who is elite at high point catches in the reDzone.
 
He’s the type of guy NO drafts and he becomes a major weapon.......
 
CalPolyTechnique said:
One interesting tidbit about Claypool I find intriguing is that he played on coverage units for the Irish, registering 25 career tackles (that’s pretty good).

Given what looks to be a revamping of our special teams, Claypool could provide added utility while also serving in the offense.

Michael Pittman also played on coverage units at USC.
Click to expand...

He's an absolute beast as a special teamer.
 
DRAFT Claypool in the 4th round. Transition him to TE. He is a miss match and can block very well
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

  • Sarge
    Sarge
    Red, White and Brew...

Members online

Total: 8,160 (members: 50, guests: 8,110)
Robots: 1,379

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,768
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top