Sorry. That was PI. Twice. First the jersey grab and then the contact with the shoulder.
We got away with one. I refuse to pretend otherwise.
Contact was by both players. The official saw that and made the call to let them play. Key word to me in what you said is "pretend" because you refuse to acknowledge that contact was made by both players despite the evidence, so therefore you pretend that that the contact was one sided.
As for first contact. I am sorry I didn't realize that once a penalty was called you had to stop looking for them for the rest of the play. Guess I will have to look up what "there were multiple fouls on the play" means when an official says it. Can any one help me with that since according to Risen no foul is a foul after the first flag is thrown?
The facemask is irrelevant to whether it was PI or not. You guys are using that to distract from the actual call on the field.
No it is not. It shows that contact was made by both players. The official may not have seen the facemask but saw the contact by Pettigrew. Contact was by both players and the line official said he didn't see enough from either to justify the flag and it was picked up. You are keying on the facemask only. It was the fact that contact was made by both and it was insignificant according to the line judge, hence the pick up, correctly, of the flag. This is exactly what Carter was talking about.
