Chris Henry, In Trouble Again

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
cowboys#1;1504983 said:
why dont the bengals just release this guy and get rid of him and the bad press?

Can they? Is it allowable under the current CBA to release a player who is suspended?
 

xpistofer

Active Member
Messages
999
Reaction score
199
Hostile;1504934 said:
Talent going to waste is simply incomprehensible to me. How can you be at the pinnacle of dreams and piss it away so easily?

it's simple, really...guaranteed money via signing bonuses...
the guy already has more money than he could ever dream of...
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
joseephuss;1505042 said:
Can they? Is it allowable under the current CBA to release a player who is suspended?

Not until they come off of suspension....I believe.

We weren't able to cut Marcus Coleman last yr until he was back from suspension.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
ThreeSportStar80;1505041 said:
Like a previous poster pointed out, it could very well be a form a pain killers that caused him to fail the drug test

Why would it matter if it was a pain killer or not? Opiates ARE pain killers. Heroin, morphine, codeine, all the synthetics.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
Yeagermeister;1505045 said:
Not until they come off of suspension....I believe.

We weren't able to cut Marcus Coleman last yr until he was back from suspension.

I think that is untrue -- we could have cut Coleman -- but had we done that, it would have meant that if a team wanted to sign him, he would have had to serve the 4 week suspension AFTER they signed him.

That was a simple courtesy to Coleman -- it didn't cost the team anything. Otherwise, that suspension would have effectively ended his career.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
abersonc;1505051 said:
Why would it matter if it was a pain killer or not? Opiates ARE pain killers. Heroin, morphine, codeine, all the synthetics.

The only thing that would matter is if it was a prescribed pain killer. I am sure they would have been aware of anything he was prescribed before he even took the test and would consider that before saying he failed the test.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
from ESPN Keith Kidd's chat

Dustin (Dayton, OH)
Channel 12 in Cincy is now reporting Henry may have not failed. Seems the reports about Henry could be false! With or without Henry do you see the Bengals back in the playoffs?

KEITH KIDD
I do think Cincinnati has a great shot at winning the division or the Wild Card based on their offense. But this team has not played consistently well on defense since Marvin Lewis became the coach.
 

03EBZ06

Need2Speed
Messages
7,984
Reaction score
411
ThreeSportStar80;1505041 said:
Like a previous poster pointed out, it could very well be a form a pain killers that caused him to fail the drug test ...
The thing is, it was a court mandated drug test. That means Henry will be asked to divulge all the medications he is currently taking so that when a certain drug is detected, it will be cross checked with medication list provided by Henry and if it was on the list, it isn't considered as a failed drug test.

Because of my clearance in the Navy, dealing with Nukes, and current job, I have donated a speciman countless times (sometimes once a month, depending on what program I was involved with) and the process is that you always submit medication list prior to the drug test.
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
adamknite;1504926 said:
You know I hate laughing at others misfortune, but at a certain point it starts getting comical how bone headed some people can be.

That's how I've always felt about Michael Irvin. :bang2:
 

BouncingCheese

Stay out of my Bidness
Messages
1,704
Reaction score
0
Yeagermeister;1505045 said:
Not until they come off of suspension....I believe.

We weren't able to cut Marcus Coleman last yr until he was back from suspension.

Goodell is going to start making it VERY easy for teams to let go of players like Henry if they act up regardless of contract situations and possible cap hits me thinks....
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
POSTED 1:34 p.m. EDT, May 21, 2007

HENRY PROSECUTOR WAS WR-WR-WR-INCORRECT?

WKRC-TV reports that there's now a chance that Bengals receiver Chris Henry has not tested positive for opiates.

Garry Edmondson, a prosecutor in Kenton County, Kentucky, said earlier on Monday that Henry had tested positive. But now Edmondson is signing a different song.

He now says that one result was negative (which is positive) and the other result is pending.

Edmondson wouldn't say who told him that there was a positive result.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
WoodysGirl;1505109 said:
POSTED 1:34 p.m. EDT, May 21, 2007

HENRY PROSECUTOR WAS WR-WR-WR-INCORRECT?

WKRC-TV reports that there's now a chance that Bengals receiver Chris Henry has not tested positive for opiates.

Garry Edmondson, a prosecutor in Kenton County, Kentucky, said earlier on Monday that Henry had tested positive. But now Edmondson is signing a different song.

He now says that one result was negative (which is positive) and the other result is pending.

Edmondson wouldn't say who told him that there was a positive result.

That's why I said in an earlier post that I would reserve judgement until further evidence is presented....
 

Jarv

Loud pipes saves lives.
Messages
13,792
Reaction score
8,662
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Rumor has it he dipped whole wheat cookies into skim milk, basically the same problem Richard Pryor had.
 

BouncingCheese

Stay out of my Bidness
Messages
1,704
Reaction score
0
WoodysGirl;1505109 said:
POSTED 1:34 p.m. EDT, May 21, 2007

HENRY PROSECUTOR WAS WR-WR-WR-INCORRECT?

WKRC-TV reports that there's now a chance that Bengals receiver Chris Henry has not tested positive for opiates.

Garry Edmondson, a prosecutor in Kenton County, Kentucky, said earlier on Monday that Henry had tested positive. But now Edmondson is signing a different song.

He now says that one result was negative (which is positive) and the other result is pending.

Edmondson wouldn't say who told him that there was a positive result.

hehe I wonder who Henry paid off for that negative test result; hehe but seriously I hope that he did test negative.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
BouncingCheese;1505104 said:
Goodell is going to start making it VERY easy for teams to let go of players like Henry if they act up regardless of contract situations and possible cap hits me thinks....

There is no way Goodell is going to let teams off the hook for giving big contracts out to guys who turn turd. You gave them the contract and you need to pay for it. The team is responsible for that deal. Bad decisions are bad decisions. You don't get a pass because you were stupid.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
BouncingCheese;1505119 said:
hehe I wonder who Henry paid off for that negative test result; hehe but seriously I hope that he did test negative.

Wasn't there a Seinfeld episode where George's test came back negative and he thought it was a bad thing. Maybe the person who initially reported it as failed drug test didn't know what a negative test meant. Just kidding, but it sounds like it will be a mess for someone no matter what the real results. A positive test is bad for Henry. A negative test is bad for whomever leaked it as a failed test for opiates.
 

Big Dakota

New Member
Messages
11,876
Reaction score
0
Report: Bengals' Henry failed drug test
function BlogThisStoryTools() { var headline = "Report: Bengals' Henry failed drug test"; var url = document.location.href; var destination = "http://blogs.foxsports.com/BlogThis.aspx?r_title=" + escape(headline) + "&r_url=" + url; //alert(destination); //return; window.location.href = destination; } Story Tools: Print Email Blog This
FOXSports.com
Posted: 21 minutes ago // front-end hack to remove postedTime from Rumors page until a better way can be determined if (document.URL.indexOf("/name/FS/rumors") != -1 && document.getElementById("postedTime") != null) document.getElementById("postedTime").style.display = 'none';
if(fanid.length > 0 && typeof(nflDefaultLeague)!= "undefined") { leagueId = nflDefaultLeague; //find teamId of default league (if exists) for(var i=0; i < teamsInfo.length; i++){ if(teamsInfo[4] == leagueId){ defaultTeamId = teamsInfo[0]; } } var fantasyLeaguePlayerJsPath = 'http://msn.foxsports.com' + '/nugget/200002_' + leagueId + '|||' + fanid; } Maybe Chris Henry didn't quite understand Roger Goodell's message.

A Cincinnati TV station is reporting that the Bengals wideout failed a court-ordered drug test and could be headed to jail. However, Henry's agent denied the claim.
The receiver is already suspended for eight games in the upcoming season under the NFL commissioner's new get-tough policy for repeat offenders.
A Kenton County prosecutor told WLWT the test was part of a probation agreement with Florida for a weapons conviction last fall. Henry is on probation for two years for pulling a 9 mm gun during a fight in downtown Orlando.
Violating the probation could put Henry behind bars. In addition to being on probation in Florida, Henry is serving suspended sentences in both Kentucky and Ohio. The drug test failure could potentially trigger these sentences as well.
However, Henry's agent told the Cincinnati Enquirer that Henry did not fail the drug test.
"The final result is negative," said Marvin Frazier. "It's all (nonsense)."
Frazier said that Bengals player relations director Eric Ball told him that the final test was negative.
Ken Easterling, a Kenton County prosecutor, told the Enquirer that initial results indicated that Henry failed a drug test. However, Easterling stressed that Kenton County is awaiting final analysis from the Kentucky state lab.
"We cannot confirm or deny (Henry's test sample) contains a controlled substance," he said.
The Bengals released a statement today: "For Chris Henry to return playing NFL football, the Bengals understand that he must comply with certain legal and NFL-related procedures. To date, to the Club's knowledge, Chris has been complying with those procedures, and the Club is not aware at this point of any circumstance in which Chris has not complied with his obligations. "With respect to the Northern Kentucky proceedings, reports to date may not be based on complete information. More information is expected to be made available shortly, once all the procedural tests are complete, and the Club will await any action until that information has been released."
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
I am a bigger idiot then Henry.........I used to hope he would be a Cowboy!

I am done with that thought......
 

BouncingCheese

Stay out of my Bidness
Messages
1,704
Reaction score
0
joseephuss;1505172 said:
Wasn't there a Seinfeld episode where George's test came back negative and he thought it was a bad thing. Maybe the person who initially reported it as failed drug test didn't know what a negative test meant. Just kidding, but it sounds like it will be a mess for someone no matter what the real results. A positive test is bad for Henry. A negative test is bad for whomever leaked it as a failed test for opiates.

Maybe the Episode where Elaine had tested positive for Opiates, but I was because she was such a lover of poppie-seeded bagels, and that she ate them in such large quantities that is what made her test positive. Is that what you meant?

I hope Thiesmann leaked the story... I don't know how he could have done it but I am still crossing my fingers for it haha.
 
Top