Chris Whaley

[unionjack8]

listed on todays rookie camp roster at 6'3" 295lbs.
thats impressive, thought he was about 270

Broaddus just tweeted the roster but i cant link to it

 

[reddyuta]

Wow,he was a RB too.

 

[Wolf2k5]

Brent replacement possibly? Or is he considered a 3 tech?

 

[xwalker]

listed on todays rookie camp roster at 6'3" 295lbs.
thats impressive, thought he was about 270

Broaddus just tweeted the roster but i cant link to it

Whaley was 269 pre-draft, but was reported to be as high as 295 in college. The Roster on DC.com says 272.

 

[speedkilz88]

I think he dropped weight after the knee injury and now hopefully he has it back.

 

[speedkilz88]

It highly doubtful that Broaddus has a roster with accurate weights.

Whaley was 269 pre-draft, but was reported to be as high as 295 in college. The Roster on DC.com says 272.

I think they weigh them when they show up and get their gear.

 

[JohnsKey19]

I posted here last week that the ESPN roster had him listed at 295 for a few weeks. Maybe longer but I noticed it then.

 

[jimmy40]

very, very good athlete and a hometown boy from a good family. I really hope it works out for him.

 

[Zordon]

very, very good athlete and a hometown boy from a good family. I really hope it works out for him.

he's my boy from college. whaley will be in the rotation this year. just watch folks.

 

[Avery]

One thing's for sure, Whaley has an easier road to the 53 than most others.

 

[jimmy40]

he's my boy from college. whaley will be in the rotation this year. just watch folks.

well here you go

 

[speedkilz88]

I posted here last week that the ESPN roster had him listed at 295 for a few weeks. Maybe longer but I noticed it then.

It's possible it's from his old Texas listing.

 

[darthseinfeld]

Much better prospect then Bishop IMO

 

[speedkilz88]

Much better prospect then Bishop IMO

Whaley has better pass rush potential.
Bishop is more a 1T and Whaley is more a 3T.

 

[darthseinfeld]

Whaley has better pass rush potential.
Bishop is more a 1T and Whaley is more a 3T.

Oh I know, I was just saying in general. Whaley has 3 down potential at 3 Tech. We would be very very lucky or very very misfortunate to have Bishop even be a 2 down 1 Tech

 

[ABQcowboyJR]

Whaley has better pass rush potential.
Bishop is more a 1T and Whaley is more a 3T.

Whaley will be a 3-tech, no doubt in my mind.

 

[Alexander]

 

[EPL0c0]

thing about guys like Whaley is that if he's willing to put in the work, he's got the right coaching there in Dallas to get the most out of him. Even if he's a backup, quality depth matters down the stretch.

 

[KingintheNorth]

I don't think he makes the team.

 

[KingintheNorth]

I don't think he makes the team.

Okay, I just saw the Brent thread and I take it back.