Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,834
- Reaction score
- 103,557
Not a fan of building the final 53 this way at all.
You and me both!
Vet minimum on a 60-man roster maybe, but not this way.
Not a fan of building the final 53 this way at all.
I use Google to search most web sites. If you have not done so like this then give it a try. Here is an example of doing a google search for this exact thread.
site:cowboyszone.com Ciskowski: Magee, Hamilton and Heath are the 3 best UDFAs
I agree. I'd hate for us to lose potential Safety talent in order to keep a good ST guy that's proven he isn't a good Safety.
Ciskowski has 17 scouts in camp to evaluate players, check pigeons, and watch 8 track tapes. I keep up with all the latest technology, so there.
Don't underestimate the value of a very good ST player.
Nope. But I think we should prioritize a position that's given us fits for a decade and one that will see the field more than ST.
A player that played the way McCray did last year doesn't deserve a roster spot period. He's liability city if he's ever called on to play safety, and you'd be hard pressed to remember a good ST play he's made to deserve the title of Special Teams guru.
Give me players that can contribute on Offense/Defense AND Special Teams, not McCray who can't do either.