Clarence Hill and Hellman nugget on Dak cracking under pressure

His Rookie year there was never a real instance where things were put on his shoulder until maybe that GB game. Remember his rookie year it was run heavy with Dak playing a very secondary role in operating that offense. The more they added to his plate the worst he got.
That is why Dallas is dead set on running the ball and getting more balanced.
 
The same was true of Romo. It's not coincidence that he had his best season as a pro with Murray putting up the most prolific season ever for a Cowboys RB.
The less the ball is any QBs hands via throwing (outside of maybe Dan Marino or Payton Manning) the better. This is a general fact of football. When a QB is throwing too much it usually means the team is down or unbalanced, both conditions not conducive to winning. Romo also threw 34 TDs that year, not much less than his maximum, but only threw 9 picks. Throwing it less means less chance of interceptions and that the team is scoring well in other ways too.
 
blah blah blah

there is a excuse for every thing

dak is a bum always have been always will be and no escuse will change that FACT

cowboys will never win a super bowl with him because he is a bozo BUM

and he is also a giant phony and his leadership is the most overrated thing ever

a great leader does not let his entire team no show for a playoff game can we have a little common sense here
 
Yeah, and once again, Jerry runs the org as a casual fan would.

If a QB is not going to take you there, trade him while he has value and move on. Philly/Wentz. Rams/Goff.

This "Who will you replace him w/" is strictly a fan line of thinking, not to be employed by the GM of a football team.
Philly and the Rams had a plan in place. I wonder what plan Dumb and Dummer can cook up.
 
That is why Dallas is dead set on running the ball and getting more balanced.
Oh I think that's a good thing. Problem is when the opponent stacks the box do we have a QB can that make them pay? He couldn't do that in his rookie season and a decade in the league his rookie season is his best season.
 
I'm not sure is, the talk of him and it's his 10th season we should be focusing on how good he's been and his success, we're talking about him now like he's a 2 year starter with much more to learn!! How many more justifications can we make for him, it's time to see him for what he is, until he somehow proves us wrong in these next few years
At this point he is what he is - a poopy QB
 
Prescott hasn’t been the same since the injury against NE.

Add in no run or run defense, holes in the o-line, terrible receivers (save for one, maybe two), and a scheme so simplistic other defenses knew the plays better than Cowboy players, you wind up with a team that beats up on bad teams but doesn’t have the depth or discipline to beat well coached teams.
 
“Toe to toe” with Rodgers, against a garbage GB defense and secondary with a WR running wide open that is no longer here.. at home to being down close to 20 pts in the first half..

And Seattle was Zeke and the OL completely wearing down the Seattle defense…. Both no longer here…
 
He can't. Playing even a bit more aggressively exposes his fatal flaws.
Right on the money…

Dak “stared down the SEC” in his 4th year by sucking it up, not being able to beat any ranked team and was padding stats in garbage time, like he does here
 
I honestly believe there is a correlation between the FO's diminishing confidence in him and an aggressive upgrade to the run game. It's just me, but I see them indirectly admitting that the less the ball is in his hand, the better.
Six months ago, they made him the highest paid player ever. In those six months since, we have not upgraded our run game at all.
 
I will say this........some say it's him, others say he doesn't have enough talent around him. I don't know which it is but can both be true? Here's what I do know.......he played the GB like a free-agent rookie when ALL the marbles were aligned in his favor. There was no excuse for that whether you have a good or bad team and frankly I'm not sure he will ever recover from that gam


I think Hellman is a nasty little guy but he is sport on here. How can anyone argue differently?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
463,884
Messages
13,775,314
Members
23,769
Latest member
1977fan
Back
Top