BoysFan4ever
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- 3,510
I hate the Seahawks. That's all.
Oh, for God's sake...
It was not, repeat not, a legal block. It's an inherently dangerous hit, for reasons that should be immediately obvious.
Tate started the sequence several yards farther upfield than Lee was, therefore Lee was considered to be a defenseless player in that situation.
If the play had been officiated correctly (Tate s/h/b penalized while Carter should not), Seattle would have been looking at 2nd and 20+ from their own 10 yard line ahead by 14 with most of the 4th qtr remaining. If they don't pick up the 1st Dallas is likely getting the ball around midfield. If the Boys go down and get a td you're looking at a one posession game with half the 4th qtr left.
If that had happened and Seattle had wound up losing, would Tate be crowing about his great hit?
if their reaction to reading that is anything like their reaction immediately following the play, then nobody will get upset.
guys this type of "bullying" has become commonplace from our opponents the last 5 years b/c of the robotic personality of this team at times (yes, i'm speaking of ware especially). hopefully this changes with some of the new players.
Sam Hurd slobberknocked the hell out of Adam Archuletta when Dallas played the Bears in like 2007 and I'd bet anything it was loved by nearly all on this board.
It's called a "cheap shot" for a reason and it doesn't earn you anything but the ire of every other competitor.
I don't see how anyone can look upon the Seahawks favorably right now though. With their unearned arrogance and rampant PED use they should be the laughing stock of professional sports.
I know I'm in the clear minority on that play, but I had almost no problem with that block. He might have hit the helmet, but, otherwise, he came in low, and square up in Lee's chest, and Lee just didn't see him because he was so focussed on the Wilson. It was a brutal hit, but a great block and, mostly, just football.
Wow, I can't believe I am doing this -- that should have been a penalty. It looked to me like Tate used the crown of his helmet as a weapon (launched himself into Lee). If Lee had been a receiver and Tate a saftey -- that is most definitely a defenseless receiver incident.
I don't particularly like the rule, but that's what it is right now...
I hate the Seahawks. That's all.
The helmet hit isn't as big a deal as the fact that Tate was going the opposite direction of the football. That in and of itself is against the rules.
But, you know, replacement refs.
If karma is a wheel, wont be too long until golden tate gets darryl jackson'ed.
might as well flip a coin to see what penalty is called.
Truth is, there's no enforcer on this team. They play well enough to win games but hey do it without any sort of attititude. I'm hoping Kiffin & Marinelli's defense will change all that and set the tone for our games.
Rat's an enforcer. Church might be, too, I think. Victim of Tate's block or not, Sean Lee has great leadership skills. He's not a physically dominating guy, though.
Offensively, I think Frederick is just what we've been needing as far as nastiness on the OL goes. And Dez has the swagger.
Enforcers come about naturally when your team starts winning the big games. Control the turnovers, we'll win the games. And suddenly people aren't going to know where all this swagger came from, after all. The same thing started happening in 2007 when we started the year with a run of victories.
Good point esp with Church. Rat can be beast but I don't think he really scares anyone with his hits. Same thing with Ware and Lee -- you'll get the perfect wrap up tackle, maybe a turnover -- good solid football but not anything that puts fear into opposing players. One of the biggest reasons why our team never gets respect IMHO. I'm actually hoping Bruce Carter will emerge. Kid brings the violent type hits that this D needs.
I didn't have a problem with it.