bbgun;2703742 said:
Asked what the Bills are getting in Terrell Owens, Phillips did nothing but toss bouquets T.O.'s way, describing him as "all the things you want in a football player,'' and "probably the most productive receiver in the league in the last several years.''
Just going by those two things, Phillips didn't state since single thing about TO that is not a well known fact.
If you are looking for what you want in a football player, he is everything you could want. He works harder than just about anyone else in football, he NEVER takes a play off, and is MORE than willing to do what ever you ask, including being a great blocker as a WR.
He also said that TO was probally the most productive WR in football the last two years. Once again, the complete truth, if you look at his stats alone, few can compare, especially in back to back years.
The thing that Phillips never did say thought was anything about the type of team mate that TO was. He said nothing about how good of a football player that TO was. Wade Phillips knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he answered the question, he took the high road and sounded fully complimentary of TO, but deliberately choose his words so as not to say anything that wasn't 100% the truth.
Notice the subtle but HUGE difference between what Jerry says about TO, and what Banks is saying Phillips said. When Jerry talks, he says what a great player that TO was in Dallas, ect. Notice that Phillips never said anything about TO as a player, but that he is everything you want in a football player. All football coaches use the everything you can want in a football player all the time. And it is used to describe someone who is the first to arrive a practice, the last to leave, someone who never takes plays off, and how is always willing to do the dirty work. It is also OFTEN used to describe people who are not great athletes or put up great numbers.
Really, if you spend the time to read between the lines, Phillips infact IS taking a shot a TO, but in an EXTREMELY PC way. He said that he is everything you want in a football player, normally a statement reserved by coaches for players that are not the most talented, and do not put up huge stats. But deliberately left out (or some Banks implies), the last part of the statement when coaches usually use the everything you could want in a football player
AND TEAMMATE. The second shot that Phillips takes is at TO skills as a whole. By using the statement that TO is everything you could want in a football player, he is saying that TO's skills were not that special. And the double shot was saying that while his skills were not that great anymore, he still had great stats. You don't have to be real smart to figure out what he is getting at with that statement. That TO always commanding the ball is why his stats are what they were, not because of his great skills.