TwoDeep3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,748
- Reaction score
- 17,778
I was driving yesterday and heard a comment on 105.3 in Dallas. They were quoting a sports analyst - unfortunately I didn't get his name.
He - the analyst - was speaking about the Cleveland Browns firing Hue Jackson and Todd Haley. The school of thought was that the Browns knew bringing along Baker Mayfield needed a head coach who could groom the rookie.
Neither Jackson or Haley had the skills to make this kid a winner, so the Browns thought.
That started me thinking about Dallas and Garrett and Dak.
I concede Dak has accuracy issues. He needs a clean field of vision and protection for his accuracy to be maximized. Saw Romo talking about his rise to become who he was and in college the head coach told him he wasn't all that accurate. Romo worked on throwing with accuracy from every platform - read angle of ball delivery - and improved to the point he won the starting job.
Perhaps what is needed is a head coach that can bring Dak along, work him on the different delivery platforms and to maximize his talents.
It would also help strengthening the offensive line to the level of 2016. But Dak needs to win the battle between him and the defensive coordinators who throw numbers to overwhelm the line and move Dak out of his comfort zone.
And this goes back to receivers getting open.
Returning to the point of this thread, while we all have reasons for liking or disliking Garrett, perhaps the more accurate tact in his stay or leave is his ability to bring out the best in Dak, and make him a winner.
I don't believe Garrett has that ability, nor does Kellen Moore impress me as a guy that can inspire a player to be the best he can be.
Opinions?
He - the analyst - was speaking about the Cleveland Browns firing Hue Jackson and Todd Haley. The school of thought was that the Browns knew bringing along Baker Mayfield needed a head coach who could groom the rookie.
Neither Jackson or Haley had the skills to make this kid a winner, so the Browns thought.
That started me thinking about Dallas and Garrett and Dak.
I concede Dak has accuracy issues. He needs a clean field of vision and protection for his accuracy to be maximized. Saw Romo talking about his rise to become who he was and in college the head coach told him he wasn't all that accurate. Romo worked on throwing with accuracy from every platform - read angle of ball delivery - and improved to the point he won the starting job.
Perhaps what is needed is a head coach that can bring Dak along, work him on the different delivery platforms and to maximize his talents.
It would also help strengthening the offensive line to the level of 2016. But Dak needs to win the battle between him and the defensive coordinators who throw numbers to overwhelm the line and move Dak out of his comfort zone.
And this goes back to receivers getting open.
Returning to the point of this thread, while we all have reasons for liking or disliking Garrett, perhaps the more accurate tact in his stay or leave is his ability to bring out the best in Dak, and make him a winner.
I don't believe Garrett has that ability, nor does Kellen Moore impress me as a guy that can inspire a player to be the best he can be.
Opinions?

