Beast_from_East;3515645 said:Dude, what makes your argument laughable is that you are contradicting your own self. In your previous post, you named the top 5 QBs in the NFL as Brady, Manning, Brees, Rogers and Phillup Rivers. You said Romo as an "average franchise QB".
Rivers career completion %.......63.1
Romo's...................................63.4
Rivers career passer rating........95.8
Romo's...................................95.6
Rivers total career TD passes.....106
Romo's....................................107
Their completion percentage is almost identical, their passer ratings are almost identical, and their TD passes are almost identical. These are the 3 most important stats for QBs.
Yet you claim Rivers is "top 5" and Romo is not. Would you like to explain to the board how you came to this conclusion since the statistics do not support your claim. What exactly are you basing this conclusion on other than just your own personal opinion, because the stats say Romo and Rivers are almost identical Qbs. So how can the stats be identical and you say one is top 5 and the other isnt????
AmarilloCowboyFan;3515977 said:I like Rodgers but those guys constantly gushing over him was sickening. They sounded like he had already won 3 Super Bowls.
Rampage;3515866 said:Rodgers didn't fumble a hold for a potential game winning fg
There's definitely some that fell on the quarterback and the protection unit. A number of them could have been avoided, clearly. He had some plays that he's gonna wish he had back. We didn't call a lot of plays where we were holding the ball. That was part of the design. When you play up there in that noise, they're playing a little bit downhill on you when they know it's a pass. I think that's evident to everybody. Holding the ball sometimes is not what we want to do.
He only has three reads in the whole offense. He has what we refer to as a pure progression read, where you create a triangle with the pass concept, and I tell him exactly who 1, 2 and 3 are. You either throw it to 1, 2 or 3. The second read is the progression or an option. You throw it to 1, 2 or 3, or there's an option built in based on the coverage. And the third read is what we refer to as a PSL, pre-snap look, that tells you to work one side or the other. So when you stay in tune with that, the time clock fits, and it's tied to the protection. Those are the types of things that are very basic...They did some different things with their coverage as far as holding their safeties and things. But you have to trust the read, trust the read, and that didn't happen all the time.
InmanRoshi;3516073 said:No he just fumbled in overtime in the playoffs, which Karlos Dansby scooped up for the game winning touchdown. You probably wouldn't remember that becuase ESPN doesn't replay it 100000 times during the offseason like they do Romo's dropped field goal.
Maybe it's just a case of dog bites man, because Rodgers fumbles the ball so often ... a whopping 19 times in his two years as a starter. To go along with a mindboggling 84 sacks in the last two years as a starter, because he holds onto the ball FOORRREEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRR. Even his coaches call him out on it. People go on and on about how he doesn't throw many interceptions or incompletions ... yeah, because he waits and waits and waits and doesn't throw the ball. The sacks don't count against his QB rating and efficiency stats, and neither do the fumbles. They still kill drives all the same, which is why he barely has a .500 record as a starter, even though he inherited a 13-3 team.
He's 7-9 in his career on the road. Those 7 wins came vs. teams that were a combined 29-83 and one of those wins was vs. a Cardinal team last year resting their starters in the last game of the season. The teams he beat on the road: Rams, Lions, Browns, Bears, Cards, Lions, Seahawks. Romo has a career 19-8 road record.
If you want to put up a lot of gawdy stats on the Lions and Bears, Rodgers is your man. If you want to go into a tough environment on the road and win a game when the chips are down .. not so much.
Idgit;3516154 said:Preseason performance is indicative of *nothing*. Why must we go through this every year, with even the smart posters getting sucked in eventually?
InmanRoshi;3516193 said:So I guess you're not watching a single Cowboys preseason game, since it's a complete waste of time and you can't read anything into them?
cowboyvic;3515593 said:Just watch the two of them play.Romo is a very good QB. Rodgers is a special player. it's not about that they have won right now. it's about upside.every team in the NFL would take Rodgers over Romo in my opinion. i even think the Cowboys would. Rodgers is that good.
InmanRoshi;3516073 said:No he just fumbled in overtime in the playoffs, which Karlos Dansby scooped up for the game winning touchdown. You probably wouldn't remember that becuase ESPN doesn't replay it 100000 times during the offseason like they do Romo's dropped field goal.
Maybe it's just a case of dog bites man, because Rodgers fumbles the ball so often ... a whopping 19 times in his two years as a starter. To go along with a mindboggling 84 sacks in the last two years as a starter, because he holds onto the ball FOORRREEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRR. Even his coaches call him out on it (see below). People go on and on about how he doesn't throw many interceptions or incomplete passes ... yeah, because he waits and waits and waits and doesn't pull the trigger unless a guy is outrageously wide open. The sacks don't count against his QB rating and efficiency stats, and neither do the fumbles. They still kill drives all the same and count as turnovers, which is maybe why he barely has a .500 record as a starter even though he inherited a 13-3 team.
He's 7-9 in his career on the road. Those 7 wins came vs. teams that were a combined 29-83 and one of those wins was vs. a Cardinal team last year resting their starters in the last game of the season. The teams he beat on the road: Rams, Lions, Browns, Bears, Cards, Lions, Seahawks. Romo has a career 19-8 road record. If you want to put up a lot of gawdy stats on the Lions and Bears and Rams (he played ridiculously a schedule of ridiculously bad pass defenses last year), Rodgers is your man. If you want to go into a tough environment on the road and win a game when the chips are down .. not so much.
Mike McCarthy after the Vikings sacked Rodgers 8 times in one game...
Bob Sturm is a huge Packers fan and he was saying the other day that he doesn't know why everyone is saying the D will be so much better because they really didn't add anything, lost Jolly to Tha Purple Drank, and... Well, a few other details that I don't remember because I'm not a Pack fan. But he usually knows what he's talking about.chicago JK;3516003 said:I read that their defensive coordinator typically has a drop back year in his second season with a team. Which is odd because you would think the transition to a 3-4 in the first year would be the toughest. Although the Packers have good places in piece on D as well.
Next to next-to-last preseason game the teams do open it up some.ScipioCowboy;3515453 said:Apparently, Rodgers didn't get the memo about being vanilla.
Yeah, Chase Daniel did the same thing a couple of nights ago.urface59;3515583 said:3 touchdowns in one half of a preseason game?
FloridaRob;3516483 said:I read through this and want to add a few points . First off, Rodgers had a ton of sacks early last year and there were SOME that were his fault. But the bulk of the sacks were because both of their tackles were out. As soon as Tauscher and Clifton were able to go the sacks went way down.
is funny.Lastly, Rodgers is special and gifted and smart as any QB that has ever played.
DFWJC;3516482 said:Yeah, Chase Daniel did the same thing a couple of nights ago.
Uh, I think I like prefer New Orleans' second year Big12 QB to ours.
We paid the top pick in round 4 and he was undrafted. Oops.