Come Back BP

[Sarge]

I understand what you have outlined, but the next in line will have the same needs and issues as well.

Well, Bill has had 4 years to rectify this and hasn't. So you can justify NOT hiring someone else just becasue the holes are still there? That makes NO sense.

If you follow that mentality - we'll never hire another head coach ever - until Bill is dead, which I happen to think he might already be.

 

[Sarge]

Seems like we are always rebuilding the D.

...but.........isn't defense a strength of Parcells?

 

[Chrissyboy]

Sarge,

you've been here as long as I have (including the previous website incarnations) and I have always admired your posts. I think on the face of it, I agree with the list below:

Need at least 3 OL.
Need a WR.
Need at least 2 DL.
Need at the very least 1 LB if not 2.
Need another CB.
Need AT LEAST 1 S.
QB???????

...but I think the defence will fall into line. I think with a more dynamic scheme we have the players. i still have faith that Watkins is growing as a player. If we can cure the FS position, I think the rest will fall back into place.

I always believe that OLs and DLs need churning.

I'm not sold on the hype of Romo - but he will be a serviceable vet and I wouldnt rate him as a major weakness.

An injection of fresh talent at WR would be greatly appreciated whether TO stays or goes.

 

[morasp]

It has to be coaching. All you have to do is look at what New Orleans is doing with our rejects. Has anyone mentioned the possibility of Mora coaching our defense?

 

[Sarge]

Sarge,

you've been here as long as I have (including the previous website incarnations) and I have always admired your posts. I think on the face of it, I agree with the list below:



...but I think the defence will fall into line. I think with a more dynamic scheme we have the players. i still have faith that Watkins is growing as a player. If we can cure the FS position, I think the rest will fall back into place.

I always believe that OLs and DLs need churning.

I'm not sold on the hype of Romo - but he will be a serviceable vet and I wouldnt rate him as a major weakness.

An injection of fresh talent at WR would be greatly appreciated whether TO stays or goes.

Appreciate the sentiment. I am not as optimistic with regard to the defense. We HAVE to get more pressure on the QB or we are in for a LONG year next year. In line with that, we can't cover deep which in conjunction with not getting pressure on the QB, is a disaster. Like many have said, New Orleans exposed us and the problems on D are very real. We are slow, old at CB, terrible at FS, horrible at DT.

The OL is a mess - we agree there.

I'm not sold on Romo either. His mechanics have diminished each passing week. He's throwing off the wrong foot, fumbling and basically looking like a sandlot player at times. Perhaps, that is a result of poor passblocking - perhaps not.

All I know for sure is, I have the SAME EXACT FEELING TODAY, THAT I'VE HAD AT THE END OF EACH OF THE LAST 4 SEASONS UNDER BP.

 

[dragon_mikal]

You do realize that BP has essentially a .500 average here right? That's not in his first year, that is in his 4 year tenure here. There are as many holes to fill now as when he got here, or damn close to it.

Need at least 3 OL.
Need a WR.
Need at least 2 DL.
Need at the very least 1 LB if not 2.
Need another CB.
Need AT LEAST 1 S.
QB???????

Let me put it this way, we're it not for Romo's hot streak, we would have finished 6-10, 7-9. Our defense is a disaster - you know - the one BP insisted upon and drafted for etc and etc. and etc..