Commanders are better than Dallas now

No they're not.. they're just extremely lucky and are playing a last place schedule. When the Cowboys play them we will beat them by 3 scores. Write it down.
You are kidding right ? Your homerism is blinding …. The commanders are better than us at all three phases of football. And let’s say they have an off day and we do beat them in a single game , that does not mean we are better overall this season. It’s ok Ronnie to admit they hey finally we might not be that good and changes are needed.
 
Commanders suck too. Unfortunately the Eagles are the team to beat. Commanders are just pretending to be good I’ve seen these type of teams before. Eagles consistently have been good.
I think the Commanders are going to destroy philly because their line backers won’t be able to keep up with Daniels running . Division play can’t come soon enough so we all have a bigger idea of how the season will play out.
 
I think the Commanders are going to destroy philly because their line backers won’t be able to keep up with Daniels running . Division play can’t come soon enough so we all have a bigger idea of how the season will play out.
I agree. It’s gonna explain a lot in this division. Can’t wait…..
 
Until Jayden gets hurt from running too much. Someone needs to teach that kid to run only when absolutely necessary. He's looking at a short career if he keeps up this running trash game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G2
Until Jayden gets hurt from running too much. Someone needs to teach that kid to run only when absolutely necessary. He's looking at a short career if he keeps up this running trash game.
It's nearly a certainty with running QBs.
 
Nobody believes your bull crap fake tough guy ........ disappear again and come up with more stories on how rich and tough you are "lil guy" :laugh:
The Dakolytes are denying their longstanding love for #4 like the Apostle Peter denying Christ, lol.

Or the rats jumping off the Titanic for our agnostic friends here , respectfully
 
The Dakolytes are denying their longstanding love for #4 like the Apostle Peter denying Christ, lol.

Or the rats jumping off the Titanic for our agnostic friends here , respectfully
And then a cock crowed...

Dakolytes after ANY SF game: "I swear to you I don't know the man!!!"
 
Look at how many years and failed first round picks it took for Washington to finally hit on a QB. You’re one of those who thinks just use a first round pick on a QB and BINGO! :rolleyes:
To be fair, they hit on RG3. If he didn't have the injuries, he might be starting his 12th season with the Commodes now. In a sense, they also hit on Cousins in the same draft. If they kept Cousins and put a decent team around him, they wouldn't have been a 10-year dumpster fire. Bad management at its finest. TBH, I would not have drafted RG3, as I never believed he would stay healthy due to the way he ran and how his gait is. Zion Williamson has the same issues.
 
To be fair, they hit on RG3. If he didn't have the injuries, he might be starting his 12th season with the Commodes now. In a sense, they also hit on Cousins in the same draft. If they kept Cousins and put a decent team around him, they wouldn't have been a 10-year dumpster fire. Bad management at its finest. TBH, I would not have drafted RG3, as I never believed he would stay healthy due to the way he ran and how his gait is. Zion Williamson has the same issues.
No. It turned out that RGIII was a terrible passer. Couldn't read a D to save his life. He could run, and that was it. He was going to fail w/ or w/o the injuries.
 
Parcells said you are what your record says you are. I think the Cowboys are better than 3-4, but that doesn't matter. We'll find out who's better when Washington and Dallas play each other.
 
No...you SPECULATED. Try not to give admonitions when you lack a firm grasp of logical argumentation and how to form a logical syllogism. You spent more time on your empty word salad than you did on making a point:

It doesn't matter who was injured or not injured...Dak is an automatic, 2 INT LOSER AGAINST SF. He AVERAGES 2 INTs against them...and the only reason it isn't more is because SF goes into prevent. Speculating on what my reaction "would have been"...is not saying what you see...IT'S IGNORING WHAT YOU SAW TO CREATE A MIRAGE.

Again...if I was "nobody" to you why reach out to "nobody"? Oh I know...anyone who doesn't like you or agree with you is "nobody"...no wonder that closed mind has grown cobwebs.
you going to say all that and then ***** as someone else for a "word salad"?

and i didn't think i was going to laugh this am.
 
To be fair, they hit on RG3. If he didn't have the injuries, he might be starting his 12th season with the Commodes now. In a sense, they also hit on Cousins in the same draft. If they kept Cousins and put a decent team around him, they wouldn't have been a 10-year dumpster fire. Bad management at its finest. TBH, I would not have drafted RG3, as I never believed he would stay healthy due to the way he ran and how his gait is. Zion Williamson has the same issues.
They didn’t hit on RG3. It appeared they hit on him but he ended up a one year wonder who only played 3 seasons in Washington. The injury his rookie year derailed his career. They hit on Cousins but he was 0-3 in the playoffs and never saw a second contract in Washington. Daniels looks like a legit franchise QB who could be Washington’s QB the next 10+ years assuming he doesn’t meet the same fate as RG3.
 
They will certainly be better over the next 5 year window, that's for sure. They have a quality QB on a rookie deal, plenty of money and a real GM who isn't an 82 year old turd along with his kid running the show.
 
They didn’t hit on RG3. It appeared they hit on him but he ended up a one year wonder who only played 3 seasons in Washington. The injury his rookie year derailed his career. They hit on Cousins but he was 0-3 in the playoffs and never saw a second contract in Washington. Daniels looks like a legit franchise QB who could be Washington’s QB the next 10+ years assuming he doesn’t meet the same fate as RG3.
Can't blame him for the injury. That happens. Doesn't mean they didn't hit. It means they were unlucky as hell. But like I said, I wouldn't have drafted him based on his running motion.
 
No. It turned out that RGIII was a terrible passer. Couldn't read a D to save his life. He could run, and that was it. He was going to fail w/ or w/o the injuries.
He wasn't terrible. And passing can be worked on with good coaching. See McNabb for an example. He needed a lot of work his first year.
 
Can't blame him for the injury. That happens.
The injury happened and it caused them to miss on him. It’s possible he goes bust without the injury. Kap looked real good early on and flamed out quick. That sometimes happens with players.
 
The injury happened and it caused them to miss on him. It’s possible he goes bust without the injury. Kap looked real good early on and flamed out quick. That sometimes happens with players.
Missing because the player wasn't good is not the same as missing because a player suffers a terrible injury. Same result in the end for sure, but making the right decision and getting hit with a dose of bad luck is different. If Emmitt had suffered a career-changing injury his second year, does that mean we missed? No, it means we had bad luck. We picked the right player. Just couldn't stay healthy.
 
Missing because the player wasn't good is not the same as missing because a player suffers a terrible injury. Same result in the end for sure, but making the right decision and getting hit with a dose of bad luck is different. If Emmitt had suffered a career-changing injury his second year, does that mean we missed? No, it means we had bad luck. We picked the right player. Just couldn't stay healthy.
Whether you miss on a player because they weren’t good or because of an injury, it’s a miss. Players have gone on to have great careers after the injury RG3 suffered. I think the injury affected his confidence. If any player suffers an injury early in their career that affects their performance causing a team to move on from them, that goes down as a miss. If Emmitt suffered an injury in year one or two and we had to move on it would’ve been a miss.
 
Missing because the player wasn't good is not the same as missing because a player suffers a terrible injury. Same result in the end for sure, but making the right decision and getting hit with a dose of bad luck is different. If Emmitt had suffered a career-changing injury his second year, does that mean we missed? No, it means we had bad luck. We picked the right player. Just couldn't stay healthy.
RG3 injury was brutal. 8(
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,036
Messages
13,785,280
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top