Mansta54
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,945
- Reaction score
- 482
skinsngibbs4life;1123280 said:this coming from the guy who repeats himself over and over agin
What? You mean 2-5 and yall stink!!!!
skinsngibbs4life;1123280 said:this coming from the guy who repeats himself over and over agin
skinsngibbs4life;1123280 said:this coming from the guy who repeats himself over and over agin
5Stars;1123288 said:See, now you are just trying to start a fight...and that's what usually happens when someone is getting owned...
Hostile;1123265 said:One QB in NFL History scored a 50. By your logic he's the best QB ever right?
skinsngibbs4life;1123300 said:When did I ever say that? The only thing I stated was that Campbel's wonderlic wasn't low, he MIGHT NOT be as dumb as some people want to make him out to be.
Being dumb may or may not lead to him washing out if he does. But the Wonderlic has very little to do with inteligence or ability to play the game. Teams use it to get a psychological peek into a player, not to gauage intelligence. That is a common misconception. If they wanted to really gauge a player's intelligance they'd use an LSAT or some other difficult test that requires rationale and logic.skinsngibbs4life;1123300 said:When did I ever say that? The only thing I stated was that Campbel's wonderlic wasn't low, he MIGHT NOT be as dumb as some people want to make him out to be.
Hostile;1123265 said:One QB in NFL History scored a 50. By your logic he's the best QB ever right?
If true I stand corrected. I've seen several mentions of Fitz scoring the 50 and am going on that.StanleySpadowski;1123306 said:Actually Hos, no QB has ever scored a 50. It was widely but erroneously reported that Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a 50 but his actual score was "only" a 38.
Pat McInally, former Bengal P and WR remains as the lone 50 in the Wonderlic's history of testing NFL hopefuls.
skinsngibbs4life;1123222 said:Jason Campbell scored a 28 on his wonderlic
Hostile;1123312 said:The point remains that the Wonderlic doesn't prove anything.
You seem to be saying it proves he isn't dumb.skinsngibbs4life;1123321 said:And I have yet to see anyone in this thread say anything differently
5Stars;1123324 said:What was QC's score?
skinsngibbs4life;1123321 said:And I have yet to see anyone in this thread say anything differently
summerisfunner;1123350 said:Saunders said that Campbell hasn't grasped the playbook, end of story
StanleySpadowski;1123306 said:Pat McInally, former Bengal P and WR remains as the lone 50 in the Wonderlic's history of testing NFL hopefuls.
tomson75;1123421 said:Look Hos, a kicker is the best QB in NFL history!!!
Hostile;1123338 said:You seem to be saying it proves he isn't dumb.
It doesn't prove that, and no I did not just maintain that he is dumb. There is no proof that doing well on the Wonderlic means someone isn't dumb. There is no proof that someone who does poorly is dumb either. The Wonderlic doesn't prove anything.
It never has, it never will. You used it to support your stance. It won't. Period.
A useful tool? Yes. A measure of intelligence? No.StanleySpadowski;1123448 said:The Wonderlic is a useful tool if it's applied properly.
Like any other test, it can be prepped for so the results can be a bit misleading, but it does give a good insight into a player's reading skills and thought processes.
You can't really look at a player's grades because some schools like Miami and Ohio State have a documented history of illegal assistance for student athletes to keep them eligible.
Where else are you going to look to see if a certain player has the requisite intelligence to play for your team?