I haven't failed at understanding anything. I'm explaining to you that just becuase the headline of the original article says one thing. If you KNOW that it doesn't fit the content of the blurb you're posting, then you should consider changing your thread title accordingly.Gryphon;1487229 said:You fail to realize that I did not write this article nor create this title.
WoodysGirl;1487236 said:I haven't failed at understanding anything. I'm explaining to you that just becuase the headline of the original article says one thing. If you KNOW that it doesn't fit the content of the blurb you're posting, then you should consider changing your thread title accordingly.
WoodysGirl;1487236 said:I haven't failed at understanding anything. I'm explaining to you that just becuase the headline of the original article says one thing. If you KNOW that it doesn't fit the content of the blurb you're posting, then you should consider changing your thread title accordingly.
Naw, I was the original lazy bastid who didn't change it. Not on you.WoodysGirl;1487227 said:Oh great, make me look bad... : :
Hostile;1487255 said:Naw, I was the original lazy bastid who didn't change it. Not on you.
~looking for Yeager's ban button~smarta5150;1487256 said:I disagree.
WG was one of those peanut heads I was talking about
WoodysGirl;1487262 said:~looking for Yeager's ban button~