Commanders | Portis wants to win a ring or two

[5Stars]

Not the current coaching staff.

Oh...! So the coachs are gonna lace um up and play? Damn, that Lil Snyder thinks of everything, huh? Poor coaches! I hope their still in some football shape...!

Hey! Quick question that is EASY to answer, this time!

Is Lil Snyder gonna charge you sheep to come see training camp this year? :laugh1:

What about popcorn? How much does he charge for that?

Damn, I'm glad JJ don't make their coaches suit up...

Get it, sickone?

THE COACHES DON'T PLAY...they can be the most brilliant people on the planet...but, when you don't have the players to make it work...? Now what?

You RedStinks also have a completely new system coming this year...right? (can you answer that little question)?

Coach Tuna, has had his system in place for, what, 4 years? St. Gibbs is hiring everyone he can to help him coach your team...

OK? LOGIC TIME...for you, sickone...

Which team might have more continuity...as a team...in the current systems that the RedStinks and the Dallas Cowboys are going to come into this coming year?

(this should be interesting).....

 

[illone]

OK? LOGIC TIME...for you, sickone...

You don't get to chose when it's logic time for anyone until you show you are able to comprehend it yourself.

Also, you don't need to keep up with the lame insults to 'attempt' to make a point. All it does is make you look stupid and it certainly doesn't add to the conversation at hand. You hate the Commanders. That's plain for everyone to see. You have nothing to prove, now. Either add something of value here or just move on. The rest of us are tired of your stupid emoticon filled posts that have absolutely no point at all.

 

[5Stars]

You don't get to chose when it's logic time for anyone until you show you are able to comprehend it yourself.

Also, you don't need to keep up with the lame insults to 'attempt' to make a point. All it does is make you look stupid and it certainly doesn't add to the conversation at hand. You hate the Commanders. That's plain for everyone to see. You have nothing to prove, now. Either add something of value here or just move on. The rest of us are tired of your stupid emoticon filled posts that have absolutely no point at all.

So, that's what your think about yourself?

Now, I get it...!

 

[illone]

Excellent comeback. I guess I shouldn't have expected more from you.

 

[Hostile]

Not the current coaching staff.

Yes, this franchise does know more about Super Bowls than the Skins current coaching staff.

Do the math.

 

[illone]

Yes, this franchise does know more about Super Bowls than the Skins current coaching staff.

I wasn't comparing franchise to franchise, all time. Simply put our current coaching staff has more SuperBowl experience than your current coaching staff.

Gibbs - 4 Superbowl apperances, and 3 victories.
Parcells - 3 SB appearances and 2 victories.

Gregg Williams - 1 appearance, 0 wins.
Mike Zimmer - 1 appearance, 1 win

Al Saunders - 1 appearance, 1 win

Throw in Joe Bugels 4 appearances and 3 wins and it's not even close.

 

[SultanOfSix]

Why would you count Gibbs' twice by including Bugel's?

 

[apickmans]

Why would you count Gibbs' twice by including Bugel's?

Was he not a part of the coaching staff during those super bowls? heh but i see your point.

 

[illone]

Why would you count Gibbs' twice by including Bugel's?

Becuase we're using actual superbowl experience and factual analysis in comparing the two coaching staffs to one another.

 

[Mansta54]

Portis SUUUUUCKS!!!!!

 

[illone]

Portis SUUUUUCKS!!!!!

Thanks for your insight and spot on technical analysis.

 

[Mansta54]

Thanks for your insight and spot on technical analysis.

No prob!!!! Here's some more for ya.. Portis SUUUUCKS!!!!

 

[DallasEast]

Gibbs - 4 Superbowl apperances, and 3 victories.
Parcells - 3 SB appearances and 2 victories.

New math:

Super Bowl appearance/victory during non-strike year = 1 point
Super Bowl appearance/victory during strike year = .5 points

Gibbs: .5 + 1 + .5 + 1 = 3 Super Bowl appearances/victories
Parcells: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 Super Bowl appearance/victories

It's a dead heat! :wink3:

 

[SultanOfSix]

Becuase we're using actual superbowl experience and factual analysis in comparing the two coaching staffs to one another.

So what? You're effectively counting Gibbs' rings twice because Bugel's rings are the same as Gibbs'.

 

[illone]

So what? You're effectively counting Gibbs' rings twice because Bugel's rings are the same as Gibbs'.

I'm sorry that's too confusing for you. See the discussion is about Super Bowl experience. Bugel was there, right along Gibbs and his Superbowl experience counts in the discussion because, well, 2 is larger than 1.

 

[Hostile]

I wasn't comparing franchise to franchise, all time. Simply put our current coaching staff has more SuperBowl experience than your current coaching staff.

Gibbs - 4 Superbowl apperances, and 3 victories.
Parcells - 3 SB appearances and 2 victories.

Gregg Williams - 1 appearance, 0 wins.
Mike Zimmer - 1 appearance, 1 win

Al Saunders - 1 appearance, 1 win

Throw in Joe Bugels 4 appearances and 3 wins and it's not even close.

Maybe you weren't, but that's exactly what the premise was that you refuted.

Throw in Jerry Jones' rings, and Stephen Jones' rings. They have played integral roles in 3 Championships you know.

 

[illone]

Throw in Jerry Jones' rings, and Stephen Jones' rings. They have played integral roles in 3 Championships you know.

Clearly. I don't count them in the coaching staff, though.

 

[Hostile]

Clearly. I don't count them in the coaching staff, though.

Of course not because it makes your ridiculous assertion null and void.

Typical.

Bottom line, the "franchise" (meaning the Dallas Cowboys) has more experience building Super Bowl Champions was Doomsday101's contention and on that he is 100% correct.

Jerry and his son are part of that. A big part. Period.

 

[SultanOfSix]

I'm sorry that's too confusing for you. See the discussion is about Super Bowl experience. Bugel was there, right along Gibbs and his Superbowl experience counts in the discussion because, well, 2 is larger than 1.

Actually it's not confusing at all:

This is what was said:

Originally Posted by Doomsday101

This Franchise knows a bit more about winning championships than the skins do.

To which you responded.

Not the current coaching staff.

1) The coaching staff was never originally mentioned.
2) Nowhere in the physics of the universe is "knowing more" about winning championships equated to having more people on your staff who have won championships, especially if two of them existed on the same coaching staff that won those said championships.

 

[superpunk]

Typical Cowboys homer responses, where you actually follow the course of the thread, and use bizarre things like logic to come to informed conclusions.