Commanders safety Taylor has deal in assault case - ESPN.com *MERGED*

boysfanindc

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,227
Reaction score
2,864
Washington Commanders safety Sean Taylor appeared in Miami circuit court Thursday and entered a plea of no contest to misdemeanor assault and battery charges to bring to an end the year-long saga surrounding his arrest one year ago after a street fight in a depressed part of Miami.

The plea agreement included the dismissal of felony assault charges and requires no jail time, and it seemed to represent an extremely favorable outcome in a case in which Taylor faced up to 46 years in prison. Taylor, however, who appeared in court in a tan pin-striped suit and open-neck dress shirt, told the Judge Leonard Glick in a crowded courtroom that he accepted the deal reluctantly.

"This is obviously something that's kind of a hard pill for me to swallow," Taylor, 23, said near the end of the 30-minute hearing after indicating to the judge he wanted to make a statement. "This is not something I think I'm guilty of, [but] so I can move on with my life, and everyone can move on with theirs . . . I accept this."

With the resolution of his legal case, Taylor still faces possible disciplinary action by the NFL, which could fine him or suspend him under its personal conduct policy. Richard Sharpstein, Taylor's lead attorney, said he discussed the plea deal with NFL general counsel Dennis Curran, who indicated that similar cases have resulted in fines and one- or two-game suspensions. Sharpstein said he intended to fax the plea deal to the NFL Thursday.

"We hope they take action quickly -- or not take action quickly," he said.

In addition to the no-contest pleas, Taylor agreed to visit 10 schools in the Miami area during the next 18 months and speak to students about the importance of maintaining self-control and furthering their education. He also agreed to donate a $1,000 educational scholarship to one student at each school and pay $429 in court costs.

"I think this will help me reach some kids and show them this is not the way to be," Taylor said in brief comments after the hearing. "I've got to educate some kids."

Sharpstein, from the Washington-based law firm Jorden Burt, said Taylor flew to Miami over Memorial Day weekend when he learned prosecutor Abe Laeser wanted to meet with Taylor's defense team to discuss the case this week. Taylor, who was accompanied to court by his father Pedro Taylor, the chief of police in Florida City, Fla., will remain in Miami with family through the weekend before joining the Commanders for workouts next week, Sharpstein said.

"He's going to go back and do his job and intercept footballs for the Commanders," Sharpstein said.

Taylor, in brief comments to reporters after the hearing, said weathering the mental strain of the case was "not hard at all." He said the deal was "in the best interest of my family, my friends, me and my team and for what I have to do."

Taylor had been accused of brandishing a gun, making threats and initiating a street fight last June 1 with a group of people he believed were responsible for the theft of his two all-terrain vehicles out of a neighbor's driveway. After Taylor retreated from the fight, his blue GMC Yukon Denali was sprayed with gunfire while it was parked in a neighbor's driveway.

No charges were filed in the shooting incident, but Taylor was charged days later with one count of misdemeanor battery and one count of felony assault with a weapon. The felony charge was tripled in January with the addition of two additional victims to the case, raising the maximum jail time he faced from 16 to 46 years. The three felony charges each carried a minimum three-year sentence.

Sharpstein and his wife Janice Burton Sharpstein argued since they joined Taylor's defense team in February that the charges were overblown and that Taylor had been singled out by a publicity-hungry prosecutor. That prosecutor, Mike Grieco, gave up the case in April after Sharpstein discovered Grieco had links to media reports of the Taylor case on a personal Web site that detailed his exploits as a Miami Beach disc jockey.

"It is unequivocally clear the original prosecutor was ego-driven . . . and wasn't looking at this case for what it was," Sharpstein said.

Said Taylor: "I think [my attorneys] looked out for my best interest and I also looked out for my best interest in this case. I think the plea that was offered is very good and I think I'm able to carry that out with no problem."
 

CooterBrown

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
1,262
MossBurner said:
I don't work for the NFL. All anyone can do is speculate based on punishments for crimes in the past.

From the NFL Office's standpoint, this is what happened:

Sean Taylor pleaded no contest to a street-fight.

There is no way he will be suspended.

I am not familiar with the laws in Florida, but there is probably not much differnce than here in Texas.

Here, a street fight is a Class C offense and is called "Disorderly Conduct".
and can only result in a fine of up to $500.

"Assault" is when you intentionally injure someone and you did not have a legal right to do so. This is a Class A misdemeanor and can result in a year in jail.

That is a pretty significant difference.

And, for what it's worth, the only differnce between a plea of "guilty" and a plea of "no contest" is that the no-contest plea cannot be used against you in any civil law suit that might arise from the same incident. It might sound better, but it really doesn't make any difference in a criminal proceeding.

And, I'm sure you can find someone in Vegas that will take a bet on whether or not Taylor is suspended.

Personally, I don't care one way or the other. Taylor is a good football player, but a strong safety's presence or absence in one or more games won't make any differnce in the outcome of the season.
 

CooterBrown

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
1,262
skinsterp said:
The operative word is 'could'.

Per my ExtremeSkins colleague KevinMac -

If this is indeed "no contest without conviction, " it is NOT a plea bargain, no matter how it is
worded in press releases. The end result, after the probation period, will be the same as if the
case went to trial and Taylor was found not guilty on all counts. He will have zip on his record,
not even a misdemeanor, and the record certainly will not reflect any form of "plea." This is
different than a case being expunged from the record. You see this in legal drug cases (i.e.,
prescriptions) all the time. While gun charges are certainly more serious than buying too many pain
pills, the principle is still the same. At the end of the day it will be as if this whole thing
never happened.
I am sure the NFL will try to suspend Sean, and I'm confident that he will have a solid appeal if
he chooses to follow it. The question will be whether or not the arbiter agrees.
-------------------------------------------------
Personally, I think the NFL will only impose a fine and no suspension.
We'll just have to wait and see.

-skinsterp

As I said in my earlier post, the laws may be different in Florida than Texas, but I seriously doubt there is much difference. And if so, you have been misinformed.
In Texas, when a person goes to trial and is found "not guilty", they can have their record expunged and the arrest and charge are removed from the records of all court and law enforcement agencies.
When a person enters a plea, (see my last post for the relevance of No-contest plea in a criminal proceeding) and is placed on community supervision, they can never have that record expunged, and even though it does not show a conviction, the arrest record, and the court documents are there and will show up on any criminal background check.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
skinsterp said:
The operative word is 'could'.

Per my ExtremeSkins colleague KevinMac -

If this is indeed "no contest without conviction, " it is NOT a plea bargain, no matter how it is
worded in press releases. The end result, after the probation period, will be the same as if the
case went to trial and Taylor was found not guilty on all counts. He will have zip on his record,
not even a misdemeanor, and the record certainly will not reflect any form of "plea." This is
different than a case being expunged from the record. You see this in legal drug cases (i.e.,
prescriptions) all the time. While gun charges are certainly more serious than buying too many pain
pills, the principle is still the same. At the end of the day it will be as if this whole thing
never happened.
I am sure the NFL will try to suspend Sean, and I'm confident that he will have a solid appeal if
he chooses to follow it. The question will be whether or not the arbiter agrees.
-------------------------------------------------
Personally, I think the NFL will only impose a fine and no suspension.
We'll just have to wait and see.

-skinsterp
Sorry, but your colleague KevinMac is only partially correct, as several of you here have been.

He is correct that this is NOT a plea bargain. That means bargaining down to lesser charges.

He is incorrect in saying "At the end of the day it will be as if this whole thing
never happened." That ONLY happens when a judgment of "not guilty" has been secured.

"No contest" does not mean "not guilty." He is being given a probationary period. When you screw up while on probation you are in serious trouble.

As I said before, one night in 18 months of partying too much and not being in control, and he's in a world of trouble.

Cooter Brown's posts on this are dead on the money. Your colleague KevinMac is seeing the bright side and keeping his eyes closed to a lot of facts.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
20060106164509990005


Washington's finest.
 

skinsterp

Member
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hostile said:
Sorry, but your colleague KevinMac is only partially correct, as several of you here have been.

He is correct that this is NOT a plea bargain. That means bargaining down to lesser charges.

He is incorrect in saying "At the end of the day it will be as if this whole thing
never happened." That ONLY happens when a judgment of "not guilty" has been secured.

"No contest" does not mean "not guilty." He is being given a probationary period. When you screw up while on probation you are in serious trouble.

As I said before, one night in 18 months of partying too much and not being in control, and he's in a world of trouble.

Cooter Brown's posts on this are dead on the money. Your colleague KevinMac is seeing the bright side and keeping his eyes closed to a lot of facts.

OK. So where are the facts being ignored? If Taylor stays out of trouble for the 18 month probationary period (not a given, for sure), will that essentially meet the judges criteria and all charges 'disappear'? You can understand 'Skins fans choosing to be optimistic, just as I can understand you wishing and perhaps hoping Taylor slips up again. God help me, but I think Taylor has learned from this past year. We'll see. Incidently, I concur with you on Cooter Brown's post. It's pretty clear that Taylor needs to keep on the straight and narrow.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
skinsterp said:
The operative word is 'could'.

And in the vast majority of incidents involving a violent crime, "could" has resulted in a one-game suspension.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
skinsterp said:
OK. So where are the facts being ignored? If Taylor stays out of trouble for the 18 month probationary period (not a given, for sure), will that essentially meet the judges criteria and all charges 'disappear'? You can understand 'Skins fans choosing to be optimistic, just as I can understand you wishing and perhaps hoping Taylor slips up again. God help me, but I think Taylor has learned from this past year. We'll see. Incidently, I concur with you on Cooter Brown's post. It's pretty clear that Taylor needs to keep on the straight and narrow.
How you can ask what facts are being ignored and in the same post concur with what CooterBrown posted is pretty much a head scratcher there skinterp.

I never told you not to be optimistic. Is it too hard to be factual with your optimism?

Why can't you and your cohorts simply say it like this?

"He needs to get his act together and learn from this. If he sees this as beating the rap it could come back to haunt him. If he sees it as a 2nd chance, maybe he turns his life around."

Please, tell me, what the hell is so hard about that?

Let's get something else straight too. I never wish or hope for athletes (or anyone else for that matter) to screw up. I much prefer to hope that people like Sean will remove their head from the dark orifice with the foul odor and contribute to society rather than being a blight on it.

I now return you to your optimism. Why you'd come to a Cowboys forum expecting to be congratulated for your optimism, is really beyond me.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
skinsfunguy said:
Dude, lawyers are CONSTANTLY trying to get cases thrown out before they happen. Most of the time it doesn't work but its worth a shot. Why do it? Well because its A LOT easier than just going to court. Don't you think?

You obviously have ZERO clue as to what you're talking about. 95% of all cases set for trial settle before going into jury selection.

As for prosecutor misconduct... it rarely happens. For the most part prosecutors are fair. Prosecutors are ethically obligated to seek justice, not to "go after someone" or "make a statement." This is the reason the case settled. It's not like charges were dropped. If the prosecutor listened to all the Commander fans who say Taylor did nothing and had no gun, the charges would have been dropped altogether. And contrary to what you've said, Taylor "could" face jail time. He's on probation, if he violates that, he could easily see jail time. And it will also go on his record. As a misdemeanor yes, but it's still on his record.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
peplaw06 said:
Prosecutors are ethically obligated to seek justice, not to "go after someone" or "make a statement."

Oh really? How do you know, Mr. Bigshot? Are you a lawyer? This Grieco person had AN AGENDA! AND A MYSPACE PAGE!:cool:
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Alexander said:
Oh really? How do you know, Mr. Bigshot? Are you a lawyer? This Grieco person had AN AGENDA! AND A MYSPACE PAGE!:cool:

Yes.

As I said, prosecutor misconduct (what Grieco was accused of) rarely happens... when you take into account how many prosecutors there are across the country. And how many prosecutors are DJ's on the side?? :rolleyes:
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
peplaw06 said:
Yes.

As I said, prosecutor misconduct (what Grieco was accused of) rarely happens... when you take into account how many prosecutors there are across the country. And how many prosecutors are DJ's on the side?? :rolleyes:
Pep, he was taking the role of Skins fan and being outrageously sarcastic.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Hostile said:
Pep, he was taking the role of Skins fan and being outrageously sarcastic.

:bang2: How did I miss that?? I have dealt with Alexander enough... I shoulda known
 

rojan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
143
Commanders' Taylor to Accept a Plea Deal

Felony Charges Will Be Dismissed


By Amy Shipley
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 1, 2006; Page E01
MIAMI, May 31 -- A plea deal has been reached in the felony assault case involving Washington Commanders safety Sean Taylor that ensures Taylor will not spend a day in jail and the felony charges against him will be dismissed, one of Taylor's attorneys said Wednesday.
Taylor, who faced up to 46 years in prison over charges related to a street fight last June, agreed to the plea terms Wednesday, according to attorney Larry R. Handfield, who joined Taylor's defense team in February.

The agreement, which will require the approval of Judge Leonard Glick, will be presented during a hearing Thursday morning in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court at the Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building.
Handfield said Taylor, the Commanders' No. 1 draft pick in 2004, has agreed to plead no contest to one misdemeanor battery charge and one misdemeanor assault charge. The deal includes a withholding of a conviction, Handfield said, and the dismissal of three charges of felony assault with a deadly weapon that each carried a mandatory minimum three-year sentence.
Taylor also agreed to visit 10 schools in the inner city, providing $1,000 to each school, according to Handfield.
Taylor's trial had been scheduled for July 10, about three weeks before the start of Commanders training camp. The deal, if accepted by the judge, would bring an end to a case that included seven delays and threatened to intersect with the upcoming season.
"Even though I was certain he would be vindicated at trial, this avoids the risk associated with any trial," Handfield said. "With the present charges, he was looking at 45 years in prison if he was found guilty. This way, he can be in training camp and put this behind him, close this chapter in his life."
Ed Griffith, a spokesman at the Miami-Dade State Attorney's office, declined to comment.
Taylor's defense team met with prosecutor Abe Laeser on Tuesday and Wednesday, according to Handfield and Taylor's lead attorney, Richard Sharpstein. Sharpstein, an attorney with the Washington-based Jorden Burt firm, declined to comment for this story on whether a deal had been reached.
Laeser is a respected veteran of the state attorney's office who took over the case about six weeks ago after allegations surfaced that the previous prosecutor, Mike Grieco, was using it to promote his side career as a Miami Beach disc jockey. After Grieco stepped down from the case, Taylor's trial was postponed from early May to mid-July.
The charges against Taylor stem from a fight in Miami that occurred last June 1 after Taylor went searching for two all-terrain vehicles he believed had been stolen from him. Police reports and depositions describing the incident said Taylor brandished a gun and issued threats before initiating a fistfight with the man he believed had stolen his property.
After retreating from the fight that involved at least a dozen people, according to depositions and court records, shots were fired into Taylor's GMC Yukon Denali while it was parked at a friend's house.
Days after the incident, Taylor was charged with one count of felony assault and one count of misdemeanor battery, which carry a combined maximum of 16 years in prison. In January, the prosecution brought two other felony charges, each adding another possible 15 years imprisonment.
Taylor acknowledged that a fight occurred but claimed it was prompted by the prosecution's main alleged victim, Ryan Hill, according to Ed Carhart, one of Taylor's attorneys. Taylor said Hill, against whom Taylor played high school football in Miami, attempted to force his way into Taylor's Denali and then threw Taylor to the ground, Carhart said.
Carhart also said Taylor denied waving a weapon.
Carhart did not return a call seeking comment Wednesday but said last week the case "weighs heavily on [Taylor] and is very frustrating for him. This is not easy to go through. If a jury decides to convict him, the judge has to give him three years at least."
Taylor's agent, Drew Rosenhaus, could not be reached. Taylor was credited last season with 80 tackles, third-most among the Commanders, two interceptions, three forced fumbles and one sack. Taylor attended Gulliver Prep in Miami. His father, Pedro Taylor, is chief of police in Florida City, Fla.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
peplaw06 said:
:bang2: How did I miss that?? I have dealt with Alexander enough... I shoulda known

When in doubt, assume sarcasm.:cool:
 

Cajuncowboy

Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Messages
27,499
Reaction score
81
What a weasel.

MIAMI -- Washington Commanders safety Sean Taylor reached an agreement with prosecutors to drop felony charges against him and pleaded no contest Thursday to two misdemeanors in an assault case, avoiding any jail time that might have derailed his NFL career.

Sean Taylor
AP Photo/Yesikka Vivancos
While pleading no contest, Sean Taylor, left, still believes he didn't do anything wrong.

The deal calls for Taylor to be placed on 18 months' probation, talk about the importance of education at 10 Miami-Dade County schools and contribute $1,000 for scholarships to each of those schools. He must also pay $429 in court costs.

The 23-year-old Taylor had been scheduled to go to trial on July 10. He had faced a maximum of 46 years in prison if convicted on three aggravated assault charges and one misdemeanor charge stemming from a confrontation last June after his all-terrain vehicles were taken.

"This is a fair and just resolution to this case that was blown out of proportion from the beginning," Taylor attorney Richard Sharpstein said. "It's a great outcome for Sean."

The NFL could still impose a fine or suspend Taylor for one or more games, Sharpstein said, but league officials did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment. The Commanders also declined comment but have publicly supported Taylor in the past.

When Taylor and some friends located the people who had the vehicles, the two sides eventually got into a fight and Taylor hit and shoved at least one person, a prosecutor said in court. Prosecutors had first accused Taylor of pointing a gun during the dispute, but he denied having a weapon. That accusation was dropped in the deal.

Speaking to Miami-Dade County Circuit Judge Leonard Glick, Taylor said the plea was "a hard pill for me to swallow" because "this is not something I think I'm guilty of."

But Taylor added: "I believe it's in my best interest to accept this plea."

Under the plea deal, the aggravated assault charges will be dropped and Taylor pleaded no contest to misdemeanor counts of simple battery and simple assault. If he does not violate probation, those charges would be eliminated from his record.

Taylor, a former University of Miami standout, signed a seven-year, $18 million contract with the Commanders after he was drafted in 2004. He has six interceptions and 120 tackles in two NFL seasons, but has become almost as well-known for his troubles.

Taylor has been fined seven times during his professional career for late hits and other infractions, including a $17,000 penalty for spitting in the face of Tampa Bay running back Michael Pittman during a January playoff game. He was also fined $25,000 for skipping a mandatory rookie symposium.
 

SkinsandTerps

Commanders Forever
Messages
7,627
Reaction score
125
Hostile said:
That is very true all the way around.

It's fine to be happy he's avoiding jail and you're keeping your player. I think proclaiming him innocent, as some of your chorts are trying to do, is a farce. He's not innocent. If he was innocent, there could be no possible repercussions for future missteps.

He is not innocent by any means, although he is not exactly guilty as charged in the eyes of the judicial system. He simply took a PBJ (probation before judgement) for all of the reasons that any reasonable lawyer would try to convince their client to take the deal.

Fines, community service, slate can be wiped clean, and or course no imprisonment.

Is he guilty of something ? Most likely.
Is he a threat to society ? Not likely.
Did he actually wave a gun at these guys ? Who really knows. Credibility issues at every turn.
Did he fight with one of them ? Seems that he did.

If he violates the terms of the PBJ, the case will go to court. If he is a good boy, it will be like the case never existed.

I am hoping for the good boy outcome. For his own sake. Not that I am saying that he hasn't been a dumb-*** at times, just that he is young, dumb, and needs to get his act together. Hopefully this whole scenario will wake him up and he will take his livelihood a little more seriously.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
skinsterp said:
The end result, after the probation period, will be the same as if the
case went to trial and Taylor was found not guilty on all counts.

that doesn't mean he was innocent
 

skinsterp

Member
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
summerisfunner said:
that doesn't mean he was innocent

Perhaps not. It doesn't mean he was guilty either. Taylor should have called the police. I think he made a serious error in judgement when he confronted those guys. Given that one is presumed innocent however, the prosecutor's proof wasn't terribly reliable based on the testimony of the guys Taylor confronted. I don't believe that Taylor would have lost a trial, but he chose not to take a chance on a jury's decision and be done with it all. I imagine he'll be fined, maybe even suspended. I just hope he gets his stuff together and learns from this. To me, his on-field spitting incident/s and general direspect of other players is more indicative of his need to grow up. I choose to believe that he'll learn from this past year and concentrate on playing, but I'm in a wait and see mode. He's got to prove to be a responsible person to me. A lot can happen in 18 months though.
 
Top