CowboysFever1973
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,528
- Reaction score
- 3,073
For context:
He went 1-0 a few seasons ago.
He went 4-1 a couple seasons ago.
He now has gone 2-2 in a season that Dak went 3-5. There’s no reason to keep paying Dak every season if Cooper Rush can win games. Why are we paying one player 60 million when the other is serviceable enough to win games when Dak is injured? I don’t get it!
He went 1-0 a few seasons ago.
He went 4-1 a couple seasons ago.
He now has gone 2-2 in a season that Dak went 3-5. There’s no reason to keep paying Dak every season if Cooper Rush can win games. Why are we paying one player 60 million when the other is serviceable enough to win games when Dak is injured? I don’t get it!