Not going to lie, he played like crap. Cobb should have been on the field though.
Look at Cooper's last eight games.Yeah, don't buy it. You don't have your #1 receiver on the bench with the game on the line regardless of how poor he is playing. Someone is getting thrown under the bus again to protect coaches. What is the explanation for no Cobb? It was a function of some twerp calling the wrong personnel package for that situation. Witten was in the game and he wasn't exactly lighting it up.
Look at Cooper's last eight games.
This is why Oakland gave up on him.
His body language was horrible.Give him a chance to turn it around. There is no way Witten and Bryant are better options on that play. Let him draw coverage his way at least. And what about Cobb?
Really? Look at Cooper's last eight games. Then look at ALL of his road games as a Cowboy.Not buying it, a poor playing Amari is 100X better than Austin and whoever else was in there. I'm betting Witten was in there even though he played like crap.
I'll be waiting for the excuse for why Cobb wasn't in there either.....
Just like last year, he complained about running that stupid curl pattern play after play...… Seems like every year there's a WR to scapegoat or throw under the bus, to make that idiot Garrett look good.His body language was horrible.
Just like it was against Chicago, Buffalo, half the season.
His body language was horrible.
Just like it was against Chicago, Buffalo, half the season.
Garrett has zero to do with the offense.Just like last year, he complained about running that stupid curl pattern play after play...… Seems like every year there's a WR to scapegoat or throw under the bus, to make that idiot Garrett look good.