CFZ Could a Guy Like Qadree Ollison Have Helped Against the 9ers?

Pass2Run

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,439
Reaction score
19,454
Going into the 9ers game, it was very obvious they were an excellent defense. Aside from being a dirty team overall, you have to admit the team was stacked with talent, and they had a very good defensive coordinator as well.

On the defensive side, we could have matched them, or outperformed them even. But to win the game, you have to put your offense in a position to beat the defense. One strategy, against this defense, at least, would have been to use a power back early and often as the proverbial battering-ram type of player/strategy.

And then, you could have unleashed your homerun hitter, Pollard, in the 2nd half and likely had more luck at offensive production, especially with a player with Tony Pollard's skillset.

I know bringing four backs to the game is a bit much, but if you didn't trust Davis, which it appears they did not, why not bring in a guy like Qadree Ollison as a surprise?

Just leave Davis on the inactive list. Or whatever you need to do. They obviously wouldn't have prepared for something like that. And at 233 pounds, the guy is simply a truck. And if nothing else, the defense would have been forced to exert the energy to bring him down, which soften things up for you in the 2nd half.

If you didn't do this, the only other logical option that makes sense would have been to give Malik the carries, since Zeke wasn't going to cut it.

 
Last edited:
No. Dumb *** Kellen Moore should of just used Davis. He has enough wiggle and burst.
 
No. Dumb *** Kellen Moore should of just used Davis. He has enough wiggle and burst.
That's probably McCarthy's call to make, though.

And you don't like Davis? I still like Aaron Shampklin, the UDFA they had in camp. But Ollison adds another dimension, especially against a team like San Fran.
 
This team is fixated on basic stuff. They go into a game with 1QB, 2 pass catchers and 2 RBs. No one else is prepared or utilized. Its like the coaching staff is as lazy as our GM and son
 
no

Dak was 100% the reason we lost and this is coming from a Dak supporter

man was throwing the ball to the 49ers like he was contractually obligated to
 
It's the OCs job to coordinate the offense. It's on Kellen.
The head coach is in charge of what personnel he works with, tough.

Kellen can only work with what they get him. You're clearly not looking at this objectively.
 
no

Dak was 100% the reason we lost and this is coming from a Dak supporter

man was throwing the ball to the 49ers like he was contractually obligated to
I agree with this, and I was also supportive of Dak this season, even after growing sour on him after last year's loss to the 9ers.

That said, having a viable running game might have helped.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,568
Messages
14,545,969
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top