DandyDon1722
It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
- Messages
- 6,374
- Reaction score
- 7,001
You mean a Divisional playoff run. We don’t engage in Super Bowl runs.
teams that stay healthy, have the best chance. I was reading an article a few days ago (can't remember where), that Eagles, Cinci and KC had the least amount of games lost for OL due to injuries. it says a lot about importance of continuity for the OL. that's why depth and good depth is critical.I love that Zak has ended his hold out. I think he is still a top 3 OG in the league. And Tyron is a monster, when he's healthy. But I'll be honest as I was thinking about our line in full, their ages, the experience and the injury history, it scared the heck out of me. I suddenly remembered the 2010 playoff loss to Minnesota. IMO we had a great team that year. Because they were so good, the age of the O-line was ignored and it caught up to them, seemingly all at once in that game. Could that happen again within the next couple of years?
We seem to be relying very heavily on a couple of older great players, with very little depth behind them. Either one or both could take a turn down hill at any moment. If Zac and Tyron were to both stumble to injury, age or whatever, what will the line look like? Could we survive a playoff run with Ball and Edoga starting? I don't think so.
No offense to Spoon, but I think they/we may very well end up regretting drafting a future TE with upside instead of drafting a starting caliber OG in rd2 of this draft.
This team needs to make a move, a FA pick up or a trade, to secure more quality O-line depth, before it costs them another Super Bowl run, again.
Super bowl run? Lmbao.I love that Zak has ended his hold out. I think he is still a top 3 OG in the league. And Tyron is a monster, when he's healthy. But I'll be honest as I was thinking about our line in full, their ages, the experience and the injury history, it scared the heck out of me. I suddenly remembered the 2010 playoff loss to Minnesota. IMO we had a great team that year. Because they were so good, the age of the O-line was ignored and it caught up to them, seemingly all at once in that game. Could that happen again within the next couple of years?
We seem to be relying very heavily on a couple of older great players, with very little depth behind them. Either one or both could take a turn down hill at any moment. If Zac and Tyron were to both stumble to injury, age or whatever, what will the line look like? Could we survive a playoff run with Ball and Edoga starting? I don't think so.
No offense to Spoon, but I think they/we may very well end up regretting drafting a future TE with upside instead of drafting a starting caliber OG in rd2 of this draft.
This team needs to make a move, a FA pick up or a trade, to secure more quality O-line depth, before it costs them another Super Bowl run, again.
Exactly how many yards did Dak throw for and how many touchdowns did Dak have in 2010? That big fat zero looms large over the team's failures.That's awesome. So it wasn't Tony Romo's fault. It was Dak Prescott - while he was in High School - that caused the Cowboys to fail.
With an aging O-line and no real depth to speak about with a less than mediocre, over hyped and over paid QB, it's going to be a long year!I love that Zak has ended his hold out. I think he is still a top 3 OG in the league. And Tyron is a monster, when he's healthy. But I'll be honest as I was thinking about our line in full, their ages, the experience and the injury history, it scared the heck out of me. I suddenly remembered the 2010 playoff loss to Minnesota. IMO we had a great team that year. Because they were so good, the age of the O-line was ignored and it caught up to them, seemingly all at once in that game. Could that happen again within the next couple of years?
We seem to be relying very heavily on a couple of older great players, with very little depth behind them. Either one or both could take a turn down hill at any moment. If Zac and Tyron were to both stumble to injury, age or whatever, what will the line look like? Could we survive a playoff run with Ball and Edoga starting? I don't think so.
No offense to Spoon, but I think they/we may very well end up regretting drafting a future TE with upside instead of drafting a starting caliber OG in rd2 of this draft.
This team needs to make a move, a FA pick up or a trade, to secure more quality O-line depth, before it costs them another Super Bowl run, again.
I mean, he drafted Zack Martin.
I didn't see Dak contributing anything to the team at all in 2010. Offensive line or not.Only in this place. you cant make this up
SMHI didn't see Dak contributing anything to the team at all in 2010. Offensive line or not.
The 90's line couldn't have even made his lack of contribution look good.
Depth is a concern.I love that Zak has ended his hold out. I think he is still a top 3 OG in the league. And Tyron is a monster, when he's healthy. But I'll be honest as I was thinking about our line in full, their ages, the experience and the injury history, it scared the heck out of me. I suddenly remembered the 2010 playoff loss to Minnesota. IMO we had a great team that year. Because they were so good, the age of the O-line was ignored and it caught up to them, seemingly all at once in that game. Could that happen again within the next couple of years?
We seem to be relying very heavily on a couple of older great players, with very little depth behind them. Either one or both could take a turn down hill at any moment. If Zac and Tyron were to both stumble to injury, age or whatever, what will the line look like? Could we survive a playoff run with Ball and Edoga starting? I don't think so.
No offense to Spoon, but I think they/we may very well end up regretting drafting a future TE with upside instead of drafting a starting caliber OG in rd2 of this draft.
This team needs to make a move, a FA pick up or a trade, to secure more quality O-line depth, before it costs them another Super Bowl run, again.
They didn't.right or wrong the boys claim their draft board did not have a guard worth that pick
Solari on draft day told the guys on the draft coverage that they are looking for "athletic" offensive linemen. Bottom line is they didn't like Torrence.I am still pissed Dallas did not take OG O'Cyrus Torrance in the 2nd round instead of the TE.
Let’s hope it was the right choice. I have my doubts but I’m used to double guessing the front office.Solari on draft day told the guys on the draft coverage that they are looking for "athletic" offensive linemen. Bottom line is they didn't like Torrence.
Typically the Cowboys pick OT's and move them to OG.
Would be nice if Asim Richards panned outSolari on draft day told the guys on the draft coverage that they are looking for "athletic" offensive linemen. Bottom line is they didn't like Torrence.
Typically the Cowboys pick OT's and move them to OG.
Offline is fine as wine.I love that Zak has ended his hold out. I think he is still a top 3 OG in the league. And Tyron is a monster, when he's healthy. But I'll be honest as I was thinking about our line in full, their ages, the experience and the injury history, it scared the heck out of me. I suddenly remembered the 2010 playoff loss to Minnesota. IMO we had a great team that year. Because they were so good, the age of the O-line was ignored and it caught up to them, seemingly all at once in that game. Could that happen again within the next couple of years?
We seem to be relying very heavily on a couple of older great players, with very little depth behind them. Either one or both could take a turn down hill at any moment. If Zac and Tyron were to both stumble to injury, age or whatever, what will the line look like? Could we survive a playoff run with Ball and Edoga starting? I don't think so.
No offense to Spoon, but I think they/we may very well end up regretting drafting a future TE with upside instead of drafting a starting caliber OG in rd2 of this draft.
This team needs to make a move, a FA pick up or a trade, to secure more quality O-line depth, before it costs them another Super Bowl run, again.
Well he has so far been athletically running over defenders so give me that over the aging guys.Solari on draft day told the guys on the draft coverage that they are looking for "athletic" offensive linemen. Bottom line is they didn't like Torrence.
Typically the Cowboys pick OT's and move them to OG.
If Travis goes down, Andy Reid would be screwed.The premise that Dallas is 2 OL injuries away from not being able to make a playoff run is true for every team.
What if Lane Johnson (33) and Travis Kelce (36) go down?
No team can accommodate those kinds of losses.
Tyler moves to LT if Tyron out.I love that Zak has ended his hold out. I think he is still a top 3 OG in the league. And Tyron is a monster, when he's healthy. But I'll be honest as I was thinking about our line in full, their ages, the experience and the injury history, it scared the heck out of me. I suddenly remembered the 2010 playoff loss to Minnesota. IMO we had a great team that year. Because they were so good, the age of the O-line was ignored and it caught up to them, seemingly all at once in that game. Could that happen again within the next couple of years?
We seem to be relying very heavily on a couple of older great players, with very little depth behind them. Either one or both could take a turn down hill at any moment. If Zac and Tyron were to both stumble to injury, age or whatever, what will the line look like? Could we survive a playoff run with Ball and Edoga starting? I don't think so.
No offense to Spoon, but I think they/we may very well end up regretting drafting a future TE with upside instead of drafting a starting caliber OG in rd2 of this draft.
This team needs to make a move, a FA pick up or a trade, to secure more quality O-line depth, before it costs them another Super Bowl run, again.