Could this team win without T.O.?

[JBell]

Our 3 possible opponents for the playoff game: NYG, WAS, TB

Against the Giants or Skins, I say no...

He was a huge part in our 3 wins over them this season.

4 TD's in the two Giants games, and 4 TD's in the one win vs. the Skins..

This offense just has no explosion without him.

and I'm not basin this off our last game either.. it's the truth.com

With T.O. being the competitor that he is, I think he'll definitely be back though...

He better be back, because if not, I don't see us scoring more than 20.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

I thought the game plan sucked yesterday. Yesterday, moreso than the regular season, it didn't make sense to use Julius. I think, we should of made MB3 the focus of our offense, especially in a rainy game. It's not good when Hurd is your #1 receiver -- not that I don't like the guy. I think we can win without TO, but it will be very hard.

 

[dthahn]

We can win but I don't think we can win the Superbowl without TO.

This just shows how much the offense misses a healthy Terry Glenn.

Jerry must get a legitimate #2 receiver for next season. Forget Larry Fitzgerald because the Cards won't let him go. I think Chad Johnson is more realistic because he's worn out his welcome in Cincinnati.

With Chad, it won't matter if TO goes down because Chad can step in and be a legit #1 receiver. He already is that for the Bengals.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

YOU CAN'T WIN WITHOUT T.O

Plain and simple. He draws coverage and is the ONLY explosive player on the field capable of taken to the ball to the house at any given moment.

Without him, this team is a 2nd round exit written all over it.

 

[Skinsmaniac]

I just don't see it. He opens up so much space for Witten and the RBs.

 

[Juke99]

Uh......no.

 

[Doomsday101]

I think we could win without TO in the lineup but I don't think we could get very far.

 

[windward]

Maybe, but our D better bring their A game.

 

[SuspectCorner]

Regular season? yes...

Playoffs? not only no - **** no!

 

[AdamJT13]

It would depend on Terry Glenn. And Romo (with or without Owens, he must play well for us to win).

 

[Maikeru-sama]

I don't think so.

Naturally, it is the Playoffs so the opposition will be alot better and the intensity will also increase.

Even when Terrell Owens wasn't catching the ball, opposing coordinators still accounted for him.

You do not want to roll into the Playoffs with a rusty Glenn, Hurd, Austin and Crayton.

It would depend on who we play, but again, what gave us our swagger on offense is that we had Terrell Owens and you didn't.

 

[ThreeSportStar80]

N O....

 

[Ren]

I thought the game plan sucked yesterday.

I doubt they even had one

 

[30yrheel]

are you kidding? he!! no.

 

[Nors]

We may win 1 game without TO,

Never 3 without TO

 

[Nors]

Skins Blueprinted how to beat us without TO.

Put 8 and 9 in box and blowup Run and contain Witten.

Make Hurd, Crayton, Austin, Stanbach beat you.

 

[burmafrd]

Glenn will be ready. He forces the D to respect him deep. With Witten and Crayton we can get it done against most teams. As long as the O line can get the job done both RUN blocking as well as pass blocking. I do not want to have to play the pack without TO. BUT that is another week off (if they make it) and much more likely TO will be ready. If the pack gets knocked off I think we can beat anyone else in the NFC without TO. And then it would be another 2 weeks for TO to get ready.

 

[JJB500]

We may win 1 game without TO,

Never 3 without TO

How far would the Patriots go with out Randy Moss?

 

[SuspectCorner]

How far would the Patriots go with out Randy Moss?

Prolly at least the AFC Championship Game... I wish Dallas was that battle-tested. Oh well, New England didn't get there overnight...

 

[windward]

Prolly at least the AFC Championship Game... I wish Dallas was that battle-tested. Oh well, New England didn't get there overnight...

In 2001, they did...