Could this team win without T.O.?

SuspectCorner

Still waiting...
Messages
10,242
Reaction score
2,861
windward;1870908 said:
In 2001, they did...

I get your point but NOW they have legit playoff experience and plenty of it... and that's a well Dallas can't go to.
 

SteveOS

Dedicated to Sports Gaming
Messages
1,884
Reaction score
1
No way no how the Boys win w/o T.O. It really shows how much this team depends on a gamebreaker receiver. The offense revolves around T.O.
 

gazmc_06

New Member
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
0
I don't think we'll win a game without T.O., we may not have needed to win the last two games but we haven't scored a TD since Owens went down and haven't even looked like doing so. T.O. is the best reciever we've had for a reason, he is an amazing player and the player that makes our offense work.

I think he'll be back though and that we will be fine, if he's not back then I think we're gone.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
JJB500;1870892 said:
How far would the Patriots go with out Randy Moss?:rolleyes:

They won 3 SB's without him and are far deeper at WR than we are. Would be a big loss but TO to us is far bigger.

Stallworth
Chad Jackson
Troy Brown

:)
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
windward;1870908 said:
In 2001, they did...

There was a lot of Vets on that team that had played on a SB in 1996. But yes that team came from out of nowhere in 2001.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Nors;1870948 said:
They won 3 SB's without him and are far deeper at WR than we are. Would be a big loss but TO to us is far bigger.

Stallworth
Chad Jackson
Troy Brown

:)

True, but this year things could be different as their defense is alot older.
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
4,961
this offense wouldnt get far without TO. i think we should try and get joey galloway back next year, to team up with TO and Glenn.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
CowboyChris;1871012 said:
this offense wouldnt get far without TO. i think we should try and get joey galloway back next year, to team up with TO and Glenn.

I disagree, but if you are going to do that, why not just keep Terry Glenn?
 

kingwhicker

BCRSA
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
0
No way, not one. In fact, we'd get run off the field. We might keep it close against TB, but ultimately we would lose. If he doesn't come back we are toast.
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
4,961
mickgreen58;1871014 said:
I disagree, but if you are going to do that, why not just keep Terry Glenn?

i didnt say anything about getting rid of Glenn, i said to team up with TO and Glenn.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
CowboyChris;1871051 said:
i didnt say anything about getting rid of Glenn, i said to team up with TO and Glenn.

So you want to feature a Wide Receiving core made up of a 36, 33 and 34 year old?
 

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,727
Reaction score
10,053
CowboyChris;1871012 said:
this offense wouldnt get far without TO. i think we should try and get joey galloway back next year, to team up with TO and Glenn.

*imagines Galloway giving us the birdie*
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,515
Reaction score
12,532
Round one of the playoffs?

With TO, Gurode, Newman, and Ratliff, we will beat any of those teams handily...good game plan, great focus and intensity, the better team wins easily.

Without TO, we can still beat any of those three teams with game planning, intensity and execution, but the games will be tighter.

Without TO, we'd lose round two when we face teams with good offenses to go with very good defenses.

If everyone's healthy, I still think we're the class of the NFC.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
If we draw Tampa in the divisional game, we'll trounce them with or without TO IMO

New York or Washington would be more interesting
 

Krystalina_

Member
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
HeavyHitta31;1871401 said:
If we draw Tampa in the divisional game, we'll trounce them with or without TO IMO

New York or Washington would be more interesting

I don't think it's possible for us to play Tampa...is it? :confused:
I don't think we could win against the Giants or Wash without TO.
 

Nexx

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,041
Reaction score
5,476
Gangsta Spanksta;1870601 said:
I thought the game plan sucked yesterday. Yesterday, moreso than the regular season, it didn't make sense to use Julius. I think, we should of made MB3 the focus of our offense, especially in a rainy game. It's not good when Hurd is your #1 receiver -- not that I don't like the guy. I think we can win without TO, but it will be very hard.

made total sense to me. why risk pounding marion when you can use julius in a meaningless game.
 

Natedawg44

Active Member
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
0
We really need to keep Cincinnati on the horn this offseason. Peter King mentioned that Parcells should offer his third rounder for Chad. I would trump that in a heartbeat. I would double that, two first day picks is a small price for a top 10 WR that is in his prime.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,232
Doomsday101;1870674 said:
I think we could win without TO in the lineup but I don't think we could get very far.

I think we could probably ink out a W against every NFC seed, except Packers.

With no TO, the Pack will run us off the field by half time:mad:
 
Top