SuspectCorner
Still waiting...
- Messages
- 10,242
- Reaction score
- 2,861
windward;1870908 said:In 2001, they did...
I get your point but NOW they have legit playoff experience and plenty of it... and that's a well Dallas can't go to.
windward;1870908 said:In 2001, they did...
Thanks to the tuck rule!windward;1870908 said:In 2001, they did...
JJB500;1870892 said:How far would the Patriots go with out Randy Moss?
windward;1870908 said:In 2001, they did...
Nors;1870948 said:They won 3 SB's without him and are far deeper at WR than we are. Would be a big loss but TO to us is far bigger.
Stallworth
Chad Jackson
Troy Brown
CowboyChris;1871012 said:this offense wouldnt get far without TO. i think we should try and get joey galloway back next year, to team up with TO and Glenn.
mickgreen58;1871014 said:I disagree, but if you are going to do that, why not just keep Terry Glenn?
CowboyChris;1871051 said:i didnt say anything about getting rid of Glenn, i said to team up with TO and Glenn.
Nors;1870880 said:Make Hurd, Crayton, Austin, Stanbach beat you.
CowboyChris;1871012 said:this offense wouldnt get far without TO. i think we should try and get joey galloway back next year, to team up with TO and Glenn.
HeavyHitta31;1871401 said:If we draw Tampa in the divisional game, we'll trounce them with or without TO IMO
New York or Washington would be more interesting
Gangsta Spanksta;1870601 said:I thought the game plan sucked yesterday. Yesterday, moreso than the regular season, it didn't make sense to use Julius. I think, we should of made MB3 the focus of our offense, especially in a rainy game. It's not good when Hurd is your #1 receiver -- not that I don't like the guy. I think we can win without TO, but it will be very hard.
Doomsday101;1870674 said:I think we could win without TO in the lineup but I don't think we could get very far.