Cowboys are not using the franchise tag

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,120
Reaction score
76,042
You must don't pay attention too well to free agency over the years, this is the time where players get OVERPAID by teams, teams that have boat loads of cap space
Players get overpaid but that doesn't mean Jerry should contribute to that.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,120
Reaction score
76,042
Stephen limits negotiations by being overly reliant on the Franchise Tag and draft picks (no negotiations required).

When they do have to deal with unrestricted free agent, they tend to lowball them.

They overpay their own free agents.

Stephen has proven to be dreadful at this.
I don't get this complaint. Is the issue re-signing his own players? Because you have to pay market value. Guys aren't taking pay cuts.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,086
Reaction score
22,596
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Stephen limits negotiations by being overly reliant on the Franchise Tag and draft picks (no negotiations required).

When they do have to deal with unrestricted free agent, they tend to lowball them.

They overpay their own free agents.

Stephen has proven to be dreadful at this.
Use of the franchise tag is not unlimited. They only use one franchise tag per year, and it's not as if the rest of the team is on rookie contracts. Multiple contracts are negotiated every year.

Whether they are good at it is a different topic. What we as fans think about how well they do doesn't change the fact that the Cowboys accept that negotiating contracts is an annual necessity, and they don't get mad about it.
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
18,308
Reaction score
25,580
Use of the franchise tag is not unlimited. They only use one franchise tag per year, and it's not as if the rest of the team is on rookie contracts. Multiple contracts are negotiated every year.
He has used the Franchise Tag on players that probably weren't "Franchise" players.

Anthony Spencer, Dalton Schultz, Tony Pollard.

You can keep coming up with excuses, but the reality is he has struggled in this aspect. The Dak contract is a disaster, he got embarrassed by Randy Gregory's agent, they overpad both Jaylon Smith and Ezekiel Elliott, and worse than that, they did it a year earlier than they had to. He's awful.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,779
Reaction score
37,171
He has used the Franchise Tag on players that probably weren't "Franchise" players.

Anthony Spencer, Dalton Schultz, Tony Pollard.

You can keep coming up with excuses, but the reality is he has struggled in this aspect. The Dak contract is a disaster, he got embarrassed by Randy Gregory's agent, they overpad both Jaylon Smith and Ezekiel Elliott, and worse than that, they did it a year earlier than they had to. He's awful.
Imagine giving Dak a no trade-clause coming off a broken leg…
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
31,130
Reaction score
72,063
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Not new news. It might finally be official today.

There really isn't anyone to tag.
The NFL needs a reverse Franchise tag .. they could call it the ... Disenfranchise Tag! :D

By using the "Disenfranchise Tag" it would allow any team to release a player and wipe their salary off the books for a one time cap hit based on the average salary of the top 5 paid players in the position over the last 5 years (the same as the franchise tag).

That way there would be a one-time cap hit, no future dead money and the player gets to leave and continue his career and the team gets to save some money and move on.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
100,902
Reaction score
109,291
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The NFL needs a reverse Franchise tag .. they could call it the ... Disenfranchise Tag! :D

By using the "Disenfranchise Tag" it would allow any team to release a player and wipe their salary off the books for a one time fee based on the average salary of the top 5 paid players in the position over the last 5 years (the same as the franchise tag).

That way there would be a one-time cap hit, no future dead money and the player gets to leave and continue his career and the team gets to save some money and move on.
Interesting idea! Opens up some possibilities.

But (you knew it was coming) I was told there would be no math.
 

ksadler1

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,976
Reaction score
5,342
I honestly don't care who stays or goes anymore when the end result is always the same. With this team, there's really no reason to use the tag when it's going on 30 years with no success and the so-called owners have no clue how to put a championship team on the field. There's too many "me" guys on this team and not enough "hungry blue collar" guys.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,086
Reaction score
22,596
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
He has used the Franchise Tag on players that probably weren't "Franchise" players.

Anthony Spencer, Dalton Schultz, Tony Pollard.

You can keep coming up with excuses, but the reality is he has struggled in this aspect. The Dak contract is a disaster, he got embarrassed by Randy Gregory's agent, they overpad both Jaylon Smith and Ezekiel Elliott, and worse than that, they did it a year earlier than they had to. He's awful.
There is no definition of the kind of player a franchise tag has to be used on. In some cases, like with Schultz, it's just ensuring the position is well covered one more year without making a long term commitment, and in doing so they get to see how younger players develop.

But that's irrelevant to the discussion anyway. One franchise tag doesn't mean they get to avoid negotiating contracts, or they get mad if they have to negotiate a contract. Again, they negotiate contracts every year, as do all NFL teams.
 

DuncanIso

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,355
Reaction score
7,232
Top