Does Romo wear any of the rings in your photo?
So it looks like by the number of posts you have no clue on how many times we have gone over that in here and most everybody gets it but every once in a while a new poster writes it and we have to catch everybody up so here's the Readers Digest version--
NOBODY - was going to win a ring in Dallas with the talent surrounding Romo in his career. The only team that had a chance couldn't put the Giants away because of two dropped TD passes. Romo ran for his life against the Vikings and had no shot in that one either.
Those 8-8 years were really 4-12 without Romo and just go back and look at the offensive lines and defense on those teams. It's a testament to Tony we were even relevant.
This isn't opinion, it's a fact and it has the entire history of the NFL to back it up. The most important stat to winning in the NFL is Def Paas Rating. Look up last years leaders (Seattle, GB, Den, Car) and worst (Tenn, Cle, NO, Mia, NY). In his career Romo has never had a top ten DPR team. In fact, we really had no chance in 2014 where that team was 24th. Who didn't know that Rodgers was going to score on us whether Dez caught it or not.
Then we get into the whole ring thing. That means that Mark Rypien, Eli Manning and Trent Dilfer were all better than Marino, Fouts, Tarkenton, Kelly, etc. It's the worst argument a fan can make who isn't knowledgeable. It's the ultimate team game and if the rest of the team did their job as well as Romo has in his career we would've won multiple Super Bowls.
BTW - where are we in DPR this season? 21st which means if we happen to win the SB with that same rating we would be the first team ever to do it, that's why all talk about a Super Bowl should include this. I hope we break that trend, whether it's with Dak or Romo but it's a huge mountain to climb.
So now you know about the whole ring comment, why it's weak and why you are smarter today than yesterday.