kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 49,078
- Reaction score
- 51,858
There are those of us who tried to tell you this early in the season.56 yards of rushing for the Pack last night.
There are those of us who tried to tell you this early in the season.56 yards of rushing for the Pack last night.
Since we're doing comps..
Dak 59%, 265 yards, 3 td, 2 int, 78.6 qbr
Tannehill 81% 333 yds, 2 td, 1 int 126 qbr
Fun.
That just...................fits.Titans are a physical team. We are a talkative team.
But can we address the D? But since you bring up Tannehill.....kudos for highs in Tannehill's game.....and as we want Dak to be all/do all.....bet Tannehill reverts back to his norm soon. Fun.Since we're doing comps..
Dak 59%, 265 yards, 3 td, 2 int, 78.6 qbr
Tannehill 81% 333 yds, 2 td, 1 int 126 qbr
Fun.
It's so weird watching so many trying desperately to blame one or the other when they both stunk in the 4th.Yep, offense and defense both went home for the 4th qtr.
true dallas has sub par coaching and that is on jones, but also dan has done a good jobThe last 2 weeks the defence got shredded. Last week they got destroyed coming off a bye.
Here is the difference between Kansas City…KC has great coaching. I’m pretty sure Andy Reid would game plan for Mahommes absence? Did Quinn game plan for Parsons playing off the line? Sure did not look it?
And to me that’s the biggest problem with this team. Take Parsons away from D and our coaches have no ability to scheme around that…
Those numbers make it appear as if Tannehilly played more efficiently than Dak. Why you gotta be such a meanie????Since we're doing comps..
Dak 59%, 265 yards, 3 td, 2 int, 78.6 qbr
Tannehill 81% 333 yds, 2 td, 1 int 126 qbr
Fun.
It means nothing. Let me try to explain it. They run on us because they know we’re going after the quarterback first. We figure eventually they’re going to get tired of running and go back to the pass and will destroy them. Just like Green Bay did late in the fourth quarter he gave up on the run and almost lost the game that’s why Aaron Rodgers was so upset. We’re not a fraud we just need to change the scheme56 yards of rushing for the Pack last night.
Since we're doing comps..
Dak 59%, 265 yards, 3 td, 2 int, 78.6 qbr
Tannehill 81% 333 yds, 2 td, 1 int 126 qbr
Fun.
56 yards of rushing for the Pack last night.
That's fair but we were up 14 in the 4th....
Or rather, our lack of talent at DT has been exposed in a major way. The willynilly pass rush was merely hiding the warts.It means nothing. Let me try to explain it. They run on us because they know we’re going after the quarterback first. We figure eventually they’re going to get tired of running and go back to the pass and will destroy them. Just like Green Bay did late in the fourth quarter he gave up on the run and almost lost the game that’s why Aaron Rodgers was so upset. We’re not a fraud we just need to change the scheme
Or that lol I’ve only been saying it for 16 seasonsOr rather, our lack of talent at DT has been exposed in a major way. The willynilly pass rush was merely hiding the warts.
Dak is a big play QB. Problem w/ that is that those big plays gas the D, and is too easy to shut down at times. Someone needs to teach him how to play QB. He's got the big plays down, he needs to learn how to dink and dunk, which is needed at times. It's not just about scoring more points, that's FF stuff. There's a ton more to it than that.I would say that at this point the Cowboys D is definitely not what it looked like it was in the beginning of the year. They got too amped up on pass rushing. Oddly, I would have thought that the D would have had a easier time with Dak at QB. Cowboys scoring more points, which would allow them to Tee off on the QB more.
It was like we were still using wagons compared to what the Japanese were doing.
That just...................fits.
Didn't both teams play Sunday? I think Tannehill is an average bus driver of a qb.Its never apples to apples. The Packers D barely showed up last night. 2 games in 5 days. Tannehil had all day to throw the ball. He was sitting back there just hanging out, making throws. Wasnt that way in our game.
I like Tannehil, but he doesnt have games like that often.
Dak is a big play QB. Problem w/ that is that those big plays gas the D, and is too easy to shut down at times. Someone needs to teach him how to play QB. He's got the big plays down, he needs to learn how to dink and dunk, which is needed at times. It's not just about scoring more points, that's FF stuff. There's a ton more to it than that.
I've addressed the defense numerous times. The whole team collapsed in the 4th quarter...offense and defense both played for about half a game. Usually isn't going to get it done.But can we address the D? But since you bring up Tannehill.....kudos for highs in Tannehill's game.....and as we want Dak to be all/do all.....bet Tannehill reverts back to his norm soon. Fun.
Yes. This is very important to me. Please love me!LOL, Nate you are trying your hardest to become a Horsemen. They love you!