- How was Marty B. gonna really be able to develop as a receiver with Witten never coming off the field and always being the focus of the offense?
His biggest contribution as a 2nd TE was primarily an in-line blocker (which he was actually better than Witten in that area) and being so little used
and underdeveloped was the reason for his departure.
Plus all the pipe dream for having a mimic of a Pats 2 TE offense went out of the window. Which had to be the reason why we chose a 2nd TE as high
as the 2nd round. It never came close to developing under that coaching staff. Ironically we repeated same 2nd TE mistake with the drafting
of Gavin Escobar.
- If durability wasn't a concern issue, i would love the idea of Sean Lee flexing at all LB positions in a pinch .
Much like he
very surprisingly did when LVE was shelved injured and IR'ed. But how much do you gamble on a 33 yr old LB with a durability concern?
Ability wise i have no problem with Thomas, who has experience, speed to offer, but he's also been often hurt since he's been here.
Otherwise we're likely to see some of what we saw last year when we were bringing unheralded LBs right off the street. (ala Malcom Smith)
- Supposedly both Hill and Gallimore have played across the line as 3 tech and 1 tech in their respective college careers.
Size wise they may not be ideal for the 1 tech in a pinch.but that's why they will have to become essential as immediate emergency plug ins
if (when?) Antuwann Woods goes thru his usual injury streak.which is why we will need someone else capable in the rotation once a rash of injuries hit.