baltcowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,045
- Reaction score
- 19,728
Allen is done. Why would Detroit trade Jameson?Maybe. Will he quit? Will he give his all? I rather have Allen or trade for Jameson.
Allen is done. Why would Detroit trade Jameson?Maybe. Will he quit? Will he give his all? I rather have Allen or trade for Jameson.
Shefty and others brought up his name . Teams were calling about himAllen is done. Why would Detroit trade Jameson?
Ain't it funny how that works?Get the running game going and our current number two and three WR’s will all of a sudden look better.
Will it tells you all you need to know about the Lions if they got rid of that kid for a draft pick.Shefty and others brought up his name . Teams were calling about him
why would the 49ers give him up? They just reloaded their whole Line of Scrimmage this draft and Warner will still be the main guy in the middle.How about trading for Fred Warner? I'm sick of hearing how this team needs a WR.
They need a freaking MLB!!!!!!!
True. And Jerry isn't a high character guy himself.I could be mistaken but wasn't it Shotty that said they were looking for high character guys?
Because he's the same guy that says they will build from the outside in and they took an interior lineman with their highest pick
Beat me to it. Can’t be preaching about “character” guys then to trading for that type of player.I thought they were looking for high character guys? That's not Pickens.
I don't disagree with that, but I think they are more likely to let his contract play out and draft his replacement next year. Unless they consider themselves to be in rebuilding mode, I don't see why they would weaken themselves and trade away their No. 2.They just signed Metcalf to a $132M contract. I’m dubious they want to extend another high-priced reciever (Pickens) that happens to be a nut job.
He is right thoughThought so
Thx for exposing who you are, again
Mingo is raw and has 2 years left on his contract, Pickens is a headcase and needs a new deal after 1 more year.People that are saying no to Pickens, would you rather Mingo or Tolbert as your #2? If it’s either Pickens or those two for the second spot than give me Pickens.
Pickens is productive. My problem with him isnt production or even being a diva. I could care less. I dont need a team full of guys that tuck their shirts in. My problem with Pickens is he a very long history of doing incredibly stupid things on the field. He is a guy you have to worry about blowing a big game by getting a crucial, and completely pointless penaltywhy would the 49ers give him up? They just reloaded their whole Line of Scrimmage this draft and Warner will still be the main guy in the middle.
And no to Pickens . Absolute headcase. Dez Bryant was one but atleast he backed it up in production.
It’s also the reason I have a hard time believing the Cowboys would want to trade for Pickens given the fact they’d probably have to extend him immediately to make it worth their while. For a team that likes to act like we’re paupers, I’m skeptical it’s what they have in mind.I don't disagree with that, but I think they are more likely to let his contract play out and draft his replacement next year. Unless they consider themselves to be in rebuilding mode, I don't see why they would weaken themselves and trade away their No. 2.
The trade was more for the future, not for last year to help Rush. As the season was a lost cause at that point anyway.if we trade for a WR than giving up a 4th for Mingo last season will be even more dumber especially when Dak was already injured when the trade happened.