Cowboys have the 13th best odds of making the playoffs in the NFC

Out of the teams listed, I don't think anyone is a lock on the NFC side other then Eagles and Lions. Everyone else is a crapshoot:

Rams? They have an aging QB one hit away from a done season, and the D isnt the greatest.
49ers? Have lost how many starters? And replaced them with what exactly?
Buccaneers? Mayfield effect? Aging WRs? Aging D?
Commanders? Are they for real or are they a repeat of the Texans from last season?
Packers? What exactly have they proven? Wasnt last year supposed to be the season?
Vikings? No Darnold, can McCarthy do what Darnold did?
Cardinals? What exactly has Murray done since being drafted?
Falcons? Based on what?
Bears? Same as above?
Seahawks? Replace Metcalf with aging Kupp? Replace Smith with Darnold? No lockett?

So the Cowboys have improved slightly in free agency, will definitely get 2 starters from draft that will make them better. Getting a healthy Prescott back. But we are beneath all of them? Why exactly?
 
Playoff odds in April mean less than nothing. Where were the Commanders listed last year? Or the Lions the year before that? Or the Bengals in 2021?
 
Ranching said:
Homers are loyal to a fault, but not stupid. We know we aren't very good, we just aren't happy about and run around hooping and hollering, we suck, Dak sucks, Jerry sucks, Micah sucks, I hope we lose by 50......that's stupidity at its best. Claim to be a fan, yet being happy at failure. Lol!
Click to expand...
This place acts like a death cult.
 
DRella said:
Out of the teams listed, I don't think anyone is a lock on the NFC side other then Eagles and Lions. Everyone else is a crapshoot:

Rams? They have an aging QB one hit away from a done season, and the D isnt the greatest.
49ers? Have lost how many starters? And replaced them with what exactly?
Buccaneers? Mayfield effect? Aging WRs? Aging D?
Commanders? Are they for real or are they a repeat of the Texans from last season?
Packers? What exactly have they proven? Wasnt last year supposed to be the season?
Vikings? No Darnold, can McCarthy do what Darnold did?
Cardinals? What exactly has Murray done since being drafted?
Falcons? Based on what?
Bears? Same as above?
Seahawks? Replace Metcalf with aging Kupp? Replace Smith with Darnold? No lockett?

So the Cowboys have improved slightly in free agency, will definitely get 2 starters from draft that will make them better. Getting a healthy Prescott back. But we are beneath all of them? Why exactly?
Click to expand...
Perhaps because every team in the NFC “will definitely get 2 starters from draft that will make them better”. And every team in the NFC can still improve “slightly in free agency” post draft. It is entirely possible, based on the Cowboys’ front office’s performance in recent years that Dallas will be the least improved NFC team 2025 vs. 2024. The team stinks. They are poorly managed. Most fans have stopped deluding themselves.
 
DRella said:
Out of the teams listed, I don't think anyone is a lock on the NFC side other then Eagles and Lions. Everyone else is a crapshoot:

Rams? They have an aging QB one hit away from a done season, and the D isnt the greatest.
49ers? Have lost how many starters? And replaced them with what exactly?
Buccaneers? Mayfield effect? Aging WRs? Aging D?
Commanders? Are they for real or are they a repeat of the Texans from last season?
Packers? What exactly have they proven? Wasnt last year supposed to be the season?
Vikings? No Darnold, can McCarthy do what Darnold did?
Cardinals? What exactly has Murray done since being drafted?
Falcons? Based on what?
Bears? Same as above?
Seahawks? Replace Metcalf with aging Kupp? Replace Smith with Darnold? No lockett?

So the Cowboys have improved slightly in free agency, will definitely get 2 starters from draft that will make them better. Getting a healthy Prescott back. But we are beneath all of them? Why exactly?
Click to expand...
How exactly do you figure the Cowboys have "improved slightly" during FA. They have lost more quality starters than they have brought on, sure they have a few wild card former first rounders, but the lost players to FA and retirement far outweigh the guys they signed.
 
DRella said:
Out of the teams listed, I don't think anyone is a lock on the NFC side other then Eagles and Lions. Everyone else is a crapshoot:

Rams? They have an aging QB one hit away from a done season, and the D isnt the greatest.
49ers? Have lost how many starters? And replaced them with what exactly?
Buccaneers? Mayfield effect? Aging WRs? Aging D?
Commanders? Are they for real or are they a repeat of the Texans from last season?
Packers? What exactly have they proven? Wasnt last year supposed to be the season?
Vikings? No Darnold, can McCarthy do what Darnold did?
Cardinals? What exactly has Murray done since being drafted?
Falcons? Based on what?
Bears? Same as above?
Seahawks? Replace Metcalf with aging Kupp? Replace Smith with Darnold? No lockett?

So the Cowboys have improved slightly in free agency, will definitely get 2 starters from draft that will make them better. Getting a healthy Prescott back. But we are beneath all of them? Why exactly?
Click to expand...
Are you really going to pretend a healthy Dak was good? Even IF you think we improved in FA, we were a long way away from approaching a Super Bowl. So "slightly" probably describes our chance at the playoffs.
 
DRella said:
Out of the teams listed, I don't think anyone is a lock on the NFC side other then Eagles and Lions. Everyone else is a crapshoot:

Rams? They have an aging QB one hit away from a done season, and the D isnt the greatest.
49ers? Have lost how many starters? And replaced them with what exactly?
Buccaneers? Mayfield effect? Aging WRs? Aging D?
Commanders? Are they for real or are they a repeat of the Texans from last season?
Packers? What exactly have they proven? Wasnt last year supposed to be the season?
Vikings? No Darnold, can McCarthy do what Darnold did?
Cardinals? What exactly has Murray done since being drafted?
Falcons? Based on what?
Bears? Same as above?
Seahawks? Replace Metcalf with aging Kupp? Replace Smith with Darnold? No lockett?

So the Cowboys have improved slightly in free agency, will definitely get 2 starters from draft that will make them better. Getting a healthy Prescott back. But we are beneath all of them? Why exactly?
Click to expand...
Your kind and reasoned responce is soon squashed by the fact that any of the teams you tried to diminish can put a big hurt on the Cowboys. So, no matter who we seek to minimize, we still suck.

That, Skeletor lad, is me main concern.

We live in an NFL world in which the Lions and Eagles are lords and the lesser teams can push us around.
 
According to one betting site, not only are the Cowboys are not expected to make the playoffs, but they are also projected to be one of the worst teams in the entire NFC this season. The site gave Dallas just a 33% chance of making the playoffs, good for the 13th-worst odds in the conference. Only the Carolina Panthers, New Orleans Saints, and New York Giants have a lower chance at making the postseason, according to these bookmakers.
 
I can not be the only one who realizes this lol…

The odds for Dallas are too low. Why? Because Dallas doesn’t need to be better than all those other teams in the NFC…they only need to be better than both the Commanders and the Giants. Why??…because no team has won the NFC East two years in a row in over 20 years. So there’s a very good chance the Eagles will continue this trend and not win the division this season. So whoever has the best record between Washington, Dallas and New York will win the division, and thus make the playoffs…regardless of what all the other teams on the NFC do.

Follow me for more betting advice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 89 more.
Total: 3,255 (members: 189, guests: 3,066)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,914
Messages
13,838,515
Members
23,782
Latest member
Cowboyfan4ver
Back
Top