I would have hired her too once I looked at her pic.
Good hire !
Interesting stuff. I would advise her to do a cluster analysis of her vocabulary. She will find overuse of the word "um". She should try to eliminated that from her speaking.
I suppose it is only a matter of time before analytics evolves to the point of predictive reasoning. It is scary to think we may someday see computers predicting our every reaction with near certainty. But then analytics are also predictable so teams will see patterns in their and their opponents behaviors and compensate for that.
I have always wondered if someone would attempt to gather as lots of data about college players and NFL players and use it to predict with more accuracy who in the draft will succeed in NFL. I would not expect this to be perfect, but I suspect it could evolve to be better than Jerry and Stephen.
Hey…umm … she speaks Jerry language … they understand each other ….If Sarah could get over her case of the ums, she could be interesting to listen to.
It looks like your 1999 prediction about the feminization of the NFL turned out to be correct.
I like her though. You just need someone to understand what they're doing, and she's pleasant enough.
Apparently at least one more than before.football isnt this complicated. How many analysts do we need?
She's an expert in machine learning and AI. Like I was saying before, Jerry has the means to do this, and they should be doing it. She should be working hand-in-hand with coaches, and the scouting department, to analyze and highlight data that can give you an edge, or develop strategy. This is good.
She sounds bright.
Were they the ones who told him that the data shows if you deflate the footballs some you can throw them better?The Patriots used to combine this sort of analysis with behavioral experts, body language experts and lip readers. That was half of Tom Brady's game. He was in tight with the analytics department.
Yup I think Allen Iverson would make a great GM. Practice we talking practice...If she can replace Jerry with AI, I'm all for it.
I'll take the under for $100.I'll set the over/under at 1 minute for the amount of time the GM and his Director of Player Personnel invest in trying to understand this type of analysis.
And our play calling the last ten years…I wish AI were our GM.
They told them not to worry about the NYGiants that they'd win by at least 3 TD's and become the 1st 19-0 team in history.Were they the ones who told him that the data shows if you deflate the footballs some you can throw them better?
I'd give $500 to charity to be present at the first meeting where she tries to dumb this down for her audience just to see their blank expressions.I'll set the over/under at 1 minute for the amount of time the GM and his Director of Player Personnel invest in trying to understand this type of analysis.