News: Cowboys Misconceptions

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
Cowboys Misconceptions

http://cowboyszone.com/2016/07/cowboys-misconceptions.html



The Cowboys have long since stuck the narrative they are content with their current roster heading into Training Camp. The plan has always been to wait until then to properly evaluate the players currently on the roster. Two popular misconceptions regarding the Dallas Cowboys 2016 off-season that I seem to be hearing ad nauseam:

  1. The team didn’t address the backup QB position.
  2. The team didn’t address the pass rush.
Now hear me out!! I’m not saying that the Cowboys have fixed either of these areas of concern yet. Simply saying the season is still 44 days away, Training Camp is just now beginning and there’s still time to make adjustments before the 53-man roster is finalized. The Cowboys may have missed out on adding some of this year’s premier free agents at both areas of concern, but realistically the team wasn’t getting into a bidding war and it was never going to happen anyway. The FO hasn’t shied away from their intentions of wanting to see what is currently on the roster before making any sudden moves in free agency.

Choosing to give your young players every opportunity to succeed isn’t the same thing as neglecting the position altogether. If the Cowboys don’t think a particular player is picking things up quickly enough, or the team happens to need said players roster spot, they won’t hesitate to make a transaction. Ideally, the FO would prefer to fill the holes with players that are currently on the roster though and can you blame them? The team invested their precious draft picks on some talented prospects that they believe can help contribute immediately. Not to mention, the Cowboys have typically been good at finding UDFA’s. The Cowboys will be looking for their rookies, along with the recently added veterans, to step up and prove that they’re worth the team’s initial investment. Wearing the Star is a privilege and it must be earned by each of them.

However, what the team wants and what they get are two very different things. Waiting to see the players practice with pads on and full contact before making rash decisions is just smart business. It’ll certainly help the FO better evaluate their players, but it won’t prevent the team from needing to make additional transactions. In fact, the team recently brought LB Justin Durant back on a one-year deal. With the recent news of a second suspension looming for DE Randy Gregory, the team could be looking to add some more help soon. Don’t be surprised if after a couple of Training Camp practices, or possibly even pre-season games, the Dallas Cowboys end up adding and subtracting a few more players before eventually solidifying their final 53-man roster. Especially closer to the deadline, once the other teams officially start releasing players...

...Backup Quarterback: Josh McCown, Mike Glennon and Derek Anderson are all decent backup QB’s that the Cowboys could potentially trade for if they feel compelled to add another QB into the mix. Anderson would be the hardest of the three to pry away, because Carolina would then be forced to rely on Joe Webb if something were to happen to Cam Newton, but for the right compensation I believe a deal could be made. Of course, the Cowboys could also choose to roll with what they’ve got. Even though Kellen Moore probably isn’t most of cowboyszone’s first choice for the backup QB role, he is still an improvement over the likes of either Matt Cassel or Brandon Weeden.

What I’d like to see happen: After signing Robert Griffin III (RG3) and drafting rookie Cody Kessler, to go along with both Josh McCown and Austin Davis, I’m hoping that McCown gets lost in the shuffle and released outright. Even if the Cowboys had to trade for him though, it’d be worth it to provide Moore with some competition in Training Camp. However, it’s more likely we’ll see the team offer a non-guaranteed contract to Nick Foles for the same purpose mentioned above.

Pass Rush: Even though the Atlanta Falcons seem to be the top choice for Dwight Freeney’s landing spot, I believe the Cowboys should make an attempt to bring the savvy veteran on board. He recorded eight sacks in 11 games with the Arizona Cardinals last year and the Cowboys would certainly benefit from having a pass rusher with his talents. The team wouldn’t need him to be an every down starter, but it’d be nice to turn him loose on the opposing quarterbacks and pile up some sacks.

What I’d like to see happen: Freeney sign with the Cowboys… even if only on a one-year deal. Despite reports that the Cowboys have shown no interest in Freeney, I find it hard to believe that the team isn’t licking their chops at the chance to bring him on board. I don’t think he cares to go through the rigors of Training Camp so don’t be surprised if his decision doesn’t come for a couple of weeks. Here’s to hoping he lands in Dallas!!
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,309
Reaction score
102,233
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I just skimmed through the article for now.
The one thing I do see, is that they do have 44 days to the 1st game. However, they better have this worked out before those 44 days are up. So it's more like 30 to 35 days all issues need to be addressed. Unless some trades happen a week before the start of the season.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The writer is just trying to cover for Jerry's horrible decision making.

This offseason has been a disaster ....... and its directly because of Jerry's choices as a GM

It's 'fan talk', not journalism, that's for sure. Someone trying to talk both themselves and everyone else off the ledge by saying "See? It's not that bad. Right guys? Right? Right?"

I'm seeing it everywhere right now.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
It's 'fan talk', not journalism, that's for sure. Someone trying to talk both themselves and everyone else off the ledge by saying "See? It's not that bad. Right guys? Right? Right?"

I'm seeing it everywhere right now.

That might be a tad drama filled as well...
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
So let me get this straight. The backup QB we had....Weeden....who had the benefit of a couple of mini camps....a couple of training camps....and a couple of preseasons...who was the most improved player on the team last offseason....and who threw the prettiest ball Jerry Jones ever did see....could not get first downs...could not score points..could not win games. But we expect to bring somebody in....without all the aforementioned advantages...and said person will be able to get first downs, score points and win games if Romo goes down?

Again....the problem in Dallas is BIGGER than the personnel....Matt Cassell won games in New England....made the Pro Bowl in KC. Weeden went to the Texans and won a game. Why is so hard for media/fans etc...to grasp that this is BIGGER than the actual player?
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
So let me get this straight. The backup QB we had....Weeden....who had the benefit of a couple of mini camps....a couple of training camps....and a couple of preseasons...who was the most improved player on the team last offseason....and who threw the prettiest ball Jerry Jones ever did see....could not get first downs...could not score points..could not win games. But we expect to bring somebody in....without all the aforementioned advantages...and said person will be able to get first downs, score points and win games if Romo goes down?

Again....the problem in Dallas is BIGGER than the personnel....Matt Cassell won games in New England....made the Pro Bowl in KC. Weeden went to the Texans and won a game. Why is so hard for media/fans etc...to grasp that this is BIGGER than the actual player?

The answer to that could well be the role that is given to a backup when he steps up due to injury. That, and how difficult in last season, it was to overcome the loss of the top receiver on the roster.
 

Zimmy Lives

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,165
Reaction score
4,631
So he says there are two misconceptions........... and then admits neither problem has been fixed yet.

LOL.

Right! LOL!

Misconceptions that are facts: the backup QB position is a huge question mark and the DE position is not solved. It should be a fun camp!
 

cowboyblue22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
8,707
the questions will begin to be answered when the play the new York giants in sept if not before this team has to stay REALLY because the roster is paper thin
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,205
It's 'fan talk', not journalism, that's for sure. Someone trying to talk both themselves and everyone else off the ledge by saying "See? It's not that bad. Right guys? Right? Right?"

I'm seeing it everywhere right now.


This team should be competing for a Superbowl and we pretty much wasted an offseason by not trying to improve the defense a little better through free agency and with that premium 2nd round pick.

Even the Zeke pick.. We all love the Zeke pick but I still feel like it was a luxury that we couldn't afford with how awful our defensive talent was and how easy it is to find a runner. He has to be a superstar to validate that pick.
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
The answer to that could well be the role that is given to a backup when he steps up due to injury. That, and how difficult in last season, it was to overcome the loss of the top receiver on the roster.

So you are suggesting our coaching staff gave the most improved player on the team last year a "losing" role?

You are suggesting our coaching staff would give a new player who just joined the team and received his playbook a better gameplan than they gave Weeden?

Steven McGee had been here like 3 or 4 years...and anytime I watched him play...he looked like he picked up a football for the first time on gameday.

Romo has made a lot of people rich in Dallas. And way too many people are content to sick back and count their money...instead of really peeling back the onion and getting to the root of the problem. And I would have thought last year...with the bottom falling out...the organization would have gotten a dose of reality to who we really are. But that cannot happen when the people with the most influence don't understand what they are watching and never suffer any repercussions for being dreadful.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
So you are suggesting our coaching staff gave the most improved player on the team last year a "losing" role?

You are suggesting our coaching staff would give a new player who just joined the team and received his playbook a better gameplan than they gave Weeden?

Steven McGee had been here like 3 or 4 years...and anytime I watched him play...he looked like he picked up a football for the first time on gameday.

Romo has made a lot of people rich in Dallas. And way too many people are content to sick back and count their money...instead of really peeling back the onion and getting to the root of the problem. And I would have thought last year...with the bottom falling out...the organization would have gotten a dose of reality to who we really are. But that cannot happen when the people with the most influence don't understand what they are watching and never suffer any repercussions for being dreadful.



Don't give up your day job...but I'll state my own words. Stick to your own view, but DON'T attempt to glue them upon another. Good night...
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That might be a tad drama filled as well...

Could be, I have been known from time to time...

;)

But in all seriousness, whether I agree with the take or respect the writer or not, I do sincerely appreciate the time you take to share these articles with the rest of the forum.

:thumbup:
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This team should be competing for a Superbowl and we pretty much wasted an offseason by not trying to improve the defense a little better through free agency and with that premium 2nd round pick.

Even the Zeke pick.. We all love the Zeke pick but I still feel like it was a luxury that we couldn't afford with how awful our defensive talent was and how easy it is to find a runner. He has to be a superstar to validate that pick.

I read an interesting Peter King piece on the Giants signing of Olivier Vernon.

http://mmqb.si.com/2016/03/10/olivier-vernon-new-york-giants-nfl-free-agency-blockbuster-contract

It mentions the Cowboys being one of the team's interested in him at the start of free agency. If that's the case, why did they then turn around and do next no nothing after not signing him?

If you're talking to his agent at all, you're:

a) Admitting that you need serious help at the defensive end position

And

b) Willing to spend considerable dollars to do it, because everyone knew he wouldn't be cheap, especially having already been tagged at $12 million for one year.

So, if that was the case, why has this team done little to nothing since then?

Why do they little to no interest in a Hall of Fame pass rusher he had more sacks in less games than Vernon himself did last year?

Their motivations and decisions continue to leave me scratching my head far too often.

:huh:
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
You act is stale. Get some new material.

Wise up and quit being a preppie...your listening skills are zero.

Romo has made a lot of guys rich? No, he has produced as a quality quarterback.

Content with salaries? No, the roster churns 1/3 each season...at least until the stronger nucleus changes. The offense has grown over the past five seasons...how do you now justify that?

And don't substitute your own agenda for another's view. I haven't yet stated what my opinion is...for your education.

Don't like repetition, don't commit the same procedural errors...oh, and learn about sentence structure and listen. More is whizzing by those ears of yours, than ********...
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
The writer is just trying to cover for Jerry's horrible decision making.

This offseason has been a disaster ....... and its directly because of Jerry's choices as a GM

I think Garrett has played a role in this as wel
The writer is just trying to cover for Jerry's horrible decision making.

This offseason has been a disaster ....... and its directly because of Jerry's choices as a GM

I think Garrett’s decisions have contributed as well. I think this was very much a Garrett draft. In fact, Garrett wanted EE so badly that he was reportedly pushing Jerry to make the pick right away instead of waiting to see what deals develop. I wasn’t for the EE draft pick, but we could have traded down to 6th overall, picked up a 3rd rounder and use that in a trade up to get Lynch. I believe that Jaylon Smith was a Garrett pick (RKG type of player whose brother plays for the Cowboys) and I will be shocked if he plays this year. D-Law was also a Garrett pick based on Marinelli.


With that being said, having worked in business for over 15 years, one person’s bad decisions can overturn the apple cart and lead to others to make bad decisions that they normally wouldn’t make. So Jerry certainly deserves a lot of blame and perhaps that played a role in Garrett’s goofiness. But, I hate to deflect the blame away from Garrett. The decision to sign Hardy shouldn’t have been that far reaching of an impact if he didn’t turn out well. He was signed on a ‘pay-for-play’ contract and Garrett couldn’t even remotely keep the hysteria down on that one.


And yes, I know Jerry hired Garrett. But as far as I’m concerned, Garrett has not done a good job and Jerry has given him plenty of opportunity that few coaches ever get.




YR
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
Could be, I have been known from time to time...

;)

But in all seriousness, whether I agree with the take or respect the writer or not, I do sincerely appreciate the time you take to share these articles with the rest of the forum.

:thumbup:

Thanks, Stash...I try to be an asset. I'm sorry if we sometimes bump heads...all is good. Let's have some fun this year...:)
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,017
Reaction score
22,609
I think Garrett has played a role in this as wel


I think Garrett’s decisions have contributed as well. I think this was very much a Garrett draft. In fact, Garrett wanted EE so badly that he was reportedly pushing Jerry to make the pick right away instead of waiting to see what deals develop. I wasn’t for the EE draft pick, but we could have traded down to 6th overall, picked up a 3rd rounder and use that in a trade up to get Lynch. I believe that Jaylon Smith was a Garrett pick (RKG type of player whose brother plays for the Cowboys) and I will be shocked if he plays this year. D-Law was also a Garrett pick based on Marinelli.


With that being said, having worked in business for over 15 years, one person’s bad decisions can overturn the apple cart and lead to others to make bad decisions that they normally wouldn’t make. So Jerry certainly deserves a lot of blame and perhaps that played a role in Garrett’s goofiness. But, I hate to deflect the blame away from Garrett. The decision to sign Hardy shouldn’t have been that far reaching of an impact if he didn’t turn out well. He was signed on a ‘pay-for-play’ contract and Garrett couldn’t even remotely keep the hysteria down on that one.


And yes, I know Jerry hired Garrett. But as far as I’m concerned, Garrett has not done a good job and Jerry has given him plenty of opportunity that few coaches ever get.




YR

Good post, Yakuza...
 
Top