Seems to me anything is play for the draft. We picked up two vet dt and safety. Maybe they draft wideout then cb or safety then dt. Or hell you can wait until round 2-3 for a great receiver as well. We have options now
It would be criminal to pass on lamb if he's on the board when we pick.If CeeDee Lamb or Henry Ruggs III are there at 17, it’s going to be hard for the Cowboys to pass on either of those guys even though there are bigger needs on defense.
If CeeDee Lamb or Henry Ruggs III are there at 17, it’s going to be hard for the Cowboys to pass on either of those guys even though there are bigger needs on defense.
We've had Tavon Austin the last 2 years, His sub 4.4 speed didn't help us very much.
Dak also had receiving Corp that had one of the most drops some that were for TDs that could have won some games.
I want someone like Irving, AB or Steve Smith that is a dawg when it matters the most.
If CeeDee Lamb or Henry Ruggs III are there at 17, it’s going to be hard for the Cowboys to pass on either of those guys even though there are bigger needs on defense.
Because he isn't very good.We've had Tavon Austin the last 2 years, His sub 4.4 speed didn't help us very much.
Mahomes 11th at 65.9%, Dak 13th at 65.1% for 2019
Mahomes 3 years at 65.9%, Dak 4 years at 65.8%
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/passing.htm#passing::pass_cmp_perc
Just thought I would point that out about the accuracy part. (waiting for the ...but Mahomes won a SB crowd to chime in...) (yes, he did but he had a better coach also )
And we do have some speed on the roster, so the thing is, we can get the same type of player, and not know what you have on day 3. So do they use a high draft pick on a WR that has speed which would have to be a slot guy. That to me fellas in the luxury category when they need defense more. Unless he truly is the BPA at the time far above any other player.
Johnson has that speed, and they know what they have, however I am not sure he is a slot guy, and had a lot of drops.
Smith, can be that guy if this new and better staff can see that.
Draft choice, as I said only if a sure fire guy is there that stands out over any other players. If close, I would stay with defense IMO.
But we do need that guy that can return punts and kicks, though Pollard was returning kicks. A speedy CB can return punts though too.
What are you disagreeing with? What do the Packers receivers have to do with Henry Ruggs?I disagree about Ruggs. Outside of Cobb, the Packers had receivers with size, Nelson was their #1 WR for year's.
Because they are that good. Go watch the film.Why would Dallas bother drafting a WR that high when they already have Cooper and Gallup?
Unless you NEED a #1 WR type, this is not the draft to be taking one high. plenty of good talent in the pool.
Sean McVayBecause of the player and coaching.
They are not going to draft a slot, undersized receiver in the 1st rd.What are you disagreeing with? What do the Packers receivers have to do with Henry Ruggs?
Ding ding ding!!!!!!Jerry rice was not a speedster. What is needed are great route runners and a coaching staff that can design game plans that play to their receivers strengths.
Because they are that good. Go watch the film.
Dak is an Accurate QB , you don’t throw for 5,000 yards and 30 TDs without accuracy.