Agreed. But I think sometimes we equate poor QB play with losses even when there are other reasons or bigger reasons we lost. When your defense isn't good enough or you don't have a good run game, then a QB can throw three touchdowns and one interception and the focus is going to be on that one interception. When the team is good enough to overcome that interception, then the focus is on the three TDs.
I've often said with Romo that his mistakes were magnified because of how bad the defense was. There's no leeway for a bad play when your defense is bad. The same has held true for Prescott IMO. They both have made their share of mistakes, but with Staubach and Aikman, we could overcome those errors with a defensive stand or the defense getting the ball back when the same has not proven true for the most part with Romo or Dak. I think both players would be viewed differently if they had played on those '70s and '90s' teams. I can't say they would have had the same level of success as the Hall of Famers, but it would definitely be more than they have had. Of course, that should be relatively easy to see, but some of our fans seem to be blinded to it. Of course, they are probably also believe that wins and losses are a QB stat.
