Bates
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 307
- Reaction score
- 374
Our front office, run by amateurs.
Are we surprised?
What a bad look.
what’s the front office got to do with this?
Our front office, run by amateurs.
Are we surprised?
What a bad look.
I'm sure the club gets the details of this complaint and for the HC to do the same thing for a second year in a row is inexcusable. Someone needs to hold that overpaid paperweight accountable
They are responsible for football operationswhat’s the front office got to do with this?
Oh lawd. Everything negative that happens to us is 'spiracy now. Was there rain at practice? Goodell ordered that too, lol.
Sorry Dre. This one was more descriptive so it has more traction. You have to know the nuance of gaining "outrage" publicity for your thread. This one did it better. Did you not see the 'spiracy folk flock to this thread and not the other? They were drawn here like moths to florescent lighting. I don't think there are rules against bumping your own thread 90 times a day though.
Did you read what they got hit for last year. Things like tempo, intensity, contact and going to the ground. It’s not like he had them out there doing Oklahoma drills. Maybe we go for a 3 peat next year.
They are responsible for football operations
The buck stops there.
Well. They got fined for too much contact in OTAS. After the “nfl” viewed the recordings of the practices.And Archer is known for not having bias ever? I mean, working in the media and all where attention/publicity is the name of the game.
So to even have a working theory of "bias" in this case, please tell me which of the following information you have:
1. The NFL's standard for practices at OTAs
2. What the Cowboys allegedly did to violate the NFL's standard
3. Examples of other teams doing the same prohibited actions the Cowboys are being fined for, yet not being fined themselves
If you have any semblance of any of those things, you'd be on your way to showing bias in this case. Do you have any? Oh wait, let me add one more choice:
4. None of the freakin' above so I'll just whine "victim" with no basis whatsoever
So please tell me "4," er, I mean state which you have so I can examine your claims for accuracy.
Doesn't matter. He's in charge or he is atleast paid to be. It's cost them another practice, one they need alot more than these incidental contacts. Either way we haven't had this level of ignorance or incompetence since Campo.
How badly does anyone need these off-season camps if no contact, even in shorts and no shoulder pads, is allowed. We went with one instead of 3 of these sessions this year. So why would anyone with the Cowboys care that we are having one session of minicamp cut next year. Maybe we prefer one hard, competitive practice over 3 walkthroughs with 7 on 7 drills.Doesn't matter. He's in charge or he is atleast paid to be. It's cost them another practice, one they need alot more than these incidental contacts. Either way we haven't had this level of ignorance or incompetence since Campo.
Certain people like to complain , these guys were working too hard. Maybe Mike knew it and canceled the last 2 days
I'm confused I thought we lust tanked the off season
but is it really practice if they can’t be intense, have contact, and players hitting the ground? But I get your point.
How badly does anyone need these off-season camps if no contact, even in shorts and no shoulder pads, is allowed. We went with one instead of 3 of these sessions this year. So why would anyone with the Cowboys care that we are having one session of minicamp cut next year. Maybe we prefer one hard, competitive practice over 3 walkthroughs with 7 on 7 drills.
Well. They got fined for too much contact in OTAS. After the “nfl” viewed the recordings of the practices.
According to archer (who’s been watching off season practices since 1997) there was no difference in anything he’s ever seen.
please continue to rant about how there is no possibility of bias against certain teams errrr owners.