- Messages
- 102,123
- Reaction score
- 113,516
Oh I always thought who was announced as the starter and takes the field for the first series.Snap counts is how you measure who the true starter is.
You know - actually starting the game.
Oh I always thought who was announced as the starter and takes the field for the first series.Snap counts is how you measure who the true starter is.
That's a really pointless distinction, and you know it. Just because they ran a formation that had Tolbert in it on the first play, doesn't really mean he's the starter or has moved up on the depth chart.Oh I always thought who was announced as the starter and takes the field for the first series.
You know - actually starting the game.
It wasn't just one game either. Just admit you're wrong lolJust admit you're wrong lol
No, it was one game, when he started against Washington.It wasn't just one game either. Just admit you're wrong lol
Literally right there in the graphics giving the starting lineup was his name.
So he was the starter in those games. Good to know.Games Tolbert started:
2 - NYJ
5 - SF
8 - PHI
9 - NYG
12 - SEA
17 - WAS
Which is not the point you made. You said he was the starter at the end of the season. Not only did he not start in their final game, he started as much early in the year as late.So he was the starter in those games. Good to know.
He started week 17.Which is not the point you made. You said he was the starter at the end of the season.
Is it the last game? No. Is it a trend? No. Is it a different data point than we saw earlier? No.He started week 17.
That's at the end of the season - no?
I'm not.This is a stupid hill to die on.