Problem with restructures is you lock the player into being untradable or uncuttable for more seasons. Which players with monster contracts (beyond Zach Martin) are you comfortable being handcuffed to for 4, 5, 6 more years?
THIS.
THIS should be required Front Office reading.
The simple restructuring answer for the undeserved perpetuates the problem it does not improve it.
The proper risk reward assessment is to make the 1st NFL calendar day, pre or post June cut of the existing contract and move on.
They did it with Jaylon in season.
The short term sacrifice serves the better short to long term future than this credit card with compounded interest approach everyone thinks is the best alternative.
It ain't.
IF the front office has so hamstrung the cap of its roster so as not to even be able to pay a game day 53 then I think everyone knows the answer. If not I'll further spell it out.
DO NOT write inflated contracts in the first place.
It's NOT some supposed market value OR proving to take care of your children mindset which is the Dallas approach.
I guess, as with many topics concerning this team is IF the same decision makers remain in charge...
The same poor contract decisions will be made.
And the same bull**** undeserved restructures will continue.