doomsday808
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,539
- Reaction score
- 1,383
Question is, what number is Luepke going to end up with?
Don't know if I'd go that far. Most of these signings are low-end expensewise, the trades are third-day value trades, etc. I'm pleased with the direction overall, but I don't buy it as all-in. The Rams trading for All-Pro Myles Garrett and signing the All-Pro Trent McDuffie is more what I consider "all in." But you did say as all in as this team can be, and that's probably true.For the price tag (as outlandish as it may appear to mere mortals), it's tough to paint this acquisition as a negative.
Everyone clamored for Jerry & Stephen to get off their arses & DO something this offseason. What naysayer among you is now willing to assume the podium and claim they haven't?
I think the team is as "all-in" as "all-in" can be this year.
If its more then the Vet min, its too much for Cowboyszone.Are people really saying 5.5M is expensive in today’s NFL? Cmon man.
Miller has worn 58, 40 and 24, so I guess it's a question of what number does he want. 58 is currently worn by Isaiah Land, 40 by Luepke and 24 by Hooker.Question is, what number is Luepke going to end up with?
There were only 3 players in the NFL last year with 15 or more sacks.We don't have a 15 sack guy on the roster.
I like that, sonds like something thor would say lol.For the price tag (as outlandish as it may appear to mere mortals)
You are right….I can’t. But I know none of them made it to the Super Bowl. It isn’t important to have one stud. Having multiple threats that can get pressure is much more important. You can scheme against one guy.There were only 3 players in the NFL last year with 15 or more sacks.
I'll bet you can't name all 3 and I will spot you one with Garrett. No cheating!
