We all know how this will end.
With us losing a win and you're in game against Washington. And Romo getting all the blame, after going 7-1 with probably the highest QBR in the league history or something.
Unfortunately Apollo, I fear this will end negatively for Romo in nearly every scenario barring a win out situation. If he loses 4 or more , they will say "see, Romo wasn't that good, he couldn't make a difference when he came back....it was Murray that was the reason we had success last year". If we lose 2-3 games, they will say "see, he is just an average QB lie we always said and should never be considered an elite QB" if he loses 1 game in the last 2 games, he will be considered a chocker, since most likely we will still be in it if we 5 straight. If he loses only 1 -2 in the first two games, (first game back or against the undefeated panthers) but wins the remaining he will be looked upon favorably but put in that second tier of QBS (6-10 best in the NFL).
The reality is as Parcells says, you are what your record says you are, and this team is a team that without its starting QB cannot win a single game without its starting QB (0-8) since last year. That is a testament of how bad the coaches are, how bad the defense is ( I don't care if they held teams to 10 -13 points - when you can't get a stop win you need it most - in 5 of the last six games, you are bad). The OL is overrated compared to where we thought they are, and our depth sucks. Romo may have aloud us to get in to the post season, but I can't believe we would have been good enough to win a SB looking at this team/. Another Parcelism that is applicable is after last year we "WERE SUCKED"