Cowboys vs Commanders '08 breakdown

dmq

If I'm so pretty, why am I available?
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
941
This was on a Commanders website, but I thought it would make interesting conversation.

http://mvn.com/nfl-Commanders/2008/06...boys-breakdown/

Commanders vs. Cowboys: Breakdown
By Greg Trippiedi | June 17th, 2008
E-mail | Print | Share

An idea that Rob Calonge is having fun with at MVN’s Raiders blog, Thoughts from the Dark Side, is a position by position matchup idea with the Raiders’ opponents in the AFC West.

For the Commanders, it will be critical how well they play against their own division. Arguably the three or four toughest games on the schedule are all in the division, and the best way — the ONLY way the Commanders can be competitive in the NFC East this year — is to do better than expected in divisional games. The Commanders will be required to play above their talent level in these games, something that will not be an easy task.

Calonge uses a quantitative points system to see just where the Raiders rank amongst their divison, but I won’t get quite so scientific. I’ll just examine the key matchups, and pick a winner at the end.

Matchup #1: Jason Campbell vs. Terrence Newman, Anthony Henry, and Pac Man Jones

The Quarterbacks are going to get matched up against the corners in this one for one big reason: the only factor we know that alters a QB’s chance of success is the strength of the opposing corners. Conventional wisdom would probably match the receivers and corners, but research shows that receivers earn a majority of their value after the catch: once the pass is completed and the corner is irrelivant. Therefore, it makes the most sense to match up Quarter- and Corner-backs to see which team has the advantage with the pass.

Dallas struggled in pass d last year, in part because a lack of top end speed at the safety position, but mainly because they didn’t have anyone to play across from Terrence Newman. Enter the Pac Man. One would think Pac Man immediately bolsters the Cowboys pass D, but history suggests that his time away from football will make him a short term liability. In the future, this looks like a fearsome unit for the Cowboys, as Jones gets back into things, and first rounder Mike Jenkins develops.

Right now, there’s a big advantage for Jason Campbell and the Commanders here.

Matchup #2: Tony Romo vs. Shawn Springs, Fred Smoot, and Carlos Rogers

When healthy, there is no doubt that the Commanders have great depth at corner. Of course, when a unit isn’t healthy, like this one is, depth becomes a pipe dream.

Tony Romo is a guy who likes to buy time in the pocket and use all his receivers. You can bet if there is a weakness in the Commanders secondary: maybe Smoot bites on a pump, or Rogers gets beat off the line, or rookie Justin Tryon is matched up on Terrell Owens in the slot — Romo is going to take advantage of it.

This is a sizable advantage for the Dallas Cowboys.

Matchup #3: Clinton Portis vs. Bradie James, DeMarcus Ware, Anthony Spencer, and Zach Thomas

Portis has never done real well against Dallas in his career. In 7 career games against the Cowboys, Portis has hit 100 yards just twice. His best game in the series came in the 35-7 massacre of Dallas at FedEx Field back in 2005.

Portis seems to disappear in most of the games. 4 times in this series, Portis has failed to run for 4 YPC in the game. Credit the Dallas Linebackers for chasing Portis down all over the field in the past.

There is no reason to think this trend will stop here. Advantage Cowboys.

Matchup #4: Marion Barber vs. Marcus Washington, London Fletcher, and Rocky McIntosh

The Commanders defense had one thing going for it all year in 2007: they simply would not allow long runs. Marion Barber does many, many things very, very well, but if there’s a knock on him, it’s that he doesn’t break the long run.

In 5 games against Washington, Marion Barber has never seen more than 10 carries, and has never rushed for more than 50 yards. He’s done alright, save the last game of last year when he lost six yards in as many carries.

This is a projection for the most part; Barber should have no big issue grinding out gains against the Commanders run defense, which is good for the Cowboys, but the propensity of the Commanders to stop the big play means that Barber won’t explode against the Commanders.

No real advantage in this one.

Matchup #5: Santana Moss, Malcolm Kelly, and Antwaan Randle El vs. Roy Williams and Ken Hamlin

For years now, the Commanders’ receivers have exceled in making yards after the catch. In recent years, that production has been down ever so slightly with injuries to Randle El and Moss.

Keep in mind though who the competition is here. Roy Williams has a lot to prove this season, as his honeymoon as the favored safety of Madden Fanboys is really a thing of the past. Even the most fickle member of the media realizes that Williams’ coverage skills are lacking at best. Hamlin is a lot better in coverage, but he’s a strong safety only by necessity, neither can really stay with Moss or Randle El should Jason Campbell put the ball on the money.

In no small part to the advantage that Campbell gives his receivers over the Dallas corners, the receivers have a sizable edge against the Dallas safeties, especially in the open field.

Matchup #6: Terrell Owens, Patrick Crayton, and Terry Glenn vs. LaRon Landry and Reed Doughty

Owens has been somewhat of a workhorse for the Cowboys since he signed two years ago, but Crayton was inconsistent last year and Glenn was injured throughout last season.

On the other side of the ball, Landry is one of the best young safeties in the game today. Owens may get the publicity, but his experience gives him no decisive edge in the open field against Landry’s athleticism. The same goes for Crayton and Glenn: these guys really don’t have what it takes to get open deep, and or turn small completions into big games against Landry. If the Cowboys can isolate Doughty, and get Landry out of the play, this is another story, but whether that can be done remains to be seen.

Advantage Commanders.

Matchup #7: Chris Cooley and Mike Sellers vs. James, Thomas, and Williams

Cooley and Sellers are the creme de la creme at their respective positions in the NFC. Cooley is absolutely uncoverable, and is a load after the catch. Where this matchup gets interesting is in the run blocking game. Cooley is totally capable of blocking Williams on a running play, but may struggle to handle Zach Thomas or Bradie James. Sellers is certainly strong enough to block those guys against the run, but lacks Cooley’s feet in pass blocking, and is a liability against a blitz.

For their skill in the passing game, the Commanders get a small, tiny edge.

Matchup # 8: Jason Witten and Martellius Bennett vs. Washington, Fletcher, and Doughty

The Commanders have the players to cover the tight end: but Jason Witten is no normal tight end. Witten might be the best receiving tight end in the NFC. Doughty can’t handle him for sure. If he’s lined up tight, Washington can get a jam on him, but if he’s in the slot, Washington can’t handle him. If he goes down the middle of the field, London Fletcher is excellent at covering that area, but even he can’t prevent a great deep post from Romo to Witten.

Bennett is a great receiving TE prospect, and though the Commanders can handle his skill set if he were the only tight end, as long as Witten is on the field, the Commanders probably won’t be able to match up with Bennett either.

Huge advantage to Dallas.

Matchup #9: Randy Thomas and Casey Rabach vs. Tank Johnson and Chris Canty

Johnson is probably too undersized to be a true nose tackle, but he’s very quick and probably all that Casey Rabach can handle. Rabach will get help from Pete Kendall against Johnson when there is no blitz, but that will leave Chris Canty one on one with Randy Thomas.

As good as Canty is, a healthy Thomas can do more than neutralize him. Canty, a 300 lb end, might be a load to move in the run game, but the Commanders can get him moving backwards using a double team scrape technique.

No advantage here, and that’s arguably a win for the Commanders.

Matchup #10: Leonard Davis vs. Cornelius Griffin

The maturation of Anthony means one thing for Corneilius Griffin: more single teams.

That’s a good thing, but Leonard Davis had a heck of a year last year, and Griffin usually finds himself banged up early in the year. Maybe a healthy Griffin gets the edge in this matchup, but that’s an assumption I can’t make in good faith. Advantage Cowboys.

Matchup #11: Chris Samuels and Jon Jansen vs. Marcus Spears, Ware, and Spencer

When Samuels and Jansen are both on the field, the Commanders seem to have no trouble at all protecting their passer. DeMarcus Ware is an elite pass rusher in this league, and gives Samuels everything he can handle every time they meet, but because Samuels is good enough to nullify his pass rush, Dallas often leaves him in coverage against the Commanders.

Spears is not a serious pass rushing threat, and can be handled easily. Spencer is still an unknown, and could provide Dallas the edge in this matchup if he can break out. Until then, the Commanders hold a small advantage.

Matchup #12: Flozell Adams and Marc Columbo vs. Andre Carter and Phillip Daniels

Carter is coming off a great year, but so is Adams. Both, at one point, were thought to be busts, and nowadays, both players dominate their mediocre competition.

Columbo has been less than stellar in his career, and Phillip Daniels can still bring the pass rush, though he lacks the explosiveness to sack the passer consistently.

There is no distinct edge here.

Commanders/Cowboys Final Verdict

Since there was no particular advantage on either line, those easy turnovers: the bad decisions forced by immense pressure, the sack strips that change football games, really aren’t more likely to occur to one team than the other. Both teams should have immense success throwing the football against each other, especially in the middle of the field.

The Cowboys will have more success in these matchups if they stay patient and try to grind out the Commanders. Meanwhile, the Commanders will have the best chance to win if they get the ball to their playmakers in the open field, and let them turn big throws by Jason Campbell into spectacular touchdowns.

In football, the team that executes more consistently generally has an advantage. There is no doubt in my mind that when these teams meet in Dallas, that consistency advantage is held by the Dallas Cowboys. Clinton Portis always struggles in Dallas, and Marion Barber has the potential to run right at London Fletcher for 5 yard chunks of yardage.

Because of the dominance of the Commanders’ passing game at home, this series seems destined for a split. I just don’t think the Cowboys’ defense is capable of keeping the Commanders off the scoreboard.

At home, I predict that the Commanders will beat the Cowboys at FedEx Field for the fourth straight year, on the road, the Commanders are probably in for a little tougher of a time. Unless Portis can get going on the ground, the Skins could be in for their 3rd straight defeat at Texas Stadium.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
"The Quarterbacks are going to get matched up against the corners in this one for one big reason: the only factor we know that alters a QB’s chance of success is the strength of the opposing corners"

I stopped reading right there. Pass rush has nothing to do with altering the QB's chance of success, does it? Tell that to Brady.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,558
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This garbage sgould have been left wherever it was found.

Just because some fool writes something on the internet, doesn't make him a writer. And it obviously doesn't mesan he knows what he's talking about.

This is beyond awful......

:angryno:
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,104
Reaction score
11,428
Matchup #1: Jason Campbell vs. Terrence Newman, Anthony Henry, and Pac Man Jones

The Quarterbacks are going to get matched up against the corners in this one for one big reason: the only factor we know that alters a QB’s chance of success is the strength of the opposing corners. Conventional wisdom would probably match the receivers and corners, but research shows that receivers earn a majority of their value after the catch: once the pass is completed and the corner is irrelivant. Therefore, it makes the most sense to match up Quarter- and Corner-backs to see which team has the advantage with the pass.

Dallas struggled in pass d last year, in part because a lack of top end speed at the safety position, but mainly because they didn’t have anyone to play across from Terrence Newman. Enter the Pac Man. One would think Pac Man immediately bolsters the Cowboys pass D, but history suggests that his time away from football will make him a short term liability. In the future, this looks like a fearsome unit for the Cowboys, as Jones gets back into things, and first rounder Mike Jenkins develops.

Right now, there’s a big advantage for Jason Campbell and the Commanders here.
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:

I'm sorry, was there more after this?
 

sacase

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
2,612
Must be a skins fan writing this. He doesn't even know the Dallas starters......its pure filth
 

TX_Yid

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,439
Reaction score
1,579
This reads like Danny boy's christmas letter to Santa Claus.
 

redskins1

Benched
Messages
693
Reaction score
0
that was a pretty intresting article..i think our head to head matchup will come down to who can run the ball the best,both offenses will be able to throw the ball fairly easy..but who will run the football the best? that will be the key...GO SKINS!!!
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,558
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
redskins1;2121579 said:
that was a pretty intresting article..i think our head to head matchup will come down to who can run the ball the best,both offenses will be able to throw the ball fairly easy..but who will run the football the best? that will be the key...GO SKINS!!!

Looks like you're half right to me.....
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
redskins1;2121579 said:
that was a pretty intresting article..i think our head to head matchup will come down to who can run the ball the best,both offenses will be able to throw the ball fairly easy..but who will run the football the best? that will be the key...GO SKINS!!!

It's not an article. It's more blog post than article.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
This analysis is mind boggling. Why would rank receivers vs. safeties? The overwhelming majority of WR's in the NFL are covered by corners unless there's zone coverage. Then he looks at offensive tackles and has Samuels and Jansen versus Ware, Spencer, and Spears...no Greg Ellis. I can disagree with opinions and live with that, but the matchups make no sense. That being said, I find this type of illogical matchups typical of Skins fans. If I had a dime for every time a Skins fan tried to compare WR's and wound up comparing Crayton to Santana Moss instead of Owens to Santana Moss, I'd have a good chunk of change.




YAKUZA
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Yakuza Rich;2121600 said:
This analysis is mind boggling. Why would rank receivers vs. safeties? The overwhelming majority of WR's in the NFL are covered by corners unless there's zone coverage. Then he looks at offensive tackles and has Samuels and Jansen versus Ware, Spencer, and Spears...no Greg Ellis. I can disagree with opinions and live with that, but the matchups make no sense. That being said, I find this type of illogical matchups typical of Skins fans. If I had a dime for every time a Skins fan tried to compare WR's and wound up comparing Crayton to Santana Moss instead of Owens to Santana Moss, I'd have a good chunk of change.




YAKUZA

Uh, duh, because he already used up cornerbacks against the QBs. Can't use CB's twice, that would ruin the entire validity of the "article".
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
redskins1;2121579 said:
that was a pretty intresting article..i think our head to head matchup will come down to who can run the ball the best,both offenses will be able to throw the ball fairly easy..but who will run the football the best? that will be the key...GO SKINS!!!


Actually statistics show that the team that wins the passing game battle goes on to win 80% of the time.

In fact, here's a look at certain statistics and their correlation coefficient to winning in 2007. The close the number is +1, the stronger of a positive correlation to winning the statistic has.

1. Points Scored 0.872715823970838
2. Yards/Play Differential 0.871197515680981
3. QBRD 0.843308240805477
4. Yards/Pass Attempt Differential 0.84312958946839
5. QB Rating 0.782265822862796
6. Yards/Pass Attempt 0.759023807663463
7. Total Yards Gained 0.75677635562317
8. Yards/Play Gained 0.741537042388235
9. Points Allowed 0.727189908611979
10. TD Passes 0.722680047074655
11. Yards/Pass Attempt Allowed 0.699166664938991
12. 40+ Yard Pass Plays 0.695347493829462
13. Turnover Margin 0.632695067079508
14. 3rd Down % Differential 0.624148877749829
15. 3rd Pct Converted 0.614419326663923
16. Sck Allowed 0.61418752786668
17. Yards/Play Allowed 0.592750651235402
18. QB Rate Allowed 0.591625814050439
19. TD runs 0.58955977752626
20. Rush Yards Allowed 0.558619317833803
21. Total Yards Passing 0.555102123492808
22. Pass Completion % Differential 0.537204923819817
23. Sacks 0.529314532204219
24. Pass Completion Percentage 0.520487301082189
25. 20+ Pass Plays 0.513982522902106
26. Rush TDs Allowed 0.497128111674507
27. 20+ Yards Allowed Rush 0.446959349044607
28. Time of Possession 0.435520733024538
29. Int Allowed 0.428204969800446
30. Interceptions 0.41219140580277
31. 40+ Yards Allowed Rush 0.345217512315757
32. 20+ pass allowed 0.344867935764855
33. Rushing Yards Gained 0.338104226578844
34. Avg Yards Per Rushing Carry 0.244395099349822
35. TD Pass allowed 0.237797432802835
36. 3rd Pct Conversion Allowed 0.225442866615854
37. Pass Completion Percentage Allowed 0.224520863405274
38. 40+ yard carries 0.213014036024759
39. Yds Pass Allowed 0.178806436338699
40. Pen Yds Allowed 0.136940327671747
41. 20+ yard runs 0.135488631035452
42. Yards Allowed Per carry 0.126514572731791
43. Pen Yds 0.0668466475484812
44. 40+ pass allowed -0.529314532204219

QBRD (#3 on the list) stands for QB Rating Differential. This takes the team's offensive QB rating and subtracts their QB rating allowed on defense. Thus, the higher the QBRD, the more likely a team will win games.

We don't see a running game stat until #19 (TD runs allowed). However 5 of the top 10 stats are passing game related statistics.






YAKUZA
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
TheCount;2121604 said:
Uh, duh, because he already used up cornerbacks against the QBs. Can't use CB's twice, that would ruin the entire validity of the "article".

Who says you can't use CB's twice? Safeties vs. WR's just doesn't make sense. It's like if I were going to put TE's vs. strongside DE. Technically they do face off against each other in blocking, but TE's can also block on the weakside or go out for a pass.




YAKUZA
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,104
Reaction score
11,428
Yakuza Rich;2121609 said:
Who says you can't use CB's twice? Safeties vs. WR's just doesn't make sense.
None of this "article" made sense.

Except in Bizarro Skins Land.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
I like how he just dismisses Ware and says he will just be struck in coverage, then gives the advantage to the Skins. Nice work.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Yakuza Rich;2121609 said:
Who says you can't use CB's twice? Safeties vs. WR's just doesn't make sense. It's like if I were going to put TE's vs. strongside DE. Technically they do face off against each other in blocking, but TE's can also block on the weakside or go out for a pass.




YAKUZA

I think you missed my sarcasm.
 
Top