Cowboys vs. Dolphins Will Be the First Game in NFL History

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,482
Reaction score
6,427
Just thought I’d share. Wild.

Twitter users are already calling it, “The Fraud Bowl” lol.



Keeping tract of this is meaningless. Currently 19 out of 32 teams are at or below .500, which only leaves 11 teams. We don't make the schedule. If we lost to Seattle and the Rams they both would have a winning record.

Show me a team with 4 wins over a team with a winning record? Maybe only the Niners.
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,648
Reaction score
21,595
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Just thought I’d share. Wild.

Twitter users are already calling it, “The Fraud Bowl” lol.



Will also be the first game in history where both WR's go for 200 yards, and the RB goes for 200 yards against us!!! Waddle/Hill
 

Bagman

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,974
Reaction score
2,851
Imagine a game between 2 first place teams in week 16, both teams being 10-4. These teams have the #1 and #2 scoring offenses in the NFL. Exciting Pro Bowl players all over the field from both teams. And then some little geek with a computer found this obscure and irrelevant piece of trivia. And then CBS posted it for all the sheep out there to cling to their Anti-Cowboys agenda. WOW.......Guys, there's at least 28-29 teams out there right now that would kill to be as "disappointing" as Dallas' uninspiring season.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,688
Reaction score
50,149
Hurling insults at anyone who dares to disagree with you. Either you were raised poorly or have a severe case of online Tourette syndrome.
You definitely have online Tourette Syndrome...of the vocal orifice because you spew nothing but crap, Austin boy.
 

BigBlacKahuna

22Cowboys21
Messages
2,817
Reaction score
2,228
To everyone who thinks we’re going to whitewashed by the Dolphins, going to give up 200 yds rushing and 400 yds receiving, why are you going to watch if it’s already a foregone conclusion in your minds that we’re absolutely going to lose the game?

I’m not saying you’re not entitled to you opinion, you most definitely are. I’m just curious as to that fact if you know the Cowboys are that bad, why watch.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,712
Reaction score
4,521
Just thought I’d share. Wild.

Twitter users are already calling it, “The Fraud Bowl” lol.



Both have game managers at QB (Cam was right and flaky girl was wrong with a stupid take). Only one team is committed to run to win and the other has a defense that cannot stop the run.

Lets see what happens with another save by a team running the ball on Philly's defense to win a game.
 

diamonddelts

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,078
Reaction score
5,364
Both have game managers at QB (Cam was right and flaky girl was wrong with a stupid take). Only one team is committed to run to win and the other has a defense that cannot stop the run.

Lets see what happens with another save by a team running the ball on Philly's defense to win a game.
Cam is one to talk. He fell off like a rock after his seventh year in the league. Dak is still putting up big numbers in his 8th year.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,712
Reaction score
4,521
Cam is one to talk. He fell off like a rock after his seventh year in the league. Dak is still putting up big numbers in his 8th year.
Disagree. Cam was a game changer (see Carolina before and after Cam) and the refs allowed him to get beat up not protecting him like other QBs which shortened his career.

Dak puts up numbers like Romo, his numbers do not beat teams in December, and does not take you to a Conference championship game. Cam took his team to a Super Bowl. All defenses had to stop Cam and the majority could not do it until the Super Bowl. Defenses against Dak and the Jonesboys only have to make Dak throw to win. That is not a game changer but a game manager that cannot change the outcome putting his will on the opponents (see Elway, Marino, Manning, etc.)

Dak is a very good game manager. But do not ask him to throw to win without a running game and run stopping defense.
 

diamonddelts

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,078
Reaction score
5,364
Disagree. Cam was a game changer (see Carolina before and after Cam) and the refs allowed him to get beat up not protecting him like other QBs which shortened his career.

Dak puts up numbers like Romo, his numbers do not beat teams in December, and does not take you to a Conference championship game. Cam took his team to a Super Bowl. All defenses had to stop Cam and the majority could not do it until the Super Bowl. Defenses against Dak and the Jonesboys only have to make Dak throw to win. That is not a game changer but a game manager that cannot change the outcome putting his will on the opponents (see Elway, Marino, Manning, etc.)

Dak is a very good game manager. But do not ask him to throw to win without a running game and run stopping defense.
That might be. But his style of play was short lived and did not win a Super Bowl like every other running quarterback before him.
 

Jstopper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,488
Reaction score
8,007
Disagree. Cam was a game changer (see Carolina before and after Cam) and the refs allowed him to get beat up not protecting him like other QBs which shortened his career.

Dak puts up numbers like Romo, his numbers do not beat teams in December, and does not take you to a Conference championship game. Cam took his team to a Super Bowl. All defenses had to stop Cam and the majority could not do it until the Super Bowl. Defenses against Dak and the Jonesboys only have to make Dak throw to win. That is not a game changer but a game manager that cannot change the outcome putting his will on the opponents (see Elway, Marino, Manning, etc.)

Dak is a very good game manager. But do not ask him to throw to win without a running game and run stopping defense.
Yeah maybe your point wouldn't sound so stupid if Dak hadn't been winning most of this season without a running game. Go learn football
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,448
Reaction score
17,523
So, generally speaking, the teams they beat have fewer wins than the teams that beat them......

Gosh, who would have figured?

How many of those teams are losing teams because the Cowboys made them that way?

The Rams and Seahawks would both be 8-6. if they had won their Cowboys game.

The Cowboys can only beat losing teams, some of which are only losing teams because the Cowboys beat them.

And we needed stats to support this logical conclusion?
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,785
Reaction score
66,507
So, generally speaking, the teams they beat have fewer wins than the teams that beat them......

Gosh, who would have figured?

How many of those teams are losing teams because the Cowboys made them that way?

The Rams and Seahawks would both be 8-6. if they had won their Cowboys game.

The Cowboys can only beat losing teams, some of which are only losing teams because the Cowboys beat them.

And we needed stats to support this logical conclusion?
Agreed it’s a garbage stat.

Do you only count their current record? Rams over .500

Over .500 at the time? Jets, Seahawks, Eagles
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,448
Reaction score
17,523
Agreed it’s a garbage stat.

Do you only count their current record? Rams over .500

Over .500 at the time? Jets, Seahawks, Eagles
In practically the same sentence they claim that beating struggling teams by over 20 points proves nothing.

My natural response is, then why didn't all the winning teams beat them by over 20 points?

A Cowboys loss is so negative that it cancels out 5 consecutive victories.
 
Top