waldoputty
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,375
- Reaction score
- 21,163
Who do you think are 'better' than the Cowboys - out of Vikings, Seahawks, Falcons and Eagles.
IMO, Cowboys are probably better than the Eagles, while pretty even matchups with Vikings, Seahawks and Falcons.
I would say NFC is pretty wide open.
Out of these 4, Atlanta has the best offense, with most passing yards, QB is top rated, and #6 in rushing yards. However, their defense are near the bottom in points allowed and similar # of sacks as Dallas.
Vikings, Eagles and Seattle have top defenses being top 3 in points allowed, but Seattle and Vikings are very poor in rushing yards while Eagles are about average in rushing yards.
Vikings has the best defense, leads in sacks, 2nd in points allowed, but dont trust their QB in a big game.
In a big game, Russell Wilson would be more dependable than Vikings and Eagles QB. Not sure if I would prefer Matt Ryan though.
Atlanta has perhaps the best receiver in the league, while receivers for Vikings, Seahawks and Eagles are probably one step below Cowboys.
IMO, Cowboys are probably better than the Eagles, while pretty even matchups with Vikings, Seahawks and Falcons.
I would say NFC is pretty wide open.
Out of these 4, Atlanta has the best offense, with most passing yards, QB is top rated, and #6 in rushing yards. However, their defense are near the bottom in points allowed and similar # of sacks as Dallas.
Vikings, Eagles and Seattle have top defenses being top 3 in points allowed, but Seattle and Vikings are very poor in rushing yards while Eagles are about average in rushing yards.
Vikings has the best defense, leads in sacks, 2nd in points allowed, but dont trust their QB in a big game.
In a big game, Russell Wilson would be more dependable than Vikings and Eagles QB. Not sure if I would prefer Matt Ryan though.
Atlanta has perhaps the best receiver in the league, while receivers for Vikings, Seahawks and Eagles are probably one step below Cowboys.