Cowboys vs. Other NFC elites

[Dale]

We're quietly unbeaten on the road once again -- shaping up similarly to the 2014 season when we won them all in the regular season. As someone said above, this style of play is built to win anywhere. Doesn't guarantee anything, but it means you at least should give yourself a chance each and every week.

As the league's only unbeaten, Minnesota has earned the right to be ranked above us. Much like us, they've overcome a ridiculous amount of injuries. Curious to see if that catches up with them at any point.

I see Atlanta and Seattle as comparable teams.

Philly is suddenly reeling. The defense is getting gouged; the offensive line badly misses Lane Johnson. Don't think they deserve to be on this list at the moment.

 

[robbieruff]

Who do you think are 'better' than the Cowboys - out of Vikings, Seahawks, Falcons and Eagles.
IMO, Cowboys are probably better than the Eagles, while pretty even matchups with Vikings, Seahawks and Falcons.
I would say NFC is pretty wide open.

Out of these 4, Atlanta has the best offense, with most passing yards, QB is top rated, and #6 in rushing yards. However, their defense are near the bottom in points allowed and similar # of sacks as Dallas.

Vikings, Eagles and Seattle have top defenses being top 3 in points allowed, but Seattle and Vikings are very poor in rushing yards while Eagles are about average in rushing yards.
Vikings has the best defense, leads in sacks, 2nd in points allowed, but dont trust their QB in a big game.

In a big game, Russell Wilson would be more dependable than Vikings and Eagles QB. Not sure if I would prefer Matt Ryan though.

Atlanta has perhaps the best receiver in the league, while receivers for Vikings, Seahawks and Eagles are probably one step below Cowboys.

I think we outphysical ATL and play keep away from their offense - but they're dangerous. They shredded Seattle today in the second half and were a missed PI call at the end of th game to win it.

Same with Seattle. We are too big for them up front and they look vulnerable against the pass also. It also appears they may have lost Bennett for some extended time. I think we beat them up like we did Green Bay today. Our lack of pressure makes us vulnerable against Russell and his ability to scramble and extend plays.

Philly plays us tough against the run but I think we're the more complete team at this point.

Vikings D is for real - looks Denver level good. There lack of consistency in running game with AP out is their primary vulnerability as I see it. And I just don't have faith in Bradford playing at a high level for an extended period. But he has surprised me so far.

I like our chances against any of them but I think the Vikings defensive schemes would cause us lots of problems.

 

[Verdict]

I am not sure if there is one "best team" in the NFC. The Vikings have the best defense, but we probably match up better with them than a team like Atlanta. I think we have Seattle's number. They don't scare me.

I think the Eagles are mostly pretenders. Probably a year away from having a SB team. Wentz is good, but he is starting to show his rookie tendencies. Phiily doesn't have a great receiving corps or a dominant running back. They might be a little bit better than us defensively, but our OL is a great equalizer.

I would like to see the Cardinals miss the playoffs. Likewise for the Panthers. Both of those teams can get after your QB.

I would like to see another team bump off Atlanta. They are probably the worst matchup for us.

 

[jobberone]

We are built to win the division. Obviously we can beat a GB although I have no idea what Rodgers problem is. I think we match up well against Seattle. It is Atlanta who we don't match up with well. Our pass rush isn't the greatest and Julio belongs in another galaxy not league. With OScan and Carr healthy along with a still improving Jones we MIGHT be able to play him.

I'll get some laughs about Carr but he can physical Julio but can't cover him entirely as he's too fast. If you put Jones over the top then I think they can stop Julio. Maybe. You need OScan and Claiborne to play the rest along with a decent Church. Then hope Ryan and JJones don't catch fire.

It doesn't matter about playing keep away if a team can strike that quickly. You have to stop them some to stay in the game.

We can beat Atlanta and AFAIC anyone else right now.

 

[jobberone]

I think we outphysical ATL and play keep away from their offense - but they're dangerous. They shredded Seattle today in the second half and were a missed PI call at the end of th game to win it.

Same with Seattle. We are too big for them up front and they look vulnerable against the pass also. It also appears they may have lost Bennett for some extended time. I think we beat them up like we did Green Bay today. Our lack of pressure makes us vulnerable against Russell and his ability to scramble and extend plays.

Philly plays us tough against the run but I think we're the more complete team at this point.

Vikings D is for real - looks Denver level good. There lack of consistency in running game with AP out is their primary vulnerability as I see it. And I just don't have faith in Bradford playing at a high level for an extended period. But he has surprised me so far.

I like our chances against any of them but I think the Vikings defensive schemes would cause us lots of problems.

Agree completely. Vikings are elite defense but not so much on offense. Should be a good game. Hope we play them at home if we both get that far. We should be thinking home field.