Cowboys vs. Refs

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,730
Reaction score
95,249
Refs forgot their blind hatred of the Cowboys when they awarded that fumble to the Cowboys inside the 10.

Or missed the obvious personal foul on the two pointer when Irving smacked Bradford in the head.

There really is nothing more embarrassing than whining about the officials............ especially when the calls appeared legit. The only bonehead one that I thought was possibly a stretch was the clip on Escobar. That was tight.
 

benson

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,112
Reaction score
1,008
There was no other explanation for the refereeing except that they did just enough to ensure that minessota covered the spread.
 

Deep_South

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,030
Reaction score
3,653
Refs missed a roughing the passer and illegal procedure on the 2nd two-point conversion attempt. So, they kind of made up for the rest of it.
 

Seven

Messenger to the football Gods
Messages
19,301
Reaction score
9,892
The on on Scandrick was really bad. His hand was on the shoulder and the other player grabbed his arm and shoved it upward. Even then he never even really touched his face. He may have grazed it but no foul of any kind and it took away an int.
Exactly.....
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,886
Reaction score
12,670
I don't think Dez's TD should have counted. Looked like the ball was outside the pylon even though his feet went inside.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,077
Reaction score
16,851
I would be fine if the refs were not missing blatant holds against the Vikings as well as multiple offensive pass interference penalties. These calls are so one sided one has to consider the reality that we are getting treated unfair.

There isn't any anti-Cowboy agenda, but there is definitely an agenda. It's about the money.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,730
Reaction score
95,249
The call on Scandrick was legit. His hand was on the ear piece and neck area of Rudolph. If you read the illegal hands to the face rule, that's a penalty. It specifies the face, NECK and HEAD area. So yeah, that's technically illegal hands to the face.
 

Virginia-Dave

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,804
Reaction score
3,356
OMG, now these clowns on NFLN are complaining about the no-call on the 2 pt conversion. Saying those penalties should be reviewable. Strange how they don't mention missed penalties when they're against us.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,405
Reaction score
10,074
Dude Free was behind the guy with his arm sticking out holding him from going any further. It was clear as day. You see the guy trying to go one way but unable to because of Free holding on.

Yes in a way that was a hold on Free. However, there were more blatant holds on the Vikings with no holds. Refs need to call it both ways.
 

greatwallofdallas

Well-Known Member
Messages
536
Reaction score
416
Refs needed to keep the score with in the spread. Cowboys closed at -3 point favorites.
The majority of the public was picking the Cowboys to win by more then 3.
Final score was 17-15. How convenient is that?
 
Last edited:

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,685
Reaction score
44,610
The call on Scandrick was legit. His hand was on the ear piece and neck area of Rudolph. If you read the illegal hands to the face rule, that's a penalty. It specifies the face, NECK and HEAD area. So yeah, that's technically illegal hands to the face.

Well, you know what the answer will be to that..."I've seen way worse not called!"
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Geez. Lol

That was a horrible non call on Bradford.

Refs handed Dallas a gift in the end.
 

slomoxn

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,850
Reaction score
1,051
Now they're calling the last
Play of the game "the cowboys got away with one". PLEASE! Several false calls against Dallas, Escobar blocking and the guy turns his back while the play is going, that's not clipping.
 
Top