Cowboyszone Report Card...Alan Ball...GPA = 0.49

D. He wasn't a complete failure, as he didn't outright cost us any games, and he redeemed himself with what appeared to be some better field awareness toward the end of the season (INT comes to mind) but it's absolutely clear that he is not a safety. He's a man-cover, backup cornerback.

The fundamentals just aren't there. The number one thing a safety cannot do (other than fail to continue to backpedal, which Ball did on numerous occasions) is get caught staring into the backfield. He did this countless times. Goal line defense was horrific...as a FS playing near the goal line, you plant your heels on the goal line and play from there -- too often he got caught staring into the backfield and getting sucked up near the line of scrimmage when he was supposed to be patrolling the end zone.

It's also clear that he was afraid to make tackles on larger players (mostly tight ends, not RBs), one of the things that many people were worried about.

All in all, like I said, he was bad. But he wasn't failing bad. An addition of Daniel Manning or Michael Huff would go great lengths to fixing this situation. Ball might find better opportunities to play and get paid in the UFL this upcoming season.
 
Ball's Defensive Passer Rating
105.2
17 of 27, 63.0% 272 yards, 10.1 ypa, 7 td, 2 int

Ball was PFF's 78th ranked safety in 2010 (8th from the bottom). Seven TD allowed in 27 targets. Yes, 1 out of every 4 times Ball was considered to be covering a specific receiver who was thrown at, the result was a touchdown. And this is a player who was originally a cornerback.

Ball is credited with a total of 4 pass defenses and 2 interceptions, which means he allowed more touchdowns (7) than he prevented completions (6).

Pass Defense: F
Run Defense: F
Big Plays: F

Overall: F
 
The embodiment of the defensive albatross that we saw in 2010
 
F for Alan but also a big F for who ever thought that he was a starting caliber NFL FS.
 
He's the worst FS in years... Much better at CB.


Where's the crowd that thought he would be a better fit than Otawge?
 
Wolfpack;3886564 said:
F for Alan but also a big F for who ever thought that he was a starting caliber NFL FS.

Excellent point. How in the world could he have become, and remained our FS? One of the worst starters ever to put on the silver and blue. If this guy doesn't deserve an F on decidedly miserable squad, then who does?
 
As bad as Ball has been getting ripped, I couldn't find it in my heart to fail him completely with an F. So he gets a D minus from me. While he wasn't the absolute worst in the NFL, he was in my opinion in the lower bottom half.

We need a serious upgrade. Patrick Peterson anyone?
 
Doomsay;3886589 said:
Excellent point. How in the world could he have become, and remained our FS?

Ego, is the answer you're looking for.
 
He should get a Z,he was that bad.I still cant believe our coaches trusted him to be our FS.
 
I have to give him a D instead of F as we were clearly one of the poorest prepared, poorest coached, and worst controlled defenses in the whole NFL.
 
Fletch;3886595 said:
As bad as Ball has been getting ripped, I couldn't find it in my heart to fail him completely with an F. So he gets a D minus from me. While he wasn't the absolute worst in the NFL, he was in my opinion in the lower bottom half.

We need a serious upgrade. Patrick Peterson anyone?

Who was worse?
 
A horrible decision from the get go. Position in need of upgrade for several years now.
 
Back
Top