xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,220
- Reaction score
- 64,734
I don't think you have any clue what you're typing or why you're typing it. If you did, you'd respond to my post and not my "approach." If you can't discuss the substance of one's opinion or statement, then question the person who made it and their motives. It's a common tactic for someone who has nothing.
I'll be interested to read your thoughts on how D coordinators are going to lose sleep trying to game plan and defend DMac, Randle and Dunbar since that's the premise that motivated you to be the board enforcer.
What is your point?
Murray had a good season and was a workhorse; however, he is not some all-world RB that can't be replaced. He's not Emmitt or Adrian Peterson.
The Cowboys have multiple RBs now that have talent, but have not proven themselves for one reason or another.
There indeed is no proof that they will be good enough; however, there is also no proof that that can't get the job done. Some of them (McFadden and Ryan Williams) were better RBs in college than Murray. Randle has done well with the opportunities that he has received. Dunbar has flashed ability in a situational role. McFadden is terrific in Pass Blocking and as a Receiver. Nobody has seen a healthy Ryan Williams behind a quality OLine.
The probability of Murray having another good season after being overused and considering his past injury history is not that good. I don't think the probability of him have a great season is much if any higher than the probability of the Cowboys finding a combination of RBs that can get the job done.