Video: Dak’s contract will cripple the Cowboys

[TheMarathonContinues]

You don't like Dak-Lover?
Well, Allen, Darnold, and Wentz beat us bad last season and made Dak look like a 3rd string QB.
SELL DAK or BUST baby!!! LOL....Again I have to ask when Dak leaves for another team are you following him?????

Beating this defense is no accomplishment lol.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Were the problems with the defense the players or just bad coaching.

Its hard to tell. I'd have to lean towards coaching because I've seen Lawrence, Jaylon and LVE play far superior than what they did last season.

 

[reddyuta]

these anti -dak threads are the most pointless ever.He is going to get paid-Dak knows it,the Jones definitely know it and i bet the OP knows it too.

 

[Hardline]

Lol..

Those guys were terrible players though.

Yeah... If we start a terrible QB then we will struggle.

Dalton is far from terrible regardless of what the ESPN highlight watchers and the I only look at statistics crowd think.

If it’s me I’m drafting a guy. I would’ve gone all in on Tua this past draft and even considered Herbert.

Throw Jalen Love in there too.
I would've taken him and ended the Dak crap at the same time.
Dak then would ether wisen up and signed or demanded a trade.

 

[morat1959]

If my opinion ever coincided with this guys opinion..I'd immediately change my stance..I'd be embarrassed more than anything else to be on the same side of any argument as this guy

The truth hurts!

 

[Risen Star]

The truth hurts!

Yep. The guy makes a lot of sense.

 

[morat1959]

these anti -dak threads are the most pointless ever.He is going to get paid-Dak knows it,the Jones definitely know it and i bet the OP knows it too.

You need to stock up on plenty of Kleenex when this doesn’t happen.

 

[morat1959]

Is this guy reading from my script?



Bonus

He’s speaking the truth!

 

[Hardline]

So he's special? Had the greatest receiver of all time and could do nothing with him...that Matthew Stafford?

Jerry Rice never played for the Lions.

Calvin Johnson was a pro bowl WR.
Stafford did do something with him.

 

[LACowboysFan1]

Nobody said he needed a great defense. People just said he needed something better than the worst special teams and the worst team in regards to turnovers. You can't be "the worst at" on 2 out of the 3 facets of the game. That's disaster for any quarterback.

Yes, but if anybody does say that he needs a great defense, it's considered a criticism, meaning he's not good enough to win a SB for the Dallas Cowboys unless he has that, whereas if the Cowboys had another quarterback, e.g. Dalton taking over, it would happen.

Russell Wilson is widely considered one of, and by many, the best NFL quarterbacks. An "elite" quarterback, one who can "carry the team on his back" and "make everyone around him better".

Yet the two years he "led" his team to the Super Bowl, Seattle had the number one overall defense. Without that, he's not been back to the Super Bowl.

So to pose a question, does the "elite" quarterback, one that can win SBs without a great defense, really exist? The last SB P. Manning won, he had an poor, comparatively speaking, regular and playoff season. But he still "won" the SB. How, if he wasn't a "great" quarterback at the time.

The number one, and by definition therefore, great defense was undoubtedly a massive part of that season.

Of course it's not that simple, the Saints deserved to be in the SB a couple more times, based on their regular season, but one poor defensive play and one poor officiating call ruined those seasons' opportunity. Having the great offense/defense was negated by those two plays, both were very late game plays, normally one play doesn't define a game, but if the plays are the last one of the game, or close enough to it, they do. Patriots were extremely lucky to win their last SB, again a very late game play, the absolutely imbecilic play call probably (but you never know, maybe Beast mode would have fumbled, etc.) cost them a second SB win. Aaron Rodgers is "elite", by nearly all accounts, but he's only been to one SB.

Just saying that to concentrate on having the great defense or offense, and achieving that, doesn't guarantee championships. Can't place the blame on Dak, or the defense, or the coaching entirely, but they all play a part in winning or losing.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Calvin Johnson was a pro bowl WR.
Stafford did do something with him.

Oh please.

Yeah Stafford made this happen lol.

 

[Ranching]

Is this guy reading from my script?



Bonus

Lol!!! You a genius!! Dak is gonna get paid, get over it!

 

[KJJ]

What would cripple the team is not having a capable QB.

 

[CATCH17]

these anti -dak threads are the most pointless ever.He is going to get paid-Dak knows it,the Jones definitely know it and i bet the OP knows it too.

You’re right.

I do know he will get paid.

I also know that we will not be closer to getting to a Superbowl for it.

 

[Whirlwin]

Lmao. How many times have I heard this . The salary cap has never been an issue for the Cowboys and it never will be. We always find a way. From restructuring all the way up to inflated dollars. It talking pennies in the overall picture. Four years from now 40 50 million will be the highest paid quarterback. And you’ll be *****ing then to

 

[CATCH17]

Yes, but if anybody does say that he needs a great defense, it's considered a criticism, meaning he's not good enough to win a SB for the Dallas Cowboys unless he has that, whereas if the Cowboys had another quarterback, e.g. Dalton taking over, it would happen.

Russell Wilson is widely considered one of, and by many, the best NFL quarterbacks. An "elite" quarterback, one who can "carry the team on his back" and "make everyone around him better".

Yet the two years he "led" his team to the Super Bowl, Seattle had the number one overall defense. Without that, he's not been back to the Super Bowl.

So to pose a question, does the "elite" quarterback, one that can win SBs without a great defense, really exist? The last SB P. Manning won, he had an poor, comparatively speaking, regular and playoff season. But he still "won" the SB. How, if he wasn't a "great" quarterback at the time.

The number one, and by definition therefore, great defense was undoubtedly a massive part of that season.

Of course it's not that simple, the Saints deserved to be in the SB a couple more times, based on their regular season, but one poor defensive play and one poor officiating call ruined those seasons' opportunity. Having the great offense/defense was negated by those two plays, both were very late game plays, normally one play doesn't define a game, but if the plays are the last one of the game, or close enough to it, they do. Patriots were extremely lucky to win their last SB, again a very late game play, the absolutely imbecilic play call probably (but you never know, maybe Beast mode would have fumbled, etc.) cost them a second SB win. Aaron Rodgers is "elite", by nearly all accounts, but he's only been to one SB.

Just saying that to concentrate on having the great defense or offense, and achieving that, doesn't guarantee championships. Can't place the blame on Dak, or the defense, or the coaching entirely, but they all play a part in winning or losing.

Russell won the Super Bowl on his rookie deal.

Seattle has been ok since then while he has been playing at a high level.

Even high level QB play doesn’t overcome expensive QB contracts and you can make the case that he is at least worth his contract where as Dak has no business getting that kind of money.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Yes, but if anybody does say that he needs a great defense, it's considered a criticism, meaning he's not good enough to win a SB for the Dallas Cowboys unless he has that, whereas if the Cowboys had another quarterback, e.g. Dalton taking over, it would happen.

Russell Wilson is widely considered one of, and by many, the best NFL quarterbacks. An "elite" quarterback, one who can "carry the team on his back" and "make everyone around him better".

Yet the two years he "led" his team to the Super Bowl, Seattle had the number one overall defense. Without that, he's not been back to the Super Bowl.

So to pose a question, does the "elite" quarterback, one that can win SBs without a great defense, really exist? The last SB P. Manning won, he had an poor, comparatively speaking, regular and playoff season. But he still "won" the SB. How, if he wasn't a "great" quarterback at the time.

The number one, and by definition therefore, great defense was undoubtedly a massive part of that season.

Of course it's not that simple, the Saints deserved to be in the SB a couple more times, based on their regular season, but one poor defensive play and one poor officiating call ruined those seasons' opportunity. Having the great offense/defense was negated by those two plays, both were very late game plays, normally one play doesn't define a game, but if the plays are the last one of the game, or close enough to it, they do. Patriots were extremely lucky to win their last SB, again a very late game play, the absolutely imbecilic play call probably (but you never know, maybe Beast mode would have fumbled, etc.) cost them a second SB win. Aaron Rodgers is "elite", by nearly all accounts, but he's only been to one SB.

Just saying that to concentrate on having the great defense or offense, and achieving that, doesn't guarantee championships. Can't place the blame on Dak, or the defense, or the coaching entirely, but they all play a part in winning or losing.

Very good point. I agree.

 

[Whirlwin]

You’re right.

I do know he will get paid.

I also know that we will not be closer to getting to a Superbowl for it.

So you know it’s not about money. It’s just about your perspective on our quarterback. Well I disagree with you my cowboy brother. I think the kid is a leader and he will get a ring. Everything will fall in place

 

[CATCH17]

Lmao. How many times have I heard this . The salary cap has never been an issue for the Cowboys and it never will be. We always find a way. From restructuring all the way up to inflated dollars. It talking pennies in the overall picture. Four years from now 40 50 million will be the highest paid quarterback. And you’ll be *****ing then to

Paying a QB more than 13% of the cap and winning a Super Bowl has been an issue for all 32 teams.


Nobody said that we couldn’t pay Dak and still get our standard ho hum results.

 

[Whirlwin]

Paying a QB more than 13% of the cap and winning a Super Bowl has been an issue for all 32 teams.


Nobody said that we couldn’t pay Dak and still get our standard ho hum results.

Then why bring it up with your argument. The bottom line is you don’t like him I’d have more respect if you just come out and say it .