Twitter: Dak against playoff teams

[plymkr]

Oh you're seeing qualitative analysis and even some quantitative analysis of Dak - it's just based on insufficient, biased, poorly sourced "data". I mean QBR itself is biased.

I'm a pattern-seeking mammal. I predicted Dak would choke in the GB game and he went full on deer-in-headlights. As I said...a lowly mammal like me was able to predict the future. How?

Predictive analysis based on my eye test lol.

Yeah the deer in the headlights is qualitative and the stats posted in the OP is quantitative.

This is the reason why the “Dak debate” will never be concluded. The two research data techniques don’t come to the same conclusion. The quantitative data doesn’t produce the qualitative results and vice verse. So whatever data a person wants to use the counter argument can be made and it goes in circles.

It’s the Barry vs Emmitt argument. A Barry fan says the stats and an Emmitt fan says the experience. It will go around in circles for years and never be resolved. When qualitative and quantitative studies are not congruent there will always be an impasse with opposing sides based on what opinions they have and research they’re using.

The Dak debate will be a never ending paradox due to this concept IMO.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Yeah the deer in the headlights is qualitative and the stats posted in the OP is quantitative.

This is the reason why the “Dak debate” will never be concluded. The two research data techniques don’t come to the same conclusion. The quantitative data doesn’t produce the qualitative results and vice verse. So whatever data a person wants to use the counter argument can be made and it goes in circles.

It’s the Barry vs Emmitt argument. A Barry fan says the stats and an Emmitt fan says the experience. It will go around in circles for years and never be resolved. When qualitative and quantitative studies are not congruent there will always be an impasse with opposing sides based on what opinions they have and research they’re using.

The Dak debate will be a never ending paradox due to this concept IMO.

As you have rightly stated, generally a player has to pass both tests in order to be considered good/great. If someone is racking up stats - but not in meaningful games or against inferior opponents - it alters the analysis in a qualitative sense.

The really good QBs just get their teams to the playoffs - barring injury. Sometimes they do it with a bad defense. Sometimes it's with a dominant offense. Sometimes with an average offense and a great D. The point is that predictability of results makes looking at the numbers post-mortem analysis of what our eyes see but data doesn't always explain.

 

[TheSport78]

Hey Sporty, Eagles love your green dissonance of pumping hope.

Yes, my criticism of the Cowboys automatically doesn't make me a fan anymore. I simply don't choose to be a sheep.

 

[TheSport78]

What’s up with these fans who root for the Cowboys and pretend that Jerry loves everyone but them lol. Jerry loves you too lol.

Jerry's a narcissist. He has love for any fan that keeps him and the Cowboys relevant, so I guess I agree with you lol

 

[Rockport]

Oh you're seeing qualitative analysis and even some quantitative analysis of Dak - it's just based on insufficient, biased, poorly sourced "data". I mean QBR itself is biased.

I'm a pattern-seeking mammal. I predicted Dak would choke in the GB game and he went full on deer-in-headlights. As I said...a lowly mammal like me was able to predict the future. How?

Predictive analysis based on my eye test lol.

 

[Rockport]

Yes, my criticism of the Cowboys automatically doesn't make me a fan anymore. I simply don't choose to be a sheep.

Roids cause anger issues.

 

[Relayer]

Notice how the haters don't have anything to say.

I thought we were going to see wind/losses.

 

[Relayer]

So Marino isn’t ever allowed to brag that he was a good QB?

You think Dak is like Marino?

 

[Relayer]

Dak, Dak, Dak. So only Dak has poor starts to playoff games. It’s all Dak’s fault. Jeez, you people need to go to church or something.

There's church and there's the Dak cult. Not the same thing.

 

[Relayer]

Mahomes that low is shocking.

It just shows how a single stat isn't that meaningful.

 

[Praxit]

Oh is he another Eagle fan?

..has to be, by now ..lol ..

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

It just shows how a single stat isn't that meaningful.

Or hasn’t been playing that well?

 

[zekecowboy]

Notice how the haters don't have anything to say.

Dak Prescott has a career passer rating of 91.8 in the 7 playoff games he has started. 2 wins, 5 losses.

However, if looking strictly at his regular-season matchups against teams that made the playoffs in those same seasons, his career passer rating is around 99.0

 

[Sobe]

I posted this before, but I'll post it again:

Is this playing catch up, when the team is behind by 2-3 TDs?

 

[DogFace]

Marino himself will tell you that his biggest regret is not winning the SB, and that he would gladly trade all of his stats for one ring.

Tell me how that’s related to my question

 

[DogFace]

Remind all of us who played in super bowl 19, and while you're at it remind us who made it to 3 AFCCG's

You or someone said “holding the Lombardi”

Did he get to hold it for Montana as a gesture of goodwill?

 

[DogFace]

You think Dak is like Marino?

I’m not saying Dak is Dan Marino. I’m saying if your only standard for success is winning a Super Bowl, and that what was presented, then that same standard says Dan Marino wasn’t successful either. If that conclusion sounds wrong, then the standard is incomplete.

I’m comparing logic. Not necessary the QB’s.

Make sense?

 

[Whyjerry]

What's your point?
Romo was 35 with "2 playoff wins"

Dak will be 33 on July 29.........

Meaning he has been around a long time with little success. That's all.

 

[ratkinson]

How dare you say something about Dak! Now, go to church. lmao

And pray for forgiveness.

 

[Jarntt]

Yay a Dak thread